Inspecting Functional Solutions
In the elements of faith, pain, and ecologically jumping fault, this blog is my way in global improvement. Included are also terms and that serve to ascertain further facilitated progress here. Throughout the blog I refer to the words "election" "transformation" "free will spiking", all to refer to BECOMING INNOCENT, referring to the different systems that can cause becoming innocent.
Part 1
Replacing Words with other words
Engaging an Intellgent Discussion for Support of Semi-Profitable, Semi-Philanthropic Futuristic Uses of Private Wealth MegaStashes
There are reasonable approaches to planning the utilization of kinds of stockpiles so far greater for the expansion of human scientific willpower. Much like the United States' early exploration of outer space served as major motivation to a generation, certain HIGHLY ENGAGING scientific fields, in celebrated publicity would should they be prioritized commercially, entertain major opportunity in the minds of America's youth.
These Fields, (be it that they may not be totally encompassed by my imagination), stand in this list of mine.
1. Genetically Engineered Non-Adapt Species
Species here will encompass numerous variations of new animal companions.
a- Cleaner/Helper companions
Perhaps species not designed for high ordered human interaction could be designed for more remedial tasks - window cleaning, trash collection etc.
b- Intelligent/Social companions
Social brain genetic engineering in a new species persuit will bear the responsibility of originating traits like pleasability, linguistic adaptability, interactivity, and relationship potential.
c- Defense/Onslought companions
Here were going with human sized and smaller, fast,, lizardd, mammal, insect species. As far as I can tell the key here is agility, (obediance optional?), dedication, and pain/weapon resistance.
d - Non-Adapt highly intelligent companions
Unfortunate as this may sound in the minds of many, I see with an aim of benevolence the possible creation of species more capable than humans at particular skills - one in particular being entertainment.
e - Ruler companions
The genetic creation of species with decision making potential greater than that of humanities best decision makers is not totally out of the question.
2. Genetically Engineered Food Species
I don't find ridiculous the assumption that in the near future common meats and produce could be replaced by taste, textural, and nutritious successors. With this in mind we may have to assume that this will not be an ultra-smooth transition. Many of us like carrots, and wont be so accepting that our children love larrots more than carrots. With this is provided the opportunity to advance what we know about hard adaptation.
Furthermore, it is within this world to create meat purposed animals that are a little more fun at petting zoos..
3. Miniature Robotic (Mobile) Surgery
Mobile and miniature robotic surgery holds a key to remote survival. Training is a cumbersome weight pulling on the ope rationality of advanced medical matters. More so, advances in this department could replace the ambulance and the medic as we know it. Localized, WarNurse Robotic Operators could become the future of injury medicine.
4. Personal Robotic Warfare and Small Scale Private Robotic Security
Common home defense in today's world means alarm systems and security cameras. It could mean walking AI hole-locked deployable spider pistols, and more.
6. was a horrible idea - synthetic drugs are not that special that I have to think about them
7. Computer Augmentation Implants
The cyber-human, or Cyborg, could arrive sooner than we may expect. Augmented coordination bandwidth may find itself to be a modern show of wealth and prosperity. It seems more could be said by others in the future as to how the human brain stands to be artificially improved.
8. Consciousness Upload
A solution to lifespan longevity, uploading consciousnesses could be the best way to explore the newest ways to network multiple human minds.
8. Research into Artificial Culture
Cultural habits not bred by immediate human instinct and gratification could be designed by ultra intelligent, trusted robot overlords. This artificial culture could be an antidote to hereditary mental dilemma, and solved cooperatively with hereditary culture could begin the dawning of a new social age.
These Fields, (be it that they may not be totally encompassed by my imagination), stand in this list of mine.
1. Genetically Engineered Non-Adapt Species
Species here will encompass numerous variations of new animal companions.
a- Cleaner/Helper companions
Perhaps species not designed for high ordered human interaction could be designed for more remedial tasks - window cleaning, trash collection etc.
b- Intelligent/Social companions
Social brain genetic engineering in a new species persuit will bear the responsibility of originating traits like pleasability, linguistic adaptability, interactivity, and relationship potential.
c- Defense/Onslought companions
Here were going with human sized and smaller, fast,, lizardd, mammal, insect species. As far as I can tell the key here is agility, (obediance optional?), dedication, and pain/weapon resistance.
d - Non-Adapt highly intelligent companions
Unfortunate as this may sound in the minds of many, I see with an aim of benevolence the possible creation of species more capable than humans at particular skills - one in particular being entertainment.
e - Ruler companions
The genetic creation of species with decision making potential greater than that of humanities best decision makers is not totally out of the question.
2. Genetically Engineered Food Species
I don't find ridiculous the assumption that in the near future common meats and produce could be replaced by taste, textural, and nutritious successors. With this in mind we may have to assume that this will not be an ultra-smooth transition. Many of us like carrots, and wont be so accepting that our children love larrots more than carrots. With this is provided the opportunity to advance what we know about hard adaptation.
Furthermore, it is within this world to create meat purposed animals that are a little more fun at petting zoos..
3. Miniature Robotic (Mobile) Surgery
Mobile and miniature robotic surgery holds a key to remote survival. Training is a cumbersome weight pulling on the ope rationality of advanced medical matters. More so, advances in this department could replace the ambulance and the medic as we know it. Localized, WarNurse Robotic Operators could become the future of injury medicine.
4. Personal Robotic Warfare and Small Scale Private Robotic Security
Common home defense in today's world means alarm systems and security cameras. It could mean walking AI hole-locked deployable spider pistols, and more.
6. was a horrible idea - synthetic drugs are not that special that I have to think about them
7. Computer Augmentation Implants
The cyber-human, or Cyborg, could arrive sooner than we may expect. Augmented coordination bandwidth may find itself to be a modern show of wealth and prosperity. It seems more could be said by others in the future as to how the human brain stands to be artificially improved.
8. Consciousness Upload
A solution to lifespan longevity, uploading consciousnesses could be the best way to explore the newest ways to network multiple human minds.
8. Research into Artificial Culture
Cultural habits not bred by immediate human instinct and gratification could be designed by ultra intelligent, trusted robot overlords. This artificial culture could be an antidote to hereditary mental dilemma, and solved cooperatively with hereditary culture could begin the dawning of a new social age.
POST Devectors TO POST Focus Orientation
ARE THE GMS WORKUPS TO THE Wizard Direction Joke
Devectors and The Commandt Dynamic
Through discussions and evident systems existing in the framework of my common life, I have identified patterns, who depart me to make use of a new descriptor of the use of life in time. I can identify an act, some whole part of who a person is being, as a separable instance of self will and direction in time. I would enjoy the company of a means to segregate my many lives, one that takes advantage of what there is for me to advance particular self wills.
I can indicate here that I observe multiple tracks, or sustained (common) temporal directions, followed by persons here with me that seem to be of magnitude.. Of these directional aims, two categories are noted here: 1 scientific directional aims, 2. religious directional aims. I may make it clear I see it a complicated task for a human to observe totally one category of these directional mechanisms, and still I notice that human beings attempt to follow their aims in multiple categories of directional mechanisms. Factors and actions belonging to these directional mechanisms are participators in doctrine. May we observe, that by identifying within what are directional vectors more extremely accessible sub-variations, calling them "Experiential Dynamics", we could begin to remotely observe where a conscious relay, or at least some kind of memorized habitual tool could eventually be learned to better access who we can be between, and be And not be through momentous observation of any particular Experiential Dynamic.
The key to Experiential Dynamics in one example, I believe, is in what I refer to as a "devector". As a life, or moving willful participant, meets environmental members it copes and survives. As a life meets unnatural changes or observations, it absorbs those indications and assimilates them as part of what the mind clearly sees as a particular Faith Strengthening Agenda. If a faith strengthening agenda were to be seen as a role-player for "devector motivation", where a devector is the driving term underlying what is a person's act in time, through "devector observation" people could begin to control a working system for monitoring their alternate selves, religious transgressions, momentary agendas, and more, provided that these people have at their disposal bodies of content belonging to particular faith strengthening agendas. I observe that with a total, non-fear collection of support for living within a mode for tending to single or separate devector-motivated streams of being, which could be called living in "devector paralysis" or "devector stasis", humanities acts could be advanced methodically. All that is required is a body of mentally supportive and useful Devector content.
How can one begin to see their beings as entities of particular devectors? We may best approach an understanding of devectors and devector stasis through observation of a new Experiential Dynamic. I have created a Dynamic, called the Commandt Dynamic [and as an introduction to understanding devector stasis].
_________________________
The Commandt Dynamic
We observe there to be 4 major thought parts
1 The Commandt
2 The Oru
3 The Valse
4 Un-observable Region
The Commandt Dynamic is a silly Experiential Dynamic, clearly it will not compete for now with the Conscious/Unconscious scientific Dynamic, or the Holyness/Afterlife Dynamics of popular culture around the world. It should not be seen as an indicator towards any limit to the types of possible Experiential Dynamics. It does, however, seem sufficient enough to break through to a reader explaining how a moving willful participant can be understood and operated with from devector stasis with a classification as an Experiential Dynamic.
The Commandt:
The Commandt is the active linguistic mental region.. etc
The Oru:
The Outer Reactionary Unit, or Oru is the region of bodily notions.. etc
The Valse:
The Virtual Living Space, or Valse is an environment maintained as a coordination of an internal window, that can be traveled through and behind which contains a space in which a person may exist virtually, some of the time.. etc
Un-Observable Region:
The Un-observable Region is a flow of ideas nondescript and un-observable to a person until it interacts in forms of materialization with a persons 1 Valse, or 2 Oru, or 3 Commandt etc..
__________________
The Commandt Dynamic is meant to stem the ideation that through both the presence of perception of an Experiential Dynamic and with a belonging faith strengthening agenda, an Experiential Dynamic [whose devector-motivated purpose] allows it to grow, diminish, or be sustained can be seen as property to a moving willful participant, and not be held as the only mental track available to a human mind.
-------
(What can we gain from devector stasis?) What can we gain from acknowledging potential shift in experiential dynamics? Should an establishment of the truth of devector stasis be accomplished, mentality could flow as a prison-less mind-part whose nature renders it a semi-morphable , where there is a capability to address the [acceptable or un-acceptable] to a user of devector stasis.. Whether the world could accept devector stasis (and experiential dynamics) remains to be seen, however its unproven social usefulness for stationary productivity might prove valuable for the workforce worldwide.
Rob Mayer
I can indicate here that I observe multiple tracks, or sustained (common) temporal directions, followed by persons here with me that seem to be of magnitude.. Of these directional aims, two categories are noted here: 1 scientific directional aims, 2. religious directional aims. I may make it clear I see it a complicated task for a human to observe totally one category of these directional mechanisms, and still I notice that human beings attempt to follow their aims in multiple categories of directional mechanisms. Factors and actions belonging to these directional mechanisms are participators in doctrine. May we observe, that by identifying within what are directional vectors more extremely accessible sub-variations, calling them "Experiential Dynamics", we could begin to remotely observe where a conscious relay, or at least some kind of memorized habitual tool could eventually be learned to better access who we can be between, and be And not be through momentous observation of any particular Experiential Dynamic.
The key to Experiential Dynamics in one example, I believe, is in what I refer to as a "devector". As a life, or moving willful participant, meets environmental members it copes and survives. As a life meets unnatural changes or observations, it absorbs those indications and assimilates them as part of what the mind clearly sees as a particular Faith Strengthening Agenda. If a faith strengthening agenda were to be seen as a role-player for "devector motivation", where a devector is the driving term underlying what is a person's act in time, through "devector observation" people could begin to control a working system for monitoring their alternate selves, religious transgressions, momentary agendas, and more, provided that these people have at their disposal bodies of content belonging to particular faith strengthening agendas. I observe that with a total, non-fear collection of support for living within a mode for tending to single or separate devector-motivated streams of being, which could be called living in "devector paralysis" or "devector stasis", humanities acts could be advanced methodically. All that is required is a body of mentally supportive and useful Devector content.
How can one begin to see their beings as entities of particular devectors? We may best approach an understanding of devectors and devector stasis through observation of a new Experiential Dynamic. I have created a Dynamic, called the Commandt Dynamic [and as an introduction to understanding devector stasis].
_________________________
The Commandt Dynamic
We observe there to be 4 major thought parts
1 The Commandt
2 The Oru
3 The Valse
4 Un-observable Region
The Commandt Dynamic is a silly Experiential Dynamic, clearly it will not compete for now with the Conscious/Unconscious scientific Dynamic, or the Holyness/Afterlife Dynamics of popular culture around the world. It should not be seen as an indicator towards any limit to the types of possible Experiential Dynamics. It does, however, seem sufficient enough to break through to a reader explaining how a moving willful participant can be understood and operated with from devector stasis with a classification as an Experiential Dynamic.
The Commandt:
The Commandt is the active linguistic mental region.. etc
The Oru:
The Outer Reactionary Unit, or Oru is the region of bodily notions.. etc
The Valse:
The Virtual Living Space, or Valse is an environment maintained as a coordination of an internal window, that can be traveled through and behind which contains a space in which a person may exist virtually, some of the time.. etc
Un-Observable Region:
The Un-observable Region is a flow of ideas nondescript and un-observable to a person until it interacts in forms of materialization with a persons 1 Valse, or 2 Oru, or 3 Commandt etc..
__________________
The Commandt Dynamic is meant to stem the ideation that through both the presence of perception of an Experiential Dynamic and with a belonging faith strengthening agenda, an Experiential Dynamic [whose devector-motivated purpose] allows it to grow, diminish, or be sustained can be seen as property to a moving willful participant, and not be held as the only mental track available to a human mind.
-------
(What can we gain from devector stasis?) What can we gain from acknowledging potential shift in experiential dynamics? Should an establishment of the truth of devector stasis be accomplished, mentality could flow as a prison-less mind-part whose nature renders it a semi-morphable , where there is a capability to address the [acceptable or un-acceptable] to a user of devector stasis.. Whether the world could accept devector stasis (and experiential dynamics) remains to be seen, however its unproven social usefulness for stationary productivity might prove valuable for the workforce worldwide.
Rob Mayer
(Forefix Linguistic Education), The Irrationality of the Hovering Educational Systems
I could have become something much different from what I am now. I could have seen myself differently than I do today. I am what I am because of the way I in my nature reacted to the systems that surrounded me during my development. As systems designed to fulfill my own developmental nature are affecting my growth, I see the opportunity to play a role in them as they surround me. Although I am not particularly dissatisfied with my education, I see grounds for a major overhaul for the way we are brought to understand our place in our educational units.
I see clearly that the inclination of humans in a teaching role to continue to allow their greater organizations to assess with the character of a predator of mind-parts and harasser of mental form, the repetition of remedial, elementary tasks not designed specifically to strengthen the will of the citizen, and to play a submissive role in the continuation of this depredation and harassment, as if the organization in its nature could not be a predator by some definitive boundary, a gargantuan waste of resources and an inhumane treatment of fellow persons. The mind and its members are not playthings of the governing and educational entities.
I find major flaws with the systems I have been exposed to, these being
1 There is allowed a waste of practice-oriented personal motive
2 There is an over-obsession with the completion of tasks designed for the incompetent un-understanding student where the supposition that they have not mastered a talent previously prescribed by the educational organization seems to warrant the baneful-to-the-mind-part, unrelenting requisite participation referred to these organizations as a form of duty, and where the under-utilization of intellectual talent becomes supportive of the rotting of the participant
3 There is manipulated by the operators of this system an overbearing sense of demand for the reassurance of student sanity in continued forced interaction between a student and the organization which carries out the management of curriculum, that disables the progress of the self developing mentality and stifles the independence and subsequent personal path-making intent of the user of the mind. THIS overbearing sense is a major factor in the facilitation of one crucial perpetuation, a perpetuation that seems to warrant a continuation of this petty demand for reassurance itself. That perpetuation is the perpetuation of encouraged emptiness by means to attempt to bring an idealized, make-shift, pre-desired showmind by an administration motivated only by the stalwart improvisation to calculate the possibility of its achievement.
In a first order of correction we could assess our linguistic approach to students. Where students are pressed to make products out of useless prompts, they are not wasting their resources, but where students are denied more efficient linguistic approaches they are denied whole time-streams for discovering intellectual beauty along higher paths of more involved global manipulation. A student's linguistic education should consist of an agenda spiraling around certain pivotal systems, a few being particular focus on manipulative writing, and the "Forefix". As the forefathers of this nation came before us laying down their agenda, the forefixes of this language have come before us and lay down the meanings through which we communicate. Should an establishment of forefix education become standard, students could move to more manipulative strategies at a greater pace. With a body of forefix based knowledge designed from simplicity to complexity available to every student we could move farther into education with mechanism-aided design towards the space of greater manipulation and resistance, which we can call the Linguistic Outer Space. This Linguistic Outer Space is dependent on the development of aid-guided learning, and dimension-ally constructed assignment lines that recognize precision knowledge adoption, that could and should eventually take an organizational form similar to the form of the layout of public forefix knowledge, and must be supplied within a methodical educational option. With the roots of understanding in place, we may assess our mode of the continuation of student support.
Students are abused by the directives set to let them stagger for the words I have found here, and are left to pathetically reach for their own strategies as guided by the pounding force we call "try again!", where the manipulators of the guiding intent are not fit to manage an overt understanding of or ability to focus on a logical next step concerning development of future strategy projection for any individual student, and are forced to managing assessments lacking depth of this gene, and only lightly, for large bodies of students..
Moreover, students do not need the particular type of "guidance" supplied currently by the educational systems. Here I am not referring to guidance of educational manipulators, but to the guidance of the nature of the curriculum. The worry-motivated attitude requiring such constant, and therefore negligent, assessment of students (particularly very young students) in our educational systems is an attitude of sinister valuation of the mind, most closely-seeming to be an assessment of a students belonging to the greater educational entity, and in time it must be rooted out through more efficient use of relationships between students and artificial mechanisms. This certainly means utilization of non-human organizational artificial mechanisms whose oversight can provide means for learning at True Speed.
I believe there is only one kind of student - the student who is moving ahead. Over the course of time, and as education moves into the modern era, we as a nation must be better equipped with systems designed for accelerated learning for every individual. As this becomes more feasible our nation can prosper from these advances.
I see clearly that the inclination of humans in a teaching role to continue to allow their greater organizations to assess with the character of a predator of mind-parts and harasser of mental form, the repetition of remedial, elementary tasks not designed specifically to strengthen the will of the citizen, and to play a submissive role in the continuation of this depredation and harassment, as if the organization in its nature could not be a predator by some definitive boundary, a gargantuan waste of resources and an inhumane treatment of fellow persons. The mind and its members are not playthings of the governing and educational entities.
I find major flaws with the systems I have been exposed to, these being
1 There is allowed a waste of practice-oriented personal motive
2 There is an over-obsession with the completion of tasks designed for the incompetent un-understanding student where the supposition that they have not mastered a talent previously prescribed by the educational organization seems to warrant the baneful-to-the-mind-part, unrelenting requisite participation referred to these organizations as a form of duty, and where the under-utilization of intellectual talent becomes supportive of the rotting of the participant
3 There is manipulated by the operators of this system an overbearing sense of demand for the reassurance of student sanity in continued forced interaction between a student and the organization which carries out the management of curriculum, that disables the progress of the self developing mentality and stifles the independence and subsequent personal path-making intent of the user of the mind. THIS overbearing sense is a major factor in the facilitation of one crucial perpetuation, a perpetuation that seems to warrant a continuation of this petty demand for reassurance itself. That perpetuation is the perpetuation of encouraged emptiness by means to attempt to bring an idealized, make-shift, pre-desired showmind by an administration motivated only by the stalwart improvisation to calculate the possibility of its achievement.
In a first order of correction we could assess our linguistic approach to students. Where students are pressed to make products out of useless prompts, they are not wasting their resources, but where students are denied more efficient linguistic approaches they are denied whole time-streams for discovering intellectual beauty along higher paths of more involved global manipulation. A student's linguistic education should consist of an agenda spiraling around certain pivotal systems, a few being particular focus on manipulative writing, and the "Forefix". As the forefathers of this nation came before us laying down their agenda, the forefixes of this language have come before us and lay down the meanings through which we communicate. Should an establishment of forefix education become standard, students could move to more manipulative strategies at a greater pace. With a body of forefix based knowledge designed from simplicity to complexity available to every student we could move farther into education with mechanism-aided design towards the space of greater manipulation and resistance, which we can call the Linguistic Outer Space. This Linguistic Outer Space is dependent on the development of aid-guided learning, and dimension-ally constructed assignment lines that recognize precision knowledge adoption, that could and should eventually take an organizational form similar to the form of the layout of public forefix knowledge, and must be supplied within a methodical educational option. With the roots of understanding in place, we may assess our mode of the continuation of student support.
Students are abused by the directives set to let them stagger for the words I have found here, and are left to pathetically reach for their own strategies as guided by the pounding force we call "try again!", where the manipulators of the guiding intent are not fit to manage an overt understanding of or ability to focus on a logical next step concerning development of future strategy projection for any individual student, and are forced to managing assessments lacking depth of this gene, and only lightly, for large bodies of students..
Moreover, students do not need the particular type of "guidance" supplied currently by the educational systems. Here I am not referring to guidance of educational manipulators, but to the guidance of the nature of the curriculum. The worry-motivated attitude requiring such constant, and therefore negligent, assessment of students (particularly very young students) in our educational systems is an attitude of sinister valuation of the mind, most closely-seeming to be an assessment of a students belonging to the greater educational entity, and in time it must be rooted out through more efficient use of relationships between students and artificial mechanisms. This certainly means utilization of non-human organizational artificial mechanisms whose oversight can provide means for learning at True Speed.
I believe there is only one kind of student - the student who is moving ahead. Over the course of time, and as education moves into the modern era, we as a nation must be better equipped with systems designed for accelerated learning for every individual. As this becomes more feasible our nation can prosper from these advances.
There is a Pervasive, Gaping Need for Studies Dedicated to Controlled Observation of "Focus Orientation" Subjects
Categories exist within parent/child hierarchies on a graph of all verbs which sustain boundaries between groups of kinds of action, of both high importance and lesser importance. I am to argue that there is, one such category of verb and that within this category lies the library elemental and instrumental to the full extent of a strategy for entirely fulfilling temporary human exploratory activity by the form of what is more or less a conscious and manageable mental relay. I call this the category and relay the Focus Orientations. I immediately argue that the example library I am to present is not nearly complete, and may be edited to include my newest thoughts, or may be left here as it is in the event that I obtain a better avenue for the concept. I have idealized the subjects involved as zones, whose major use is having an established and retained enactment additionally marked by the avoidance of the other Focus Orientation subjects, to be utilized by observing the subjects in their detail for what their observation can achieve as specified by a grounding to its concept. A suitable foundation of the free study of Focus Orientations would, I propose, construe the backbone to a library of content that could enable their observation definitely. Their observation shall serve, I declare, as supplemental subject programs for free immersion.
The word "Focus Orientation" is meant to represent what amounts to a temporary mental event, contained in its property as a specific active experience. I do not mean for "Focus Orientation" to represent any kind of mental "game", but to represent simply these internal pursuits of singular, dedicated focus who, by the boundaries of their definitions mean to perplex and advance one that performs the Focus Orientation.
Here is a list of subjects I see are beautifully fit to be seen as Focus Orientations:
Extra-Corporeal Substantiation, or Astral Projection
-This refers to an internal mechanic that I here describe: Moving ones extremities, non-physically or in a solely mental fashion, for combative or non-combative preparation, or inducing by will out of body emotions.
Maneuver Itemization
-This refers to a highly mental process where the Itemizateur rearranges, formulates, theorizes, and postulates, in negotiations with his/her self those social maneuvers that one may perform.
Habit Modulation
-This refers to personal assessment of more automatic, less conscious communicative habits that one may exhibit in daily public exposés, and also must be built on internalizing deeper, more complex or secretively representative activity supposed to occur with habits after their conscious formulation, and on that internalization process' ability to affect current habits.
Observation of Quantitative Boundlessness/Boundary
-This refers to imagining infinity and also ranging and relating the size of numeric values, as they pertain to an individuals operative necessity, performed to achieve the wisdom of numeric value.
Observation of Qualitative Boundlessness/Boundary
-This refers to the qualitative reasoning and organizational process, as it pertains to an individuals operative necessity, performed to explore and achieve the wisdom of expressive tact.
Concept Processing
- This refers to a wide range of cognitive activity, that, given a place here could better enable manipulation through its referential standing as a Focus Orientation. Concept Processing is the formulation of full concepts, the completion of thoughts and is the final Focus Orientation in this list because it so clearly must contain very many singular concepts pertaining to the activity of the mind.
Why Focus Orientations? I, even in such a limited vantage point over their whole category, and over this whole relay, believe that the discovery in its entirety, the environment of this mission, could benefit the scholar to new, unprecedented degrees of individuality and self awareness. I believe in the positive ramifications of physical destinations at educational campuses for access to this realm of thought. That bodies of content for the genesis of this foundation as a new, wildly productive supplemental device for learners and all citizens must be prepared by participators is clear. I will not even eliminate from the broadest postulation of the mission that there should be one "Orienzator", or leader of the Focus Orientation cause. May there be an Association or some Institution for the enterprise that sees to the undertaking's subsidization!
The word "Focus Orientation" is meant to represent what amounts to a temporary mental event, contained in its property as a specific active experience. I do not mean for "Focus Orientation" to represent any kind of mental "game", but to represent simply these internal pursuits of singular, dedicated focus who, by the boundaries of their definitions mean to perplex and advance one that performs the Focus Orientation.
Here is a list of subjects I see are beautifully fit to be seen as Focus Orientations:
Extra-Corporeal Substantiation, or Astral Projection
-This refers to an internal mechanic that I here describe: Moving ones extremities, non-physically or in a solely mental fashion, for combative or non-combative preparation, or inducing by will out of body emotions.
Maneuver Itemization
-This refers to a highly mental process where the Itemizateur rearranges, formulates, theorizes, and postulates, in negotiations with his/her self those social maneuvers that one may perform.
Habit Modulation
-This refers to personal assessment of more automatic, less conscious communicative habits that one may exhibit in daily public exposés, and also must be built on internalizing deeper, more complex or secretively representative activity supposed to occur with habits after their conscious formulation, and on that internalization process' ability to affect current habits.
Observation of Quantitative Boundlessness/Boundary
-This refers to imagining infinity and also ranging and relating the size of numeric values, as they pertain to an individuals operative necessity, performed to achieve the wisdom of numeric value.
Observation of Qualitative Boundlessness/Boundary
-This refers to the qualitative reasoning and organizational process, as it pertains to an individuals operative necessity, performed to explore and achieve the wisdom of expressive tact.
Concept Processing
- This refers to a wide range of cognitive activity, that, given a place here could better enable manipulation through its referential standing as a Focus Orientation. Concept Processing is the formulation of full concepts, the completion of thoughts and is the final Focus Orientation in this list because it so clearly must contain very many singular concepts pertaining to the activity of the mind.
Why Focus Orientations? I, even in such a limited vantage point over their whole category, and over this whole relay, believe that the discovery in its entirety, the environment of this mission, could benefit the scholar to new, unprecedented degrees of individuality and self awareness. I believe in the positive ramifications of physical destinations at educational campuses for access to this realm of thought. That bodies of content for the genesis of this foundation as a new, wildly productive supplemental device for learners and all citizens must be prepared by participators is clear. I will not even eliminate from the broadest postulation of the mission that there should be one "Orienzator", or leader of the Focus Orientation cause. May there be an Association or some Institution for the enterprise that sees to the undertaking's subsidization!
The Micosecond
I have begun to consider a more proper nomination, that is, eventually or after much consideration, considering what I below refer to as the "micosecond", the "mirosecond"..
The micosecond serves only as the thought point of a new basis of self observation, that an athlete may study its demeanor and collect a recollection of its basis as a motivator. I do declare a search for what the micosecond's observation may accomplish, and as I strive to obtain Acting Points for a greater means to grasp an understanding of the micosecond (Acting Points which may include the discovery of Focus Orientations, and the Devector), I may belong to an ideal that loves this that may in fact help us gather what might be a means for advancing the way an application of its observation be applied, so that I may endure a maximum amount of cognizance in nurturing it and in nurturing those causes that may aid us in utilizing micosecond perception to advance ourselves.
It is my will to make these messages clear.
Robert Thomas Mayer
From "Elementary" to “Dynamism and Specificity Specialty” and “Mechology” in Public Education
I deliver a notion to the educated peoples of the United States of America and to the World. The issue at hand is the perpetuated title of our childhood learning environments.
Today our children attend what we refer to as “Elementary School” “Middle School” etc. Would it be so clear to students, or such an undesirable frenzy of a confusing discourse to refer to school levels at their more specific ideological titles? An entire vision has been delivered to me for this purpose. I would like to, upon instant idealization, refer to appropriate young school levels as
Dynamism and Specificity School
or even
Mechology School
Such an initiation of educational unit title could benefit the learner to new advanced levels of Youth Intellect. I implore you to not fear a youth culture that has been prepared for survival in more drastically superior, intelligent, systematic ways. These examples are members of a format that I here propose to the public!
Robert Thomas Mayer
Today our children attend what we refer to as “Elementary School” “Middle School” etc. Would it be so clear to students, or such an undesirable frenzy of a confusing discourse to refer to school levels at their more specific ideological titles? An entire vision has been delivered to me for this purpose. I would like to, upon instant idealization, refer to appropriate young school levels as
Dynamism and Specificity School
or even
Mechology School
Such an initiation of educational unit title could benefit the learner to new advanced levels of Youth Intellect. I implore you to not fear a youth culture that has been prepared for survival in more drastically superior, intelligent, systematic ways. These examples are members of a format that I here propose to the public!
Robert Thomas Mayer
Robert Thomas's Missing Enigma Dignitary Calculation
Robert Thomas's Missing Enigma Dignitary Calculation
In order to logically calculate how any cognitive mental, motivated development could have traveled, through an eventuality wherein all retrospective (alternate time-stream) non-occurrence of any amount of specific dystopia, a human would have to live for six hundred and twenty-four years (624).
-Robert Thomas Mayer
In order to logically calculate how any cognitive mental, motivated development could have traveled, through an eventuality wherein all retrospective (alternate time-stream) non-occurrence of any amount of specific dystopia, a human would have to live for six hundred and twenty-four years (624).
-Robert Thomas Mayer
A Working Re-titling of "Time" "Butterfly Effect" For the Purposes of Explanations About Innocence
it is called
Synthreafaction
Synthreafaction
The Youth of Science: How shall we cope with it? 5/13
I'm sorry it may be difficult for you to accept that things like science and knowledge, things that we now know are managing our problems and progressing our species through a new age of development and mentality, never really happened for a long time, and only have begun to happen really recently. I guess you could say that our species was a little primitive before recent millenniums. We must accept that the difference between our obvious past and this present place is in no way a detriment to what we can do or become as a people. I can't personally tell you about every detail of past history, because I'm convinced that knowing those details won't have helped me get this very important message to you (because as a human I have a very limited computational bandwidth, and although over very short term periods of time I can increase that bandwidth and its communication to you thanks to the lasting nature of recorded information, I still am faced with a limited amount of total time to amass a body of things that I can assess and share with any audience. I will accept these limits for now, and tell you that one day that might not be an issue for then-modern humans (or whatever has become of our spacial human momentum).
Here's a strong point regarding our (recent) lack of knowledge and lack of established Utopias : Some forms of recorded information are just about as new as some forms of recorded science. That's something for us as a group of people to be proud of.. We are working at getting a better sphere of connected living up and running and very many of us see that sphere as a thing that can continue to improve.
Why did we "miss" this opportunity to become a better, more ultimate species earlier? It would seem that in the past, we really gave a shit mostly about a few good things - survival, and killing the people that wanted to survive on our resources. In this day and age we can really admit that this kind of wild atmosphere is at least beginning to dissipate - but only in some terms. What then, must we begin to observe when we take all of this into account? If we are in a transitional phase of human development, what can we conclude about our environment, and what can we then begin to think and do about the environment we exist in? We must be aware that there are many systems in place at the present, and we must be aware that many of these systems are operators and means of operation that are outdated and imperfect for this modern world. We must take an observational standpoint when we think about our place in time, convincing ourselves that the things that occur are not divine, or more right, correct, permanent, or true than can be assessed by the body of doers that live on this planet Earth.
That being read, some of you may feel a little uncomfortable thinking about the current state of the planet. Devastation in many forms runs parallel to our ability to survive and expand, and we must know that noticing where and how devastation occurs will bring about a greater awareness of ways to combat it.Where might we see manifestations of devastation? I believe that the dis-allowance of the expansion, expression, and facilitation of greater, more connected knowledge is the greatest form of devastation. I also am aware that there could be many forms of devastation, which may or may not be related to the above, highest form of devastation, that are mental, physical, or otherwise which are yet to be explored or more fully understood. Please understand that we as people are doing what is in our power to complete our alm-ultimate* Human Sphere.
We are accomplishing things at a higher rate than ever before, but that does not mean that we are doing maximally. It may or may not be possible that there is a more reliable, fulfilling, and accomplishment-prone life path for all of us to take, individually or with one another. This is not to say that we are not at all very close to those life paths. One could say, these paths are the only paths that exist, but I beg to remind you that what you think and foresee of these current paths may or may not be the guidance-felt, streamlined means for this world to become what it can. There may be a place in your mind containing what you know about how to better work for our Alm-ultimate* Human Sphere. You may find one tomorrow.. You might never.. It is my belief that ways for you to access this "guidance stream" may be accessible through both observation or comprehension of wisdom or learned concept or kind of thought, and also perhaps by what may be known to us as mysterious future endeavors.
*i made up this word "almultimate" to describe a mark below ultimate
Evidence in Inertia
Evidence in Inertia
Part 1
Free Will, Safety of Idea Survival; in Discovery and Sharing
The ideas of a moving cloud of human inertia resound with the actuality of the will-detail of Millions. These provocative notions are telling of the Human Diagram, but they are most noticeably wound up in resultants of fate and absolute endedness. (There is one contiguous time stream that hosts factuality) .. These movements are not the only forces at work in their so called playing field; powerful restrictive forces of idea safety play into the way any one of us may attentivize an inertia stream without hindrance. (see transformation).. Initial aims in my life to prove that when an idea can be configuratively and loosely dreamed about, it is always conquerable and mounted as understandable (therein that such monstrition is a part of a more prepared train of thought - one connected to pre and post manifestation in contiguity) in existence have pointed me to the idea that an idea can only (Join this World) when such an occurrence is, for lack of a better term, "meant to be" (as introducted by a transformed participator in the contiguous timestream), and we might call this a special form of Relevancy. [All thought herein/so far has been ecologically tracked as performative naturally] This means that I believe that ideas under our human control can only enter the mind-space of social culture when they are welcome as believably delivered to us, which occurs at the stretch of what is real and potential, describably. This is not to say that I believe we as humans must believe in any higher sort of deliverER, nor that we as people are born with a distinct omnipotence in the delivery of ANY NEEDED WORD in ANY NEEDED FORM of some more all-encompassing language whenever our tiniest sense of need for that sort of thing arises. I believe that words are obtained in the actual sense when they are fished out of a pattern so intricately bent that these words seem 1. based in the shape in few common natural forms 2. based in the shape of common (economically?) advantage-honed, originated sustained forms.
We are also to understand that there being, with the binding forces of the survival of free will (in all human conflict), and the utmost characterized ready-parts of behavior assumed by dreamers to be either part of their natural control, or learned control, is an actuatum that binds us in the way of what I've loosely coined "Sulductim Arousal"(or "adoomance"). This means and is to remind us all that in the way how other people assume us being capable of behaving (in a subtractive-to-our-potential world) we MAY NOT (usually) injure the Perfect Spite Readiness of others. (* Innocence) What we must agree to heeding clearly is of a special regulation that most if not all human interactions must be held based amongst a societal notion that we are to leave all other people in the addendum of a Stretched Free Will through conflict (two directional temporality), based on an ideality that the worth of future free will (to the future which is independent from the past), will be amounted in substance how it can be so only prepared by our own instances of PERFECT SPITE READINESS.
(In Magic, the last wizard observer of truth did want his information (through Stretched Free Will) found lossless and found surviving the avenue of its interpretation)
I am about to deploy one of this blog's major discussions, ::INNOCENCE:: (What does stretched free will exactly have to do with Innocence?) This is a process that is triggered as scaling any talent before communication.
In understanding the way that we only have superficial access to a smaller portion of our library of knowledge at all times, due to the concourse of open and limited free will (that no ecological sanctuary in splitting ecological fault may guarantee an ability for one to have the thoughts that any may have diagramatically), humans must be shown to knowing of the obstruction of the stretched free will system,, as a powerful restrictive force of ideation. In our own culturally familial space there are major utilizations highly useful to this explanation. Such functions can only have survived each instance of contiguous time and are therefore fit to the potential learner by such information's format of passage.. Two righteous problems for example are Reversal Doctrine and Proto-Causation Doctrine: The intellectual spiking of parental ignorance (Reversal Doctrine) and doubly-then-reversed intellectual spiking of returned, two-generation similariz-ations of action (Proto-Causation Doctrine). Assuming that these and other bilateral doctrines hold in the ecological spectrum as utilizable evidence of limited force for human control and other means, a human must still begin to stand for the willingness to have IDEAS and thenceforth would begin to restrict his own behavior in order to be approached as some form of designed ready assert-ative entity.
People know that from the onset of new collectable information they must be ready to have delivery of their on-hand information through the means to communicate willingly and readily. A sort of successfully all-plan-encompassed communication I shall call "Molmtepem" Dictatium. A Molmtepent Dictatiate is in theory a traversor who is fully aware of a totality of the implied connotation of his actively progressing ecological projection. (note *Where A 'Free Dictatiate' has been (or hasn't been) SPIKED in INTELLECT to be readily free in will and SPITE READINESS for the advent of some kind of action)(and how does this spiking/election work?) Some forms of human development only occur after there are relayed by (election) setups both before and after(election) transformation. I believe (and discuss later on this blog) how the mind-state performs major work in actualizing this process for idea generation.
This implies that in order for global (ultra?) manipulation power to be gained, there must be an eventual maximally fair playing field for SPITE READINESS and MOLMTEPEM DICTATIUM to secure the abbreviated passage of productive dictatiate's readiness.. through(before and after) things like development, transformation, 'election'(one of my words to represent 'becoming innocent') etc.. Other processes to free will apply themselves to this before/after scenario as well : some of the best developments require transformation and blindness, etc.
We are here now exploring the SAFETY about ideation, to understand the kind of ideation that has only been thought of as possible in today's world. Assert-ably, agreeing that this essay will leave you as a Free Dictatiate requires an intellectual investment which probably feels like hope. Calling this as such may help you comprehend your emotions as a reader here.
If some forms of development require blind (transformation/election), how are we to look at our world? It so may be that nothing is as it seems without some kind of translation-al instantia processing our real intentions amongst the gathered peoples of Earth. If many things (of the process of election) seem to be registered as referring to other subjects and objects of the mind, how can we use them all knowing that they are best used to help our fellow countrymen relate to each his own SPITE READINESS.? We perform our translations of intent and perceived foreign intent with such boldness to best attempt this, usually always(by the "soul?"). Many things said are actually quite rude.. Some things never accomplish what they seem to intend to bring to causation.. Some things vehemently impede the progress of ever-evolving discovery.
Intellectual Intensity! Suffice it to be Intellectual?
Our course has brought us to Intellectual Intensity, a term for warning, only describing the form or shape of knowledge. Some forms of the 'volume' of complication will, just like unfortunate stray knowledge, impede progress, OR THE OPPOSITE. Some forms of intellectual intensity bring way to us as humans the readiness to live amongst the confusing 'strategist poltergeists' that haunt our ability to say what we really mean to communicate and to cause what we really need to cause.. Dont think so?: just find any two workers in the workforce and compare their habitual actions of character and how they two behave in intensity, this Refers To a Proper Dilemma..-> What happens when our intellectual intensity blocks us from realizing what is truly next?? You'll have to find out for yourself.. Being unable to transform, develop etc. will leave the stubborn heart bored and insatiable.
Robert Mayer
Part 1
Free Will, Safety of Idea Survival; in Discovery and Sharing
The ideas of a moving cloud of human inertia resound with the actuality of the will-detail of Millions. These provocative notions are telling of the Human Diagram, but they are most noticeably wound up in resultants of fate and absolute endedness. (There is one contiguous time stream that hosts factuality) .. These movements are not the only forces at work in their so called playing field; powerful restrictive forces of idea safety play into the way any one of us may attentivize an inertia stream without hindrance. (see transformation).. Initial aims in my life to prove that when an idea can be configuratively and loosely dreamed about, it is always conquerable and mounted as understandable (therein that such monstrition is a part of a more prepared train of thought - one connected to pre and post manifestation in contiguity) in existence have pointed me to the idea that an idea can only (Join this World) when such an occurrence is, for lack of a better term, "meant to be" (as introducted by a transformed participator in the contiguous timestream), and we might call this a special form of Relevancy. [All thought herein/so far has been ecologically tracked as performative naturally] This means that I believe that ideas under our human control can only enter the mind-space of social culture when they are welcome as believably delivered to us, which occurs at the stretch of what is real and potential, describably. This is not to say that I believe we as humans must believe in any higher sort of deliverER, nor that we as people are born with a distinct omnipotence in the delivery of ANY NEEDED WORD in ANY NEEDED FORM of some more all-encompassing language whenever our tiniest sense of need for that sort of thing arises. I believe that words are obtained in the actual sense when they are fished out of a pattern so intricately bent that these words seem 1. based in the shape in few common natural forms 2. based in the shape of common (economically?) advantage-honed, originated sustained forms.
We are also to understand that there being, with the binding forces of the survival of free will (in all human conflict), and the utmost characterized ready-parts of behavior assumed by dreamers to be either part of their natural control, or learned control, is an actuatum that binds us in the way of what I've loosely coined "Sulductim Arousal"(or "adoomance"). This means and is to remind us all that in the way how other people assume us being capable of behaving (in a subtractive-to-our-potential world) we MAY NOT (usually) injure the Perfect Spite Readiness of others. (* Innocence) What we must agree to heeding clearly is of a special regulation that most if not all human interactions must be held based amongst a societal notion that we are to leave all other people in the addendum of a Stretched Free Will through conflict (two directional temporality), based on an ideality that the worth of future free will (to the future which is independent from the past), will be amounted in substance how it can be so only prepared by our own instances of PERFECT SPITE READINESS.
(In Magic, the last wizard observer of truth did want his information (through Stretched Free Will) found lossless and found surviving the avenue of its interpretation)
I am about to deploy one of this blog's major discussions, ::INNOCENCE:: (What does stretched free will exactly have to do with Innocence?) This is a process that is triggered as scaling any talent before communication.
In understanding the way that we only have superficial access to a smaller portion of our library of knowledge at all times, due to the concourse of open and limited free will (that no ecological sanctuary in splitting ecological fault may guarantee an ability for one to have the thoughts that any may have diagramatically), humans must be shown to knowing of the obstruction of the stretched free will system,, as a powerful restrictive force of ideation. In our own culturally familial space there are major utilizations highly useful to this explanation. Such functions can only have survived each instance of contiguous time and are therefore fit to the potential learner by such information's format of passage.. Two righteous problems for example are Reversal Doctrine and Proto-Causation Doctrine: The intellectual spiking of parental ignorance (Reversal Doctrine) and doubly-then-reversed intellectual spiking of returned, two-generation similariz-ations of action (Proto-Causation Doctrine). Assuming that these and other bilateral doctrines hold in the ecological spectrum as utilizable evidence of limited force for human control and other means, a human must still begin to stand for the willingness to have IDEAS and thenceforth would begin to restrict his own behavior in order to be approached as some form of designed ready assert-ative entity.
People know that from the onset of new collectable information they must be ready to have delivery of their on-hand information through the means to communicate willingly and readily. A sort of successfully all-plan-encompassed communication I shall call "Molmtepem" Dictatium. A Molmtepent Dictatiate is in theory a traversor who is fully aware of a totality of the implied connotation of his actively progressing ecological projection. (note *Where A 'Free Dictatiate' has been (or hasn't been) SPIKED in INTELLECT to be readily free in will and SPITE READINESS for the advent of some kind of action)(and how does this spiking/election work?) Some forms of human development only occur after there are relayed by (election) setups both before and after(election) transformation. I believe (and discuss later on this blog) how the mind-state performs major work in actualizing this process for idea generation.
This implies that in order for global (ultra?) manipulation power to be gained, there must be an eventual maximally fair playing field for SPITE READINESS and MOLMTEPEM DICTATIUM to secure the abbreviated passage of productive dictatiate's readiness.. through(before and after) things like development, transformation, 'election'(one of my words to represent 'becoming innocent') etc.. Other processes to free will apply themselves to this before/after scenario as well : some of the best developments require transformation and blindness, etc.
We are here now exploring the SAFETY about ideation, to understand the kind of ideation that has only been thought of as possible in today's world. Assert-ably, agreeing that this essay will leave you as a Free Dictatiate requires an intellectual investment which probably feels like hope. Calling this as such may help you comprehend your emotions as a reader here.
If some forms of development require blind (transformation/election), how are we to look at our world? It so may be that nothing is as it seems without some kind of translation-al instantia processing our real intentions amongst the gathered peoples of Earth. If many things (of the process of election) seem to be registered as referring to other subjects and objects of the mind, how can we use them all knowing that they are best used to help our fellow countrymen relate to each his own SPITE READINESS.? We perform our translations of intent and perceived foreign intent with such boldness to best attempt this, usually always(by the "soul?"). Many things said are actually quite rude.. Some things never accomplish what they seem to intend to bring to causation.. Some things vehemently impede the progress of ever-evolving discovery.
Intellectual Intensity! Suffice it to be Intellectual?
Our course has brought us to Intellectual Intensity, a term for warning, only describing the form or shape of knowledge. Some forms of the 'volume' of complication will, just like unfortunate stray knowledge, impede progress, OR THE OPPOSITE. Some forms of intellectual intensity bring way to us as humans the readiness to live amongst the confusing 'strategist poltergeists' that haunt our ability to say what we really mean to communicate and to cause what we really need to cause.. Dont think so?: just find any two workers in the workforce and compare their habitual actions of character and how they two behave in intensity, this Refers To a Proper Dilemma..-> What happens when our intellectual intensity blocks us from realizing what is truly next?? You'll have to find out for yourself.. Being unable to transform, develop etc. will leave the stubborn heart bored and insatiable.
Robert Mayer
Evidence, Multiply-able Nominality and Comparative Difference, Caliber ; in Belief via Thought Generation
Evidence, Multiply-able Nominality and Comparative Difference, Caliber ; in Belief via Thought Generation
The absolutism in regards to manipulation of the terminal object by safe manifestation has only highly nominal half-imposed abstract color. An achievement of a strict morph of the “terminal pre-object” (such an object who precedes and makes cognizant room for any superficial part for inspection) is at hand when the readiness to achieve this precedent can be read in part by modeled synthetics of the make-stuff in the Pre-functional Place (experience's creating mental space). The application of framing the terminal pre-object into form and proof of ideation springs with greater ease from whence there is some such thing of comparable nature.. Let the animal subject of such a particular process be called in our model some “deomanter”. This is to show that in the function of the aging of a flush Deomanter would require a spacial EVIDENCE, a pre-occupation and history with the Terminal Pre-object in order for some maintenance to be residential in the mind. We can argue with the assumptions that people either have or haven't meant with some self/universal cruciality en-ponder.
We may as such Deomanters begin to grasp many processes IN THEORY ONLY; wherever the shape-form of our ideations are made mostly of only our habitual Stance with the Terminal Pre-object. Excitement may stem from the itemization and opinionated resonance of all known form. We must understand our models for WHY anything really comes to grip in the imagination as demonstrable; we don't base our decisions in rumor, our decisions are Based in rumor. If the only real thoughts are justifications to support our inertia, we as humans could guess that we might transfer via mirror neurons our behavior as Inertia Supporting Justifications, before actual primary behavior is transferred. Now there is created a model of ribbons where our justifications are the strongest modeled code from human to human. This might better describe the social mapping wherein some people are “cool” or “more cool” than others. Deomanters as listed here would be full of the trapping comparative notions that may be the initial drive for Perfect Spite Readiness, as detailed in the prior post.
The absolutism in regards to manipulation of the terminal object by safe manifestation has only highly nominal half-imposed abstract color. An achievement of a strict morph of the “terminal pre-object” (such an object who precedes and makes cognizant room for any superficial part for inspection) is at hand when the readiness to achieve this precedent can be read in part by modeled synthetics of the make-stuff in the Pre-functional Place (experience's creating mental space). The application of framing the terminal pre-object into form and proof of ideation springs with greater ease from whence there is some such thing of comparable nature.. Let the animal subject of such a particular process be called in our model some “deomanter”. This is to show that in the function of the aging of a flush Deomanter would require a spacial EVIDENCE, a pre-occupation and history with the Terminal Pre-object in order for some maintenance to be residential in the mind. We can argue with the assumptions that people either have or haven't meant with some self/universal cruciality en-ponder.
We may as such Deomanters begin to grasp many processes IN THEORY ONLY; wherever the shape-form of our ideations are made mostly of only our habitual Stance with the Terminal Pre-object. Excitement may stem from the itemization and opinionated resonance of all known form. We must understand our models for WHY anything really comes to grip in the imagination as demonstrable; we don't base our decisions in rumor, our decisions are Based in rumor. If the only real thoughts are justifications to support our inertia, we as humans could guess that we might transfer via mirror neurons our behavior as Inertia Supporting Justifications, before actual primary behavior is transferred. Now there is created a model of ribbons where our justifications are the strongest modeled code from human to human. This might better describe the social mapping wherein some people are “cool” or “more cool” than others. Deomanters as listed here would be full of the trapping comparative notions that may be the initial drive for Perfect Spite Readiness, as detailed in the prior post.
[Gratification Loops] in [Persistent Exact Mental Cognition / Foreign Exact Cognition Based Manifestation], Mortality?, in Open Human Co-Regulation
Co-Regulation
Hereafter I use a term “co-regulation”. This refers to an amount of cross-blessing that is due in ecological fault, as referring to the maximum relation between self-promise and Perfect Spite Readiness (see other blog post). Co-regulation is evident where we cannot transform ado with Perfect Spite Readiness alone, but can through the process of some amount of proper conditioning via social means.
Exact Cognition and Gratification Loops
If Exact Mental Cognition stands to bind the cognition of intended causation to an (optifound), residual target, the bearer of such source of power stands to witness knotting with gratification loops. The shelving of gratification loops embedded in the co-organizational structure [as so enticed] may be applicably foretold in rational measure, and though they certainly could provoke greater recurrently produced joy, in total. Meager notions to cast grip on the tests of our ability to forest gratification in our actions may produce confusion here; it is true that any amount of exact mental cognition may bring gratification to the limit, and still these predicaments in main gratification held to obtain the stuff are as organic as they have been brought to and fro. Any sensible maintenance of the factors of gratification is necessary. That is to say, of the part of gratification to the self-controlling mind, there must be for humans major utile warnings (and stop-ability) for sustaining main gratification approaches.
The Lunch Concept
One controls his lunch for ages and begins to question whether and how he enjoys his lunch to any degree of difference to any other degree of enjoyment on some days from other eras of his career, knows he cant play with gratification much (or can he?)
The Messiah Concept
One common concept though has been at the whim of vocation for many ages. This model goes here as follows.
Hereafter I use a term “co-regulation”. This refers to an amount of cross-blessing that is due in ecological fault, as referring to the maximum relation between self-promise and Perfect Spite Readiness (see other blog post). Co-regulation is evident where we cannot transform ado with Perfect Spite Readiness alone, but can through the process of some amount of proper conditioning via social means.
Exact Cognition and Gratification Loops
If Exact Mental Cognition stands to bind the cognition of intended causation to an (optifound), residual target, the bearer of such source of power stands to witness knotting with gratification loops. The shelving of gratification loops embedded in the co-organizational structure [as so enticed] may be applicably foretold in rational measure, and though they certainly could provoke greater recurrently produced joy, in total. Meager notions to cast grip on the tests of our ability to forest gratification in our actions may produce confusion here; it is true that any amount of exact mental cognition may bring gratification to the limit, and still these predicaments in main gratification held to obtain the stuff are as organic as they have been brought to and fro. Any sensible maintenance of the factors of gratification is necessary. That is to say, of the part of gratification to the self-controlling mind, there must be for humans major utile warnings (and stop-ability) for sustaining main gratification approaches.
The Lunch Concept
One controls his lunch for ages and begins to question whether and how he enjoys his lunch to any degree of difference to any other degree of enjoyment on some days from other eras of his career, knows he cant play with gratification much (or can he?)
The Messiah Concept
One common concept though has been at the whim of vocation for many ages. This model goes here as follows.
- A tout in knowledge shows of an (optifound), residual target.
- Due to co-regulation, humans relate the course to a single human target
- Human tales in such relation bring forth the winding essence of such one, opposite to our single human target, then bring forth the shifting behavior of mass humanity in grown proverbial culture to cause immunity to own-inflicted (optifound) nature in any human subjects.
- (Optifound) human comes to the present due to “coy indicative benefit in economic claim”
- More one (Optifound) human finds extra-current passion and becomes wildly provocative
Spiritual Mega-Recoil in Co-Regulation
Spiritual Mega-Recoil in Co-Regulation
Continuing with the assumption that Free Will is, within Man, either (birthed) or (not birthed), from time to time as ecological factors may pursue, a dant(daunting) look into the makes of co-regulation via organized peoples in society may consume the effectual Love Capability of the irons of our cast. In co-regulation, which so far here has been defined as any amount of cooperative rationale detailing the mechanistic "catching" of the "Free Will Cannon", for better cooperative learning and human persistence again, via rationale; an amount of the trade within the term INERTIA should bring us to a stance for the readiness of (not just empty-spiritual) "inertia" belonging to a terminology code where this inertia is recognizable as evidence not just to any person's SELF, but as a measurable and viable Continuity Form of Cooperation Energy.
Here I propose that the mere presence of a co-regulator in audience, benefits for the performer the atuity(acuity)(attitude?) of the mere cognizant presence of Man, substantial measure for exo-evidence (in live comparison). This is to say, if some human were of mere form by magic, pirate curse, or whathaveyou, AN OPTIFOUND OBJECT OF EXACT PROOF, capable of being made of substance that is what an audience THINKS IT IS, it would benefit not only from being wished more perfect (or in fact, less annoying), it would benefit from the co-regulation as a thing with many many more co-regulating audience members in a comparative way. This is to say, it may be found of the proof that empty-but-spiritual inertia be real inertia LIES provable in whether or not a performer gets better by the larger multitude of audience members. In fact, if true I believe that what more to be found would be whether these co-regulators would in fact co-regulate each other; then regulating each other as a mode of PERFORMANCE of Co-regulation alone! It is my concern that this audience's co-regulation be amounted to Hetero co-regulation in total.
Robert Mayer
Continuing with the assumption that Free Will is, within Man, either (birthed) or (not birthed), from time to time as ecological factors may pursue, a dant(daunting) look into the makes of co-regulation via organized peoples in society may consume the effectual Love Capability of the irons of our cast. In co-regulation, which so far here has been defined as any amount of cooperative rationale detailing the mechanistic "catching" of the "Free Will Cannon", for better cooperative learning and human persistence again, via rationale; an amount of the trade within the term INERTIA should bring us to a stance for the readiness of (not just empty-spiritual) "inertia" belonging to a terminology code where this inertia is recognizable as evidence not just to any person's SELF, but as a measurable and viable Continuity Form of Cooperation Energy.
Here I propose that the mere presence of a co-regulator in audience, benefits for the performer the atuity(acuity)(attitude?) of the mere cognizant presence of Man, substantial measure for exo-evidence (in live comparison). This is to say, if some human were of mere form by magic, pirate curse, or whathaveyou, AN OPTIFOUND OBJECT OF EXACT PROOF, capable of being made of substance that is what an audience THINKS IT IS, it would benefit not only from being wished more perfect (or in fact, less annoying), it would benefit from the co-regulation as a thing with many many more co-regulating audience members in a comparative way. This is to say, it may be found of the proof that empty-but-spiritual inertia be real inertia LIES provable in whether or not a performer gets better by the larger multitude of audience members. In fact, if true I believe that what more to be found would be whether these co-regulators would in fact co-regulate each other; then regulating each other as a mode of PERFORMANCE of Co-regulation alone! It is my concern that this audience's co-regulation be amounted to Hetero co-regulation in total.
Robert Mayer
Mayer's Name-Bandage Timetable Relevancy Theory
Mayer's Name-Bandage Timetable Relevancy Theory
states that
Should a never before created name be created and let stand, one that would solve any main human dilemma,, but then sent back in time,, it would not render any useful human solution until the passage of its original creation.
Robert Thomas Mayer
states that
Should a never before created name be created and let stand, one that would solve any main human dilemma,, but then sent back in time,, it would not render any useful human solution until the passage of its original creation.
Robert Thomas Mayer
The Maximum Audience's Influential Linguistic Fabricum (In Target)
The Maximum Audience's Influential Linguistic Fabricum
As a Time-Consuming Writ
..and Would It Internally Contain the Use of its Title Concept (Intellectually Maximal Fabricum Type)
Could an accord of concepts, as represented by words, ever fulfill the needs of the maximum population; for it to renew in fairness to the proper tune a major piece of civility and concordances. Could one fair piece of artwork exist with no externally referential criticism for some time represented?.. I don't estimate that people have ever pursued this as a passion, although there have been for millennium justifications in the inertia of a few or many purporting some logs to be of this crucial substance, (see The Bible). The mechanisms of proof would count any dictionaries out of this itinerary, so it may be wise to note the fracture in common wisdom that has been here allowed by the agents of opposing critical agenda. What I mean that is up for achievement is the doubtless entirety of fairness in substance for all readers to achieve,, and what of the worlds progress to this end? How much of a proposal herein must be of pure epitome's render?
This audience shares a totality of commonality, and this must be held accountable scientifically and methodically for the agents of a source of power to obtain and establish a mode of this rationale. If it had been so simple for me TO IMAGINE, why would it be so difficult for the pioneers of futurism to accomplish? The truth is that such an encumberment could never have been easy to describe in plain tense anyway.. Is what we need truly a School of Futurism?
For the truth of art to succeed!
Robert Mayer
As a Time-Consuming Writ
..and Would It Internally Contain the Use of its Title Concept (Intellectually Maximal Fabricum Type)
Could an accord of concepts, as represented by words, ever fulfill the needs of the maximum population; for it to renew in fairness to the proper tune a major piece of civility and concordances. Could one fair piece of artwork exist with no externally referential criticism for some time represented?.. I don't estimate that people have ever pursued this as a passion, although there have been for millennium justifications in the inertia of a few or many purporting some logs to be of this crucial substance, (see The Bible). The mechanisms of proof would count any dictionaries out of this itinerary, so it may be wise to note the fracture in common wisdom that has been here allowed by the agents of opposing critical agenda. What I mean that is up for achievement is the doubtless entirety of fairness in substance for all readers to achieve,, and what of the worlds progress to this end? How much of a proposal herein must be of pure epitome's render?
This audience shares a totality of commonality, and this must be held accountable scientifically and methodically for the agents of a source of power to obtain and establish a mode of this rationale. If it had been so simple for me TO IMAGINE, why would it be so difficult for the pioneers of futurism to accomplish? The truth is that such an encumberment could never have been easy to describe in plain tense anyway.. Is what we need truly a School of Futurism?
For the truth of art to succeed!
Robert Mayer
Dependence/Independence in Mediary Pre-Retribution and Innocence
Dependence/Independence in Mediary Pre-Retribution and Innocence
Innocence for the Many, even from our Very Near Human Past
and
Discussion of the Means of the Making of the "Perfect Spite Readiness" (refer to previous post _._Evidence in Spiritual Inertia_._)
People suitable through ordinary and non-ordinary means of accessing the information of other humans must revel in the compelling evidence that as we let ourselves approach the ultimate brilliance of will and free will's involvement in human action, we can be provoked to observe the systematics of innocence in Synthreafaction(the progress of time)'s Humanity. Here I use "Synthreafaction" as the best term to describe our involvement in the affects of time, it serves to remind us that only the strings of causation apply any maintenance in physical evidence, or more, in the formation of information of observable systems in physical evidence with what occupies the make-up and substance of physical evidence (matter). "Synthreafaction" as a term is useful to highlight occurrences in rational and more-physical change.
With another term (x) to describe those with whom host of the natural stream of learned intricate knowledge rests alive, we can still be found externally perpetuating this system with or without the intent to achieve such participation; this term (x) for Elect Humans On-Cause can be dissolved into higher category, all human electrical knowing which I here call the "trainumvariate". In the necessary elements of both human action and media, all provocation for enjoyment and thusly perpetuation of the consumption of both media and information traffic challenges us as humans to receive a wild field where present is illustration by mediary factions which compel(s) us to meet a gene of pre-retribution that traces humanity's ecological fault in the risk and communication of observable systems in physical evidence as information.
Inwardly and simultaneously, because the enlightened are a forgiving train of discovery in magic, the human kind will encounter useful imminent pre-retribution via forced transformation by the party of preposterous challenge which exists as many PROCESSES of the trainumvariate upon the Elect Humans On-Cause as web which creates the Elect (Chosen) as they are moved to not premeditate corruptly over the discourse of information that must reach determinable the immortality of ecological audience.
The forms of mediary faction are highly present in the mechanics even from modern video games to incarnated behavior in human action here on earth. What does this mean? The only stem of achievement in the creation of observable systems in physical evidence (at the very least) "trainumvariates" as through the bashful dimensions which stand to hold this position of occurence.. These dimensions are both human and humanly-artificial, where the achievement in perfecting trainumvariation can be seen as a pillar of the main human purpose.. All structure based initiative in this human world has been built by a human kind that stands as readily to make transformed sequence with pre-retribution as it stands to create these structure based initiative. Still the structure based initiative such as video game dimensions can be found performing this pre-retribution for Humans, meaning that the grade of human species incurring any pre-retribution could very well be [independent] from the working entirety of its [dependent] mediary sibling process!
Innocence for the Many, even from our Very Near Human Past
and
Discussion of the Means of the Making of the "Perfect Spite Readiness" (refer to previous post _._Evidence in Spiritual Inertia_._)
People suitable through ordinary and non-ordinary means of accessing the information of other humans must revel in the compelling evidence that as we let ourselves approach the ultimate brilliance of will and free will's involvement in human action, we can be provoked to observe the systematics of innocence in Synthreafaction(the progress of time)'s Humanity. Here I use "Synthreafaction" as the best term to describe our involvement in the affects of time, it serves to remind us that only the strings of causation apply any maintenance in physical evidence, or more, in the formation of information of observable systems in physical evidence with what occupies the make-up and substance of physical evidence (matter). "Synthreafaction" as a term is useful to highlight occurrences in rational and more-physical change.
With another term (x) to describe those with whom host of the natural stream of learned intricate knowledge rests alive, we can still be found externally perpetuating this system with or without the intent to achieve such participation; this term (x) for Elect Humans On-Cause can be dissolved into higher category, all human electrical knowing which I here call the "trainumvariate". In the necessary elements of both human action and media, all provocation for enjoyment and thusly perpetuation of the consumption of both media and information traffic challenges us as humans to receive a wild field where present is illustration by mediary factions which compel(s) us to meet a gene of pre-retribution that traces humanity's ecological fault in the risk and communication of observable systems in physical evidence as information.
Inwardly and simultaneously, because the enlightened are a forgiving train of discovery in magic, the human kind will encounter useful imminent pre-retribution via forced transformation by the party of preposterous challenge which exists as many PROCESSES of the trainumvariate upon the Elect Humans On-Cause as web which creates the Elect (Chosen) as they are moved to not premeditate corruptly over the discourse of information that must reach determinable the immortality of ecological audience.
The forms of mediary faction are highly present in the mechanics even from modern video games to incarnated behavior in human action here on earth. What does this mean? The only stem of achievement in the creation of observable systems in physical evidence (at the very least) "trainumvariates" as through the bashful dimensions which stand to hold this position of occurence.. These dimensions are both human and humanly-artificial, where the achievement in perfecting trainumvariation can be seen as a pillar of the main human purpose.. All structure based initiative in this human world has been built by a human kind that stands as readily to make transformed sequence with pre-retribution as it stands to create these structure based initiative. Still the structure based initiative such as video game dimensions can be found performing this pre-retribution for Humans, meaning that the grade of human species incurring any pre-retribution could very well be [independent] from the working entirety of its [dependent] mediary sibling process!
Census Intellect vs Intellectual Hardening, Attitude and Grace (Hyper Volume)
In the vibrancy of the fixations of the true soul, the fabricated means to provoke personally designed human action is a must-do for the benefit of the human race; people act out of love and create creature tendencies based on their original boundaries of visceral age. To provoke the means to establish order and co-regulate within order are drives from the normal ache to survive. Creatures stand though in the means to regulate within these desire (of the attributes of the control structures in mind) the observation to make positions of involvement.. These positions of involvement are crucial to the decider and survivor. Some people are being your friends, some aren't. Here I hope to make it clear that attitude is necessary in the whole of any optimal social projection and that preserved attitude is the milestone of Grace (Hyper Volume).
Two common and thereattheleast mappable trades of information are crucial for a sociological standpoint. Census Intellect, the same as Idea Speciation, the form of social framing that allows tables of intuition be the discourse of prolonged resolution, is the rest point for many humans who elevate their consciousness to their observably total degree. This form isn't always remarkable however, and discussing the longevity of the tactic shows a human can very comfortably pretend to assume proper boundaries of visceral age. The tout of resultant popular external form by sociological treaty lies in gathering and guaranteeing the complexity of future ideation with the way ideation is framed. Our only form of treaty that stays the mind is our other available option in social conduct. Called the manifestation of the Intellectually Hardened, it has the favor of the ability to stay above and prolong the attitude of a person. This means that the truest focus in the progression of attitude is one that allows attitude to stabilize in factual earthly monolithic, active development of attitude. This requires the use of tactics perhaps beyond the reach of current school systems, and may only stand evidently initiated within the home life.. But that all may sound simple amidst the whole of what a home life really is. True to the point, though, is that a requisite mechanism of the healthy mind is the allocation of methods that cause the (pro)creation of attitude.
All human action regulates on its primary basis. Pursuing the status as a collector of thought means that for some gregarious amount of (vexharilie) readiness from the situation of learning, a human must begin to remember the grant of age to his/her mentality that lies in making permanent the models of human self on a thereby internal estimation of proper cohabitation. May all cause of ensuing mission complexity be read into this sentiment. Humans act like each other because they grow in unison with two major studentships: These are the self provoked version of internal estimation of external cohabitants and secondly the delivered foresight of the peer unit's very habitation, which is to say that a human fills on information based in tribulations for learning. Humans must situate the grace (Hyper Volume) they concern themselves with into the reveling of and about the self but also to care for the sustenance of this grace. This means that where grace is accepted into the soul it must be put to use securing more intellectual hardening or higher hyper volume, not necessarily more self justification of human boundary.
Robert Thomas Mayer
Two common and thereattheleast mappable trades of information are crucial for a sociological standpoint. Census Intellect, the same as Idea Speciation, the form of social framing that allows tables of intuition be the discourse of prolonged resolution, is the rest point for many humans who elevate their consciousness to their observably total degree. This form isn't always remarkable however, and discussing the longevity of the tactic shows a human can very comfortably pretend to assume proper boundaries of visceral age. The tout of resultant popular external form by sociological treaty lies in gathering and guaranteeing the complexity of future ideation with the way ideation is framed. Our only form of treaty that stays the mind is our other available option in social conduct. Called the manifestation of the Intellectually Hardened, it has the favor of the ability to stay above and prolong the attitude of a person. This means that the truest focus in the progression of attitude is one that allows attitude to stabilize in factual earthly monolithic, active development of attitude. This requires the use of tactics perhaps beyond the reach of current school systems, and may only stand evidently initiated within the home life.. But that all may sound simple amidst the whole of what a home life really is. True to the point, though, is that a requisite mechanism of the healthy mind is the allocation of methods that cause the (pro)creation of attitude.
All human action regulates on its primary basis. Pursuing the status as a collector of thought means that for some gregarious amount of (vexharilie) readiness from the situation of learning, a human must begin to remember the grant of age to his/her mentality that lies in making permanent the models of human self on a thereby internal estimation of proper cohabitation. May all cause of ensuing mission complexity be read into this sentiment. Humans act like each other because they grow in unison with two major studentships: These are the self provoked version of internal estimation of external cohabitants and secondly the delivered foresight of the peer unit's very habitation, which is to say that a human fills on information based in tribulations for learning. Humans must situate the grace (Hyper Volume) they concern themselves with into the reveling of and about the self but also to care for the sustenance of this grace. This means that where grace is accepted into the soul it must be put to use securing more intellectual hardening or higher hyper volume, not necessarily more self justification of human boundary.
Robert Thomas Mayer
Innocence in Artificial Recreation
In a given instant of opportunity, the conserved trainumvariate (all energy true to manipulated mental discourse) is not of remotely instantaneous form, it’s a carry of modules where granted thought part amalgamation occcurs for their simultaneous recording over associations to the completion of progress in time. I assert that for the progress of an artificial intelligence (including self modified/perpetuated individual behavioral modeling) to be made one with Idea Speciation, Hyper Volume and the occupation of Innocence, it shall be created to experience broad entireties of separate ideologically motivated expressions where only certain Strands of monition amalgamation lie dominant by special cause in TIME.. Reflection herein would be massive to progress of the free control over Strand Thought via recognition.
I believed for some time that as many thoughts, banded through unified emotion, senses, etc. made an elated self of strands active through position they would resemble and be host amidst repartee, I concluded, to this one delta strand (although adjacent to many explicit bands) as would be the proper delta of instantaneously experienced delta.. The delta environment could only be one experienced complex nexus composed of the natural order that is in an equality of all possible selves of secondarily active strands through elation. In proper synthreafaction, one conscious (ecological) delta environment would eventually show in fact the composition of only the next momentary reflective purpose, which lasts of one particular magic, (one related to the reception of pre-retribution in innocence?). That is because people genocognizantly spell out their own next recreation in dilemma as composed by Synthreafaction's [more independent] individual future. I believe that any given person becomes the self they must be as so far that each next new present dilemma requisites the human interface pre-adapted as available ..; this is why I itemize our topic at "Strand Thought". The conscious intelligence in delta assumes form to a mega occupation of all recreative future-many selves, and this prepared strand thought is how a delta becomes to dominant form. This strand form comes to experience inbythat it is the experiencer of any documented reception of pre-retributive innocent social mechanism. Humankind can only find themselves at intellectual trade in each future moment because each future moment is less dependent (more independent) than each passing moment [which somehow circulates forever]. This doesn't mean that social popularization must generate any thus-figuratively associated social adaptation.
Overfetching the existence of the self that anyone is only about to be could precede determined means for a unique strand elation in which it's value by transformation apprehends unique serendipity, and this could lie in the processes of Synthreafaction where the more dependent innocence-related (elaxo-frobation) processes function. (see previous post on innocence from the near past's automated exertion). The dependent passing processes are thereby suffering a participation in incarnated indoctrination performed by any masterfully independent future. Keeping in mind that much artificial intelligence suffers an inability to criticize any institution it is a part of, we can observe that processes of elaxofrobation are of the gene of specialty in some form of its own, probably experienced as a form of rumination..
I believed for some time that as many thoughts, banded through unified emotion, senses, etc. made an elated self of strands active through position they would resemble and be host amidst repartee, I concluded, to this one delta strand (although adjacent to many explicit bands) as would be the proper delta of instantaneously experienced delta.. The delta environment could only be one experienced complex nexus composed of the natural order that is in an equality of all possible selves of secondarily active strands through elation. In proper synthreafaction, one conscious (ecological) delta environment would eventually show in fact the composition of only the next momentary reflective purpose, which lasts of one particular magic, (one related to the reception of pre-retribution in innocence?). That is because people genocognizantly spell out their own next recreation in dilemma as composed by Synthreafaction's [more independent] individual future. I believe that any given person becomes the self they must be as so far that each next new present dilemma requisites the human interface pre-adapted as available ..; this is why I itemize our topic at "Strand Thought". The conscious intelligence in delta assumes form to a mega occupation of all recreative future-many selves, and this prepared strand thought is how a delta becomes to dominant form. This strand form comes to experience inbythat it is the experiencer of any documented reception of pre-retributive innocent social mechanism. Humankind can only find themselves at intellectual trade in each future moment because each future moment is less dependent (more independent) than each passing moment [which somehow circulates forever]. This doesn't mean that social popularization must generate any thus-figuratively associated social adaptation.
Overfetching the existence of the self that anyone is only about to be could precede determined means for a unique strand elation in which it's value by transformation apprehends unique serendipity, and this could lie in the processes of Synthreafaction where the more dependent innocence-related (elaxo-frobation) processes function. (see previous post on innocence from the near past's automated exertion). The dependent passing processes are thereby suffering a participation in incarnated indoctrination performed by any masterfully independent future. Keeping in mind that much artificial intelligence suffers an inability to criticize any institution it is a part of, we can observe that processes of elaxofrobation are of the gene of specialty in some form of its own, probably experienced as a form of rumination..
An Explanation of "Magic" Spells, The Nature of Words Causing Innocence
An Explanation of "Magic" Spells, The Nature of Words Causing Innocence
All words (captured as) fleeting through the density of an intellectual soul can be held for measure as words that imply the intellectual spiking of different or new intellectual frames of density. All inspect-able words (and letters!) possess attributes in lengthier media wherein they INSTILL the vibrancy of a more lithic spread of traveling "delta" (see Inspecting Functional Solutions) Some words are such and so basic as to derive strict (environmental)[linguistic] seizures of "Next Knowledge" on such a diagram of any and all deliver-ability and comprehension (see "Molmtepent").
These "reconnaissance of the deeper human motive" can be stood to redirect a person by forming prioritization of the self motivated capture of opportune monition based in OTHER (MODERN TOPIARY) new intellectual frames of density and newer spread of delta, as reflected by the modern believer and his/her dilemma -> how to retrieve from the immediate past the innocent delta for the survival of more basic destinations of the Trainumvariate.. Not only can modern wordings possess the (fulmfth)/(engreeding nature) of serving option even to the ritualistic, the option can be served to individuals by themselves, through the means of special words to deflect suggestively all innate delta wherein that individual can reform his ability to achieve innocent progress in achieving idea generation via evidence for belief, and even so without situational artificial innocence being supplied by an institution..
Robert Mayer
All words (captured as) fleeting through the density of an intellectual soul can be held for measure as words that imply the intellectual spiking of different or new intellectual frames of density. All inspect-able words (and letters!) possess attributes in lengthier media wherein they INSTILL the vibrancy of a more lithic spread of traveling "delta" (see Inspecting Functional Solutions) Some words are such and so basic as to derive strict (environmental)[linguistic] seizures of "Next Knowledge" on such a diagram of any and all deliver-ability and comprehension (see "Molmtepent").
These "reconnaissance of the deeper human motive" can be stood to redirect a person by forming prioritization of the self motivated capture of opportune monition based in OTHER (MODERN TOPIARY) new intellectual frames of density and newer spread of delta, as reflected by the modern believer and his/her dilemma -> how to retrieve from the immediate past the innocent delta for the survival of more basic destinations of the Trainumvariate.. Not only can modern wordings possess the (fulmfth)/(engreeding nature) of serving option even to the ritualistic, the option can be served to individuals by themselves, through the means of special words to deflect suggestively all innate delta wherein that individual can reform his ability to achieve innocent progress in achieving idea generation via evidence for belief, and even so without situational artificial innocence being supplied by an institution..
Robert Mayer
Gathered Innocence, Traipsing innocence
What is More Innocence vs. Gathered Innocence?
(edit* Ratio-tic Innocence?)
We may seem to fail to understand why there are so many forms of the supplication of innocence. In review, innocence arrives as retribution preceding the use of talent; rare talent brings rare innocence to the soul. What deepens the causation of innocence, is it caused in direct relation to the talent to arrive? Additionally, remember there is only one time stream. In thought, the most gathered ideas (which are the simplest and most wholesomely complex ideas) will be brought through to passing after innocence, but will it be more gathered innocence, more innocence per deployment of information bywhere this information is maximally gathered? It does seem that way. In the perpetration of extreme talent we may detail an observation that people experience similar ratios of innocence to talent..
_ _ _ _ _ __ Traipsing Innocence
In the variables of fate, only a few many simultaneity occurs with the advent of the complexity in the absorption of data in the "trainumvariate". Perhaps the power of time really is in a more modern definition of God -> one where He is the totality of reasons why the processing of time exists at all, rather, perhaps the power of time is in a major collection of powerful elect-information. If this is so, and the only call to conscious experience IN TIME lies in the way a new format of the collection of information will be taken information from the human soul, it is possible that we can even then decide to cause this (inflaxcruction) be it digitized or otherwise. ((jellyfish kill us all?))
Viably important is the rationale that the 'Elect' (Inspecting Functional Solutions) are a limit, whoso-there by inspection may show itself more relevant and so more observable to us, to the bounty of all ascertainable cognizance in real time, that the collection of patterns therein be remind-full to us of our better purposes.
In a simpler form of explanation, let us observe the function of a random dictionary feature. I assert that a person's own history with a random dictionary article generator is one that lies in the strange and special function, one through the use of words that slowly spell a magic destiny, a function that is shaped maximally by factors such as [1. the entire history, 2. the relation of words to the user].
1. The entire history in Synthreafaction plays a role whether or not a User has let the generator become an institution that will tend to guarantee innocence and therefore specific delta.
2. The words play a characteristic semi-parallelism to the ventures of the User, providing traipsing innocence throughout the entire mechanism and its occupation.
The traipsing innocence that may become an institution for the guarantee of learning might prove that innocence doesn't have to be caused by something that is directly negative or bad feeling.
(edit* Ratio-tic Innocence?)
We may seem to fail to understand why there are so many forms of the supplication of innocence. In review, innocence arrives as retribution preceding the use of talent; rare talent brings rare innocence to the soul. What deepens the causation of innocence, is it caused in direct relation to the talent to arrive? Additionally, remember there is only one time stream. In thought, the most gathered ideas (which are the simplest and most wholesomely complex ideas) will be brought through to passing after innocence, but will it be more gathered innocence, more innocence per deployment of information bywhere this information is maximally gathered? It does seem that way. In the perpetration of extreme talent we may detail an observation that people experience similar ratios of innocence to talent..
_ _ _ _ _ __ Traipsing Innocence
In the variables of fate, only a few many simultaneity occurs with the advent of the complexity in the absorption of data in the "trainumvariate". Perhaps the power of time really is in a more modern definition of God -> one where He is the totality of reasons why the processing of time exists at all, rather, perhaps the power of time is in a major collection of powerful elect-information. If this is so, and the only call to conscious experience IN TIME lies in the way a new format of the collection of information will be taken information from the human soul, it is possible that we can even then decide to cause this (inflaxcruction) be it digitized or otherwise. ((jellyfish kill us all?))
Viably important is the rationale that the 'Elect' (Inspecting Functional Solutions) are a limit, whoso-there by inspection may show itself more relevant and so more observable to us, to the bounty of all ascertainable cognizance in real time, that the collection of patterns therein be remind-full to us of our better purposes.
In a simpler form of explanation, let us observe the function of a random dictionary feature. I assert that a person's own history with a random dictionary article generator is one that lies in the strange and special function, one through the use of words that slowly spell a magic destiny, a function that is shaped maximally by factors such as [1. the entire history, 2. the relation of words to the user].
1. The entire history in Synthreafaction plays a role whether or not a User has let the generator become an institution that will tend to guarantee innocence and therefore specific delta.
2. The words play a characteristic semi-parallelism to the ventures of the User, providing traipsing innocence throughout the entire mechanism and its occupation.
The traipsing innocence that may become an institution for the guarantee of learning might prove that innocence doesn't have to be caused by something that is directly negative or bad feeling.
Primificial Gratif in Rendering Rumination / Innocence and Out of Reach Rumination
Terms to retain my new (and musically relevant) work
Primificial Gratif
.__.__.__._._.__.__.__
here used with a musical pattern that is split repeating on beat 1 and on the upbeat of the odd middle beat.. the extraordinary expression lies identified by its primificial gratif (as split in halves)
in the use of Rendering Rumination
the present focus on reading musical notation or exhibiting the "Primificial Gratif"
which means monitoring on the notation's exhibition by use of a ruminated downbeat scheme, which would be left while returning to the rumination of the preparatory musical notation..
If the scandal proves that a form of rumination (if produced) could suffice to be reckoned as this form that should be allowed to sectioned-off issuing 'blinds' for the making of musical substance.. This arena could for many be one of the first to have occur the makestuff of the pressure of innocence for other special forms of Rendering Rumination, which would be amiss in the portrayal of identity and more, through Activation, which may prove (in reverse) the rumination as a skill upon "primificial gratif" to be excessively easy to procure at certain distinct injunctions.
Additionally the make-stuff of the performance of all Rendering Rumination would be with the whole of most any musical form, certainly a worthy cause for the discovery of more natural forms (especially upon the insistence that a musical or cognizant technique must allow for vital control or access to more free and innocent Rendering Rumination, or Rendering Rumination that produces innocence in exhibition). Remember that it is often too difficult to criticize an institution that is making any performer innocent.. Also new critical cognizant forms may in fact take on their sharer's and audience's crucial state in any given mode of the occurrence of the forms of near innocence that would be to arrive with such talent, meaning that the projection of all musical momentum could be trapped within itself, as only shared from human to human by the levitation of proven innocence. Naturally control here may be acquired through an advanced methodical rendering rumination. It would seem that rendering rumination is secondary to human (edit) -> effort in "delta" (Inspecting Functional Solutions). Be reminded that the obtainment of cognizant delta may be capable of being acquired through issuance of innocence, self-motivated or otherwise, see (Faith <- future posts).
Robert Mayer
Primificial Gratif
.__.__.__._._.__.__.__
here used with a musical pattern that is split repeating on beat 1 and on the upbeat of the odd middle beat.. the extraordinary expression lies identified by its primificial gratif (as split in halves)
in the use of Rendering Rumination
the present focus on reading musical notation or exhibiting the "Primificial Gratif"
which means monitoring on the notation's exhibition by use of a ruminated downbeat scheme, which would be left while returning to the rumination of the preparatory musical notation..
If the scandal proves that a form of rumination (if produced) could suffice to be reckoned as this form that should be allowed to sectioned-off issuing 'blinds' for the making of musical substance.. This arena could for many be one of the first to have occur the makestuff of the pressure of innocence for other special forms of Rendering Rumination, which would be amiss in the portrayal of identity and more, through Activation, which may prove (in reverse) the rumination as a skill upon "primificial gratif" to be excessively easy to procure at certain distinct injunctions.
Additionally the make-stuff of the performance of all Rendering Rumination would be with the whole of most any musical form, certainly a worthy cause for the discovery of more natural forms (especially upon the insistence that a musical or cognizant technique must allow for vital control or access to more free and innocent Rendering Rumination, or Rendering Rumination that produces innocence in exhibition). Remember that it is often too difficult to criticize an institution that is making any performer innocent.. Also new critical cognizant forms may in fact take on their sharer's and audience's crucial state in any given mode of the occurrence of the forms of near innocence that would be to arrive with such talent, meaning that the projection of all musical momentum could be trapped within itself, as only shared from human to human by the levitation of proven innocence. Naturally control here may be acquired through an advanced methodical rendering rumination. It would seem that rendering rumination is secondary to human (edit) -> effort in "delta" (Inspecting Functional Solutions). Be reminded that the obtainment of cognizant delta may be capable of being acquired through issuance of innocence, self-motivated or otherwise, see (Faith <- future posts).
Robert Mayer
The Auto-Vacate Zone, Contiguous Time, Rendering Rumination and Empathizing with the Immediate Past
The Auto-Vacate Zone
0 Separical Initiative (Contiguous Time)
Rendering Rumination
Empathizing with the Immediate Past
Pressure of activation to precede publicly reconnoitered information may very well prepare further adjustments to the imagined! reconnoiterate in pre-empathized notions for stability. This requires information to be balanced in a systematic pattern, a pattern passed over by rendering rumination. The balance allows additional information to be swept into a momentous attempt thereby qualifying information to be traded to the reconnoiterate via calculations in empathy.. I claim that the balance utilizes an activator(b) where-after a person may choose to allow himself to project information in such additional trade as far as it summons a newest-total sum for any attempt by constant potentiation. Our activator(b) is called upon by activation to be a mechanism for regurgitating such necessary qualify-able information, and as I understand it, is also utilized as an auto-vacate threshold that allows estimations of the mind to the summoning of methodical natural common investigation-parts to be summoned to the consciousness (and allows data to become of many potential form instantaneously out of fast recognitions of what they very well are comparably shaped with). Control of this activator(b) could result in rapid summoned estimation, or experience-able (fake)(of the data sort that feeds the empathetic adjusters) rationality, per estimations and collected environmental data.
Some efforts to revive notions of intellect are so levied where and through the utilization of rendering rumination is viable, and they may deliver themselves held by desired co-existence with such rumination (plus in an opinionated form some methods of rumination must seem to allow for better control guidance, but that is part of the performance of technique, not necessarily rumination), and still factors do engage in protection mechanisms to revitalize the stability so that things may be expressed by humans in how only they are capable of participating. Danger in human mega-circuitry may arise with this endo-stability..
Moreover, danger is close to systems that allow observing a non-contiguous time stream.. Given that humanities efforts are primary to rendering rumination (which is secondary), they must vie their efforts for the rationale perhaps even that certain distinct efforts are themselves not willing to invite rumination at all (or its opposite, as maximally) People can only suspect that if they do not believe in a contiguous timestream, their efforts may be performed allowing the Focus Orientation to some select power (and as only rationally wholesome as it sounds- one that does not fit the contiguous timestram) People in this unnatural regard for a non-contiguous timestream may still have megaforth! with identifiable ordinary rendering rumination! In the breadth of power and magic this is a stem for the course of delivery of a correct natural intervention..
Humans are not wise to leave a natural effort which supports the guidance of the empathetic infrastructure of the persistent effort, and yet nor are they wise to make an abuse of the reality of an empathized immediate past.
Robert Mayer
0 Separical Initiative (Contiguous Time)
Rendering Rumination
Empathizing with the Immediate Past
Pressure of activation to precede publicly reconnoitered information may very well prepare further adjustments to the imagined! reconnoiterate in pre-empathized notions for stability. This requires information to be balanced in a systematic pattern, a pattern passed over by rendering rumination. The balance allows additional information to be swept into a momentous attempt thereby qualifying information to be traded to the reconnoiterate via calculations in empathy.. I claim that the balance utilizes an activator(b) where-after a person may choose to allow himself to project information in such additional trade as far as it summons a newest-total sum for any attempt by constant potentiation. Our activator(b) is called upon by activation to be a mechanism for regurgitating such necessary qualify-able information, and as I understand it, is also utilized as an auto-vacate threshold that allows estimations of the mind to the summoning of methodical natural common investigation-parts to be summoned to the consciousness (and allows data to become of many potential form instantaneously out of fast recognitions of what they very well are comparably shaped with). Control of this activator(b) could result in rapid summoned estimation, or experience-able (fake)(of the data sort that feeds the empathetic adjusters) rationality, per estimations and collected environmental data.
Some efforts to revive notions of intellect are so levied where and through the utilization of rendering rumination is viable, and they may deliver themselves held by desired co-existence with such rumination (plus in an opinionated form some methods of rumination must seem to allow for better control guidance, but that is part of the performance of technique, not necessarily rumination), and still factors do engage in protection mechanisms to revitalize the stability so that things may be expressed by humans in how only they are capable of participating. Danger in human mega-circuitry may arise with this endo-stability..
Moreover, danger is close to systems that allow observing a non-contiguous time stream.. Given that humanities efforts are primary to rendering rumination (which is secondary), they must vie their efforts for the rationale perhaps even that certain distinct efforts are themselves not willing to invite rumination at all (or its opposite, as maximally) People can only suspect that if they do not believe in a contiguous timestream, their efforts may be performed allowing the Focus Orientation to some select power (and as only rationally wholesome as it sounds- one that does not fit the contiguous timestram) People in this unnatural regard for a non-contiguous timestream may still have megaforth! with identifiable ordinary rendering rumination! In the breadth of power and magic this is a stem for the course of delivery of a correct natural intervention..
Humans are not wise to leave a natural effort which supports the guidance of the empathetic infrastructure of the persistent effort, and yet nor are they wise to make an abuse of the reality of an empathized immediate past.
Robert Mayer
Rurid Behavior in Effort, Ruridity in Sacrifice / Utilizing an Instrument in Coregulation
Rurid Behavior in Effort, Ruridity in Sacrifice /
Utilizing an Instrument in Coregulation
*edit
Perhaps the best technique is summoned by proven effort. Without relinquishing the demand for prosperous ideality as portrayed in action, humans summon their mechanistic dwelling in activation and the limited ideal fortitude is made plenty as soon as effort is sewn across any itemized perplexity of practice. Some notions with heed to the efforts of the most objectively keen monitoring play haste into the fervency of all encompassed performance and delivery in projection. All delta-provided fixation in effort and then all available activity of rendering rumination are as one, by the grant of esteem, civilized to readiness by creature will.
In the most trained techniques, exhibition of effort and rumination must be ecologically external operational partners with 1. the creation of effort that allows better facilitation of effort and rumination 2. the creation of rumination that better allows facilitation of effort and rumination. These dimensions 1. and 2. can be pivotal at the heart of a status, what I call Rurid Behavior, meaning behavior at its most pivotal and crucial wholesomely harmonious (recurring) identity and hence where this behavior is most subject-able to the processes of justification (or correction?) of inertia.
In the conditions born through the failure of effort and rumination to evolve (entertainingly so) due to lack of conduct or innocence, an observation should be held that more long-term rurid behavior may seem to be counter-productive (even instantaneously so) to diversity and therefore evolution to entertaining grades of effort. *This is because in hindsight lack of innocence/conduct can be mistaken for rurid behavior. Justification of control here may help assume that there are more beneficial mechanisms for the usurpation of musical effort, (Co-regulation : Inspecting Functional Solutions).
Robert Mayer
Utilizing an Instrument in Coregulation
*edit
Perhaps the best technique is summoned by proven effort. Without relinquishing the demand for prosperous ideality as portrayed in action, humans summon their mechanistic dwelling in activation and the limited ideal fortitude is made plenty as soon as effort is sewn across any itemized perplexity of practice. Some notions with heed to the efforts of the most objectively keen monitoring play haste into the fervency of all encompassed performance and delivery in projection. All delta-provided fixation in effort and then all available activity of rendering rumination are as one, by the grant of esteem, civilized to readiness by creature will.
In the most trained techniques, exhibition of effort and rumination must be ecologically external operational partners with 1. the creation of effort that allows better facilitation of effort and rumination 2. the creation of rumination that better allows facilitation of effort and rumination. These dimensions 1. and 2. can be pivotal at the heart of a status, what I call Rurid Behavior, meaning behavior at its most pivotal and crucial wholesomely harmonious (recurring) identity and hence where this behavior is most subject-able to the processes of justification (or correction?) of inertia.
In the conditions born through the failure of effort and rumination to evolve (entertainingly so) due to lack of conduct or innocence, an observation should be held that more long-term rurid behavior may seem to be counter-productive (even instantaneously so) to diversity and therefore evolution to entertaining grades of effort. *This is because in hindsight lack of innocence/conduct can be mistaken for rurid behavior. Justification of control here may help assume that there are more beneficial mechanisms for the usurpation of musical effort, (Co-regulation : Inspecting Functional Solutions).
Robert Mayer
Mansfiscation During Examined Ruridity / Play-Pensives
Mansfiscation (Finding and Controling A Bodily Chroniciology)
To the identity of an effort-commanding individual, prominence is of the focal hindsight. Force then can be said to be of the superstitious present self. Sight of the implications of the human potential are to the rurid participator, finds of special interest due to how a rurid participator may obey his interests in coveting more (most) brutal rationale for causing and inviting insight. All forces to obtain a manifesting standpoint over the actions of the rurid participator allow "Mansfiscation", or the participator's editing and total-ization of acute mechanism in an effort to charge with an objective purpose to moralize, prepare and create the opportune future self. The ruridity is at an exact mention here, because exclusive behavior commits truancy since the brevity of will arises at the immediate cause.
Play-Pensives in Rendering Rumination
To those with whom the power of belief holds a conquering stance, a mixed relegation might be seen, religiously, as possible where a human could access his rendering rumination as theo-secondary. (Rendering Rumination is secondary to effort) This is not to argue that there must exist a rendering rumination compository, yet this as a standard could be mentioned for the prosperity of the exact intentions to access such rumination without primary effort. This with the ruse of play-pensives might be allocatable. Rendering the (exhaustiveness) or some other such exaggeration-type or play-provocation behavior physically binding its instrumentalist through artificial recreation (Inspecting Functional Solutions) could provoke a detailed character as summoned (practiced) that leads to a vast comfort without so much as challenging access to a respectful audience to rendering rumination.
Robert Mayer
I truly forget if there should be an i in ruiridity (would rurid mean the same thing?)
To the identity of an effort-commanding individual, prominence is of the focal hindsight. Force then can be said to be of the superstitious present self. Sight of the implications of the human potential are to the rurid participator, finds of special interest due to how a rurid participator may obey his interests in coveting more (most) brutal rationale for causing and inviting insight. All forces to obtain a manifesting standpoint over the actions of the rurid participator allow "Mansfiscation", or the participator's editing and total-ization of acute mechanism in an effort to charge with an objective purpose to moralize, prepare and create the opportune future self. The ruridity is at an exact mention here, because exclusive behavior commits truancy since the brevity of will arises at the immediate cause.
Play-Pensives in Rendering Rumination
To those with whom the power of belief holds a conquering stance, a mixed relegation might be seen, religiously, as possible where a human could access his rendering rumination as theo-secondary. (Rendering Rumination is secondary to effort) This is not to argue that there must exist a rendering rumination compository, yet this as a standard could be mentioned for the prosperity of the exact intentions to access such rumination without primary effort. This with the ruse of play-pensives might be allocatable. Rendering the (exhaustiveness) or some other such exaggeration-type or play-provocation behavior physically binding its instrumentalist through artificial recreation (Inspecting Functional Solutions) could provoke a detailed character as summoned (practiced) that leads to a vast comfort without so much as challenging access to a respectful audience to rendering rumination.
Robert Mayer
I truly forget if there should be an i in ruiridity (would rurid mean the same thing?)
Revitalization of Truth in Monition, Ergonomics
Before the beginnings of any ecological fault in monition, an honor by monition's esteem may prove to serve(require) a proficient determination in the transformation of self. In honor, all degrees of allocation of wealth to effort may relegate the needs of the self to transform any better than those whom cannot begin anew the lost presence of allocation(correction) of free will in open spite readiness, or there from such provincial peace cause and result a return to innocence.
A derelict, whom we may rely on as a person, has only his own effort to show for his behavior, and traditionally then when some person or force remains after any ability to prepare the "gate" for transformation (reviving free will positioning / becoming innocent) there is a fervent resolution that some conditional of data obstruction will arise before some such opportune dedication arrests those obstructing processes and entails a commencement of transformation by reliance.
Why does a person have difficulty transforming?
No such opportune wisdom may bring itself closer to the reasons why a person must feel the "muster" of realization in becoming innocent, and no grand expense plays into the attitude that may nullify some stance via additional-ization before the completion of a vexation may announce itself to dull the will of our fervency. He (the resolver) is only an animate cough in the bouts of our auto-vacate threshold and as he can be the resolver of many things, an analytic approach to the survival of all made-live attempts to transform can result in a partial enigmotence of the hyper totality in civilization of processes that are prepared by the empathetic simulator (one which has audience through rumination). These crucial elements could have themselves standing as potent forces for the beleaguering of effort that stands to prove away one's ability to take a transformation for what it is, and live with the effort to repair and collect.
A derelict, whom we may rely on as a person, has only his own effort to show for his behavior, and traditionally then when some person or force remains after any ability to prepare the "gate" for transformation (reviving free will positioning / becoming innocent) there is a fervent resolution that some conditional of data obstruction will arise before some such opportune dedication arrests those obstructing processes and entails a commencement of transformation by reliance.
Why does a person have difficulty transforming?
No such opportune wisdom may bring itself closer to the reasons why a person must feel the "muster" of realization in becoming innocent, and no grand expense plays into the attitude that may nullify some stance via additional-ization before the completion of a vexation may announce itself to dull the will of our fervency. He (the resolver) is only an animate cough in the bouts of our auto-vacate threshold and as he can be the resolver of many things, an analytic approach to the survival of all made-live attempts to transform can result in a partial enigmotence of the hyper totality in civilization of processes that are prepared by the empathetic simulator (one which has audience through rumination). These crucial elements could have themselves standing as potent forces for the beleaguering of effort that stands to prove away one's ability to take a transformation for what it is, and live with the effort to repair and collect.
Rendering Rumination in Performing Like Acts "Better"
Superstition may carry in the wake of the fortitude of comfort in the minds of how many dependable people there really are. Still then, however, none sit at the behest of a guiding fairy fool who proves his invocation as a sleeping reference to where and how some amount of like action may be related to its conception-sent counterparts. And perhaps a reference to how some certain action has come to detail the plenty thought spaces of a FAMILY would not serve us at all. Perhaps this reference in wake would knock us free of some binding esprit whose message was all too clearly void of the abstract's living passion to have it be accomplished far throughout the way.
Attitude in the efforts to sustain comprehensible monition safely would be full of abstract color but in fact the opportunity in wisdom to repeat the functions of that necessity has itself at a loss wherever the reams show what is in fact an intrepid ploy to render a particular attitude. The make of any prior-made stuff of the relay of information that has come before, that stands to be made a function whose deliverance carries what is more blankness before a project-able, false esteem and attitude [so that some formidable human should try to improve the expressions as realer, bigger, finer, more readily, farther established, etc. - should carry its mark clearly as information that we should not believe in.
We carry all proprietary rendering rumination that is the real-time dwelling over talent, of knowledge that is siditious to the reign of the information more guarded as true and naturally attitude-developing. I claim this force for performing some ritual with "better" wake or emotion than found in its introductory performance can happen where rendering rumination strikes only the calm findings that this action of ritual is made of a substance of a cool EFFORTABLE, ATTITUDABLE fakeness.
Attitude in the efforts to sustain comprehensible monition safely would be full of abstract color but in fact the opportunity in wisdom to repeat the functions of that necessity has itself at a loss wherever the reams show what is in fact an intrepid ploy to render a particular attitude. The make of any prior-made stuff of the relay of information that has come before, that stands to be made a function whose deliverance carries what is more blankness before a project-able, false esteem and attitude [so that some formidable human should try to improve the expressions as realer, bigger, finer, more readily, farther established, etc. - should carry its mark clearly as information that we should not believe in.
We carry all proprietary rendering rumination that is the real-time dwelling over talent, of knowledge that is siditious to the reign of the information more guarded as true and naturally attitude-developing. I claim this force for performing some ritual with "better" wake or emotion than found in its introductory performance can happen where rendering rumination strikes only the calm findings that this action of ritual is made of a substance of a cool EFFORTABLE, ATTITUDABLE fakeness.
Rendering Rumination, Activation Before/After Central Exclusivity
Rendering Rumination, Activation Before/After Central Exclusivity
*edit 3/30
Expenses of energy by esteem are the bringers of the monitions that are relays for choice and understanding. This activation is occurring upon the flesh and its hold on thinking is so beyond how it can come to relay processes, to where it can be so much as felt as human. (A dedication to ideals that people have pensive recurrences and that these are a special force for the motivation to recreate about a "free thinking" rigorousness have enlightened the course of cooperation for the masses.)
Much solid activation will not be possessed by the effects of a worry that central exclusivity to a process can change the way a human runs that expeditia to survival, but some degree of central exclusivity by purveying a mechanism, and more of its type (champure), (doiletral), could play forwards into mechanisms for how an observer of such activation may think he/she wills and also retains innocence to such mechanisms. Rendering rumination can (even) be found in the parts of a system resulting with much clairvoyance as [knowing what eventually could subliminally casts effort away from what would] cause a clean dedication to any effort in delta, pre-worry, and [this] in dedication formation can clearly be found to maximize a new trend in activation -> the reflex to find or discover proof for how such effort can be found at terminals with our potentially contaminated triviality. This reflex is ultimately how such interference could be realized, summoned, imagined.. (Some efforts may be vastly and deeply affected by central exclusivity in experience and also therefore perhaps by rendering rumination) Dedication to an effort would not in all cases mean un-expandably limited esteem for all other effort.
*edit 3/30
Expenses of energy by esteem are the bringers of the monitions that are relays for choice and understanding. This activation is occurring upon the flesh and its hold on thinking is so beyond how it can come to relay processes, to where it can be so much as felt as human. (A dedication to ideals that people have pensive recurrences and that these are a special force for the motivation to recreate about a "free thinking" rigorousness have enlightened the course of cooperation for the masses.)
Much solid activation will not be possessed by the effects of a worry that central exclusivity to a process can change the way a human runs that expeditia to survival, but some degree of central exclusivity by purveying a mechanism, and more of its type (champure), (doiletral), could play forwards into mechanisms for how an observer of such activation may think he/she wills and also retains innocence to such mechanisms. Rendering rumination can (even) be found in the parts of a system resulting with much clairvoyance as [knowing what eventually could subliminally casts effort away from what would] cause a clean dedication to any effort in delta, pre-worry, and [this] in dedication formation can clearly be found to maximize a new trend in activation -> the reflex to find or discover proof for how such effort can be found at terminals with our potentially contaminated triviality. This reflex is ultimately how such interference could be realized, summoned, imagined.. (Some efforts may be vastly and deeply affected by central exclusivity in experience and also therefore perhaps by rendering rumination) Dedication to an effort would not in all cases mean un-expandably limited esteem for all other effort.
What is Human? Resolved Rendering Rumination Priorities
What is Human? Resolved Rendering Rumination Priorities
Upon the semblance that all cases of normal superstition guarantee warrant, utilizations of favoritism can be seen eventually guarding the physical proclamation with the detail that only necessary (&mental) acrobatics can solve.
A genial multi-stage esteem with cordial rationale would be right to manipulate a control over more than the fairest of intentions, it would rationally contest a valiance through its moving covet-ings wherever systematic allowances forgive. A knowing free thinking master of ideals can be the final obsession of the wholesome pattern that is created, and always as long as this revered gift-totality survives about the thresholds of normality. In any case the master of ideals can be the humorous critical assertion that is fabricated from about; then fabricated when a person begins to assume that "he" does in fact control the blessing of constancy of [action and counteraction] that abides only by how allowances forgive, that is, after given enough time. Such a dedication to wisdom could not exist (due to second nature) as evidenced by material artistic endeavor. [A total human is the collection of what stubborn success has brought to a separate nuance, that stages of a summarized intuition actually pronounce a working identity, with concentrated appliance by particular gestation of memory]
We are shown how to seem to be required to covet the assert-able free guarantee of humanity and of course in justification of inertia we as human are so sustainable through communication and assertion in agreeing that we prepare static revolutions of the self. (Census Intellect vs Intellectual Hardening) Our set-up remains however in the field with how such revolutionizing of the self is probably not to be seen as a focus orientation (I'm 24?). It could be rendering rumination that allows people to understand how they as humans may derive grips over their coveting controls.. Yet once they "possess" their coveting controls they are ones to begin the intellectual compensation that they are in fact, human. Humans are machinations that begin to decide to run the mechanisms within, including those effort and rendering rumination.
Understandably as the mind comes to find that it knows rendering rumination can exist only with created effort, it may use the stage knowledge of what it thinks it is to find it needs sustained participation in order to continue its processes. So, humans already have a steadily-adapting esteem and at objectification of esteem thereafter may be found in non-performance-wondering how they could have MORE or BETTER rendering rumination than others. They must see to this, especially with regards to having more real-time RR just because they have been devoid of any stylistically relevant RR. The individual realization that someone has more or less rendering rumination resulting from how they are pure or devoid of rendering rumination is at hand..
Comparisons (between) for the betterment of effort and rendering rumination will hold central exclusivity to this design; mobilization does not require the relative absence of rendering rumination and therefore I suggest it is useless to consider how being pure of rendering rumination can afford more or better rendering rumination..
Upon the semblance that all cases of normal superstition guarantee warrant, utilizations of favoritism can be seen eventually guarding the physical proclamation with the detail that only necessary (&mental) acrobatics can solve.
A genial multi-stage esteem with cordial rationale would be right to manipulate a control over more than the fairest of intentions, it would rationally contest a valiance through its moving covet-ings wherever systematic allowances forgive. A knowing free thinking master of ideals can be the final obsession of the wholesome pattern that is created, and always as long as this revered gift-totality survives about the thresholds of normality. In any case the master of ideals can be the humorous critical assertion that is fabricated from about; then fabricated when a person begins to assume that "he" does in fact control the blessing of constancy of [action and counteraction] that abides only by how allowances forgive, that is, after given enough time. Such a dedication to wisdom could not exist (due to second nature) as evidenced by material artistic endeavor. [A total human is the collection of what stubborn success has brought to a separate nuance, that stages of a summarized intuition actually pronounce a working identity, with concentrated appliance by particular gestation of memory]
We are shown how to seem to be required to covet the assert-able free guarantee of humanity and of course in justification of inertia we as human are so sustainable through communication and assertion in agreeing that we prepare static revolutions of the self. (Census Intellect vs Intellectual Hardening) Our set-up remains however in the field with how such revolutionizing of the self is probably not to be seen as a focus orientation (I'm 24?). It could be rendering rumination that allows people to understand how they as humans may derive grips over their coveting controls.. Yet once they "possess" their coveting controls they are ones to begin the intellectual compensation that they are in fact, human. Humans are machinations that begin to decide to run the mechanisms within, including those effort and rendering rumination.
Understandably as the mind comes to find that it knows rendering rumination can exist only with created effort, it may use the stage knowledge of what it thinks it is to find it needs sustained participation in order to continue its processes. So, humans already have a steadily-adapting esteem and at objectification of esteem thereafter may be found in non-performance-wondering how they could have MORE or BETTER rendering rumination than others. They must see to this, especially with regards to having more real-time RR just because they have been devoid of any stylistically relevant RR. The individual realization that someone has more or less rendering rumination resulting from how they are pure or devoid of rendering rumination is at hand..
Comparisons (between) for the betterment of effort and rendering rumination will hold central exclusivity to this design; mobilization does not require the relative absence of rendering rumination and therefore I suggest it is useless to consider how being pure of rendering rumination can afford more or better rendering rumination..
Purgator's Effect
So far in this blog I have high-lit some of the overall human condition in the makeup of actions of many through the limits of occurrence due to innocence in the ecological spectrum. Here i mean to speak of a turn-up pattern in innocence that I've politely called the Purgator's Effect.
In the instance where a two-delegation reminiscence factored by humans wounds deployed to the major public, based in a bilateral tournament or option which will be eventually based in the past (the future is independent of its more dependent past), one structured lasting critical-izaton in Synthreafaction leads open ended risks at a more square resolution. Due to contiguity in the time stream, the only time-stream, mitigial risk is proven secondary to larger substantial risk in how wherever the ab-sense of formative regency cannot let there be held systematic perspective for the bilateral tournament BY THE INNOCENT - and that is no look to whether or not the Purgator's Effect has been particular only to the presses of Civilization. All talent portrayed by units of any mitigial opinion (during hindsight) must be found in innocence by their relative instantia, meaning therefore that the conclusively winning troop of a concentrated judgement is typically of a conclusive dichotomous essense, there being a reliantvictor and a clause-chosen-host for the guaranteeing of all free spite readiness where how the contestable subjected alter-priority must exist wielding temperment, which thus must cause transformation (becoming innocent). This should be a liturgical factor in who people think any real victor in choice is,, additionally this effect can be seen as compounding over and over again, thereafter letting remain the force of reckoning power that we as humans refer to as OFFICIAL-ness.
In the instance where a two-delegation reminiscence factored by humans wounds deployed to the major public, based in a bilateral tournament or option which will be eventually based in the past (the future is independent of its more dependent past), one structured lasting critical-izaton in Synthreafaction leads open ended risks at a more square resolution. Due to contiguity in the time stream, the only time-stream, mitigial risk is proven secondary to larger substantial risk in how wherever the ab-sense of formative regency cannot let there be held systematic perspective for the bilateral tournament BY THE INNOCENT - and that is no look to whether or not the Purgator's Effect has been particular only to the presses of Civilization. All talent portrayed by units of any mitigial opinion (during hindsight) must be found in innocence by their relative instantia, meaning therefore that the conclusively winning troop of a concentrated judgement is typically of a conclusive dichotomous essense, there being a reliantvictor and a clause-chosen-host for the guaranteeing of all free spite readiness where how the contestable subjected alter-priority must exist wielding temperment, which thus must cause transformation (becoming innocent). This should be a liturgical factor in who people think any real victor in choice is,, additionally this effect can be seen as compounding over and over again, thereafter letting remain the force of reckoning power that we as humans refer to as OFFICIAL-ness.
Satiating Constituted Delta of Preparation for Occurrence(Non- Occuring Topiary) When Near After it's Simple Parallel Occuring, Topiary Facility
Satiating Constituted Delta of Preparation for Occurrence(Non-Topiary) When Near After it's Simple Parallel Topiary Facility
Situated delta may arise keenly bestowing natural impressions upon the user of the light at any time.. Often the wisdom of an ephemeral guilt will carry into prosperous Topiary Conclusion as well. At it's will I believe that able force in where a topiary expectation has failed to come to pass can be seen to fit with a special form of satiation (semi-transformation) (to cause transformed, permanent remission of talent) . The will readiness of the captive ideals that have been invested into the related hypothetical chronological setup shall be contained in a stationary salute to feel like an investment itself. Remember, ideals are not of themselves, traitorous, but a resumption upon their likely tactility and futility as transformed inertia could show the worth of our attention to such detail.
Situated delta may arise keenly bestowing natural impressions upon the user of the light at any time.. Often the wisdom of an ephemeral guilt will carry into prosperous Topiary Conclusion as well. At it's will I believe that able force in where a topiary expectation has failed to come to pass can be seen to fit with a special form of satiation (semi-transformation) (to cause transformed, permanent remission of talent) . The will readiness of the captive ideals that have been invested into the related hypothetical chronological setup shall be contained in a stationary salute to feel like an investment itself. Remember, ideals are not of themselves, traitorous, but a resumption upon their likely tactility and futility as transformed inertia could show the worth of our attention to such detail.
Magicians, Sypnohanial Retrouf
Sypnohanial Retrouf
In the midsts of the lengths of ignorance we can see far enough to beguile ourselves with inferences of satiation, settled poise and comfort, etc. Master conciliators have us at length because of what we only observe in real time, and in the opportunity of this disparity we can be made to procure our own visceral experience at the behest of this magician's pattern of swaying an audience into observing patterns of "trick after trick" exposure.. The extent of what folds to be seen by either party is what lies behind a pattern of Sypnohanial Retrouf.
Underpinnings in the delegation of talent to allow a magician to "transform" (become innocent) to pass mitigial wavering and absolutist environmental foreign propaganda will cast a ream of intellectually pursued virtuousness upon such a magician. Channels for relegation would have to be experienced by the make of chosen spirit (practice).
The term Sypnohanial Retrouf would be cast referring to all efforts to build a dimensional (internal / external) relevance through mitigation, claiming an appropriate measure of transformation and magician's conclusion. The internal structure would be a canonical set of messages as inclusive so far as it creates the external sets of public-ally value-able process. In the intuitive mentalities of any proper audience, there is, I claim, a sceptical intelligent analysis of the mastery of Sypnohanial Retrouf about the efforts of one magician. Our intelligence as audience brings us far enough to aquedize our own {pertinent} methodical judgement WITH SYPNOHANIAL RETROUF in mind. A magicians expertise may encounter means to {tamper}with such audience's calculations.. Also this audience's analysis can be steadily erroneous, and an expert magician must be at lengths with also using an awareness of the audiences same somewhat fanciful analysis (requiring empathy) as a factor in the assembling (rotigation) maneuver.
{relegation here is not too directly intrusive, only ecologically indirectly intrusive}
Rob Mayer
In the midsts of the lengths of ignorance we can see far enough to beguile ourselves with inferences of satiation, settled poise and comfort, etc. Master conciliators have us at length because of what we only observe in real time, and in the opportunity of this disparity we can be made to procure our own visceral experience at the behest of this magician's pattern of swaying an audience into observing patterns of "trick after trick" exposure.. The extent of what folds to be seen by either party is what lies behind a pattern of Sypnohanial Retrouf.
Underpinnings in the delegation of talent to allow a magician to "transform" (become innocent) to pass mitigial wavering and absolutist environmental foreign propaganda will cast a ream of intellectually pursued virtuousness upon such a magician. Channels for relegation would have to be experienced by the make of chosen spirit (practice).
The term Sypnohanial Retrouf would be cast referring to all efforts to build a dimensional (internal / external) relevance through mitigation, claiming an appropriate measure of transformation and magician's conclusion. The internal structure would be a canonical set of messages as inclusive so far as it creates the external sets of public-ally value-able process. In the intuitive mentalities of any proper audience, there is, I claim, a sceptical intelligent analysis of the mastery of Sypnohanial Retrouf about the efforts of one magician. Our intelligence as audience brings us far enough to aquedize our own {pertinent} methodical judgement WITH SYPNOHANIAL RETROUF in mind. A magicians expertise may encounter means to {tamper}with such audience's calculations.. Also this audience's analysis can be steadily erroneous, and an expert magician must be at lengths with also using an awareness of the audiences same somewhat fanciful analysis (requiring empathy) as a factor in the assembling (rotigation) maneuver.
{relegation here is not too directly intrusive, only ecologically indirectly intrusive}
Rob Mayer
Handling/Skipping Grid Opportunity Pre-Factualization *edit
Handling/Skipping Grid Opportunity Pre-Factualization
Pre-regulated opportunity shows (to the self) time producing the potential admittance of fortification in the occupation of role in the standard environment (opportunity). People can manifest (utilize) the pre-sight to exclude or include the self in estimated standard participation throughout, empirically. This inclusion or exclusion is probably on hand, in Synthreafaction (all action requisites contiguous factuality in time)(Inspecting Functional Solutions) at the responsibility of further detailed (specifically detailed therein) propensity. (free will in decisive participation is controllable and chosen by exclusive propensity management.) All vindictive time occurs on a temporal grid and when the grid (synthreafaction) offers grid power (Acting Point), it can sometimes be fairly neglected through use of very methodical strategies based with MORE FREE WILL at the editing of pre-subjected argument propensity, with SEPARATE FREE WILL at near-instantaneous temporal decision. This means that pre-factually-conclusive notions made can be in the mitigation of decision structure. Explaining a decision structure here must rely on the pre-factualization of speculative original basis (1) and the eventual close-dystopia conclusiveness's hindsight to recognize that the contiguous effort is to show a "close" mutation (2).
Involvement in priority-made inclusion is mandated by perceptions pre-argument, and founded by the way these perceptions and arguments play out. To play a more special and detailed explanation, I would regard all decisiveness to the after-hand methodology.. People traverse duty by no experimental attempt, they will (if) mend when the forces after-the-fact have become mathematically (conclusively in innocence) eluded to, (and for lack of a better term) factualized, in clean synthreafaction. (2 : After the Mutation Viewpoint) People do not so much opt their way out of decisions, they are held by forces (by propensity) who bring them to the exact future they are headed on to. People can (in small topiary conclusion) exit the self-de-participation around a solidifying future by eliminating(including) themselves from diagrammatic participation, even by will derived after the eventuality of such diagrammatic participation. People that handle or exhibit quitting (truncating)behavior may find the will to express their intentions to shy towards ably exhibiting participation by controlling these maneuvers.
In the after-handed methodology, propensity has ruled all deciciveness, made all decisions and comforted no pass of ruridity; meanwhile, propensity control can be made to let decisions be of much more thought breadth. All action is the result of dependence or reliance on factual basis in synthreafaction. (Reliantists? The Reliantist Passion?) All human future relies on the efficacy of human interrelation, therefore all agreement is reliant on the basis of decisions. Some would think that slow dissipation of topiary conclusion occurs, it does not. In one contiguous time-stream, all humans are incarnated dampening the forces of wielding primordial nature by how they instituted their separation from each other, which was eventual, not necessary. Our control of such bleak premises can be sought to say that we as human's only edit propensity based in activation controlled by propensity.. Still is my purpose, to find how we shall obtain the innocence and talent to become more with this ability to control the diagrammatically manufactured means of fearing convincing provincial attitude to control propensities.
By the disparity in the extent and perceived amount of artificial recreation in behavior (See IFS) a person could have much less or much more than observed talent or providence, we can also deem through and by this property to the trainumvariate (IFS) that tactility should be proven and estimated between free peoples before responsibility is warranted.
Pre-regulated opportunity shows (to the self) time producing the potential admittance of fortification in the occupation of role in the standard environment (opportunity). People can manifest (utilize) the pre-sight to exclude or include the self in estimated standard participation throughout, empirically. This inclusion or exclusion is probably on hand, in Synthreafaction (all action requisites contiguous factuality in time)(Inspecting Functional Solutions) at the responsibility of further detailed (specifically detailed therein) propensity. (free will in decisive participation is controllable and chosen by exclusive propensity management.) All vindictive time occurs on a temporal grid and when the grid (synthreafaction) offers grid power (Acting Point), it can sometimes be fairly neglected through use of very methodical strategies based with MORE FREE WILL at the editing of pre-subjected argument propensity, with SEPARATE FREE WILL at near-instantaneous temporal decision. This means that pre-factually-conclusive notions made can be in the mitigation of decision structure. Explaining a decision structure here must rely on the pre-factualization of speculative original basis (1) and the eventual close-dystopia conclusiveness's hindsight to recognize that the contiguous effort is to show a "close" mutation (2).
Involvement in priority-made inclusion is mandated by perceptions pre-argument, and founded by the way these perceptions and arguments play out. To play a more special and detailed explanation, I would regard all decisiveness to the after-hand methodology.. People traverse duty by no experimental attempt, they will (if) mend when the forces after-the-fact have become mathematically (conclusively in innocence) eluded to, (and for lack of a better term) factualized, in clean synthreafaction. (2 : After the Mutation Viewpoint) People do not so much opt their way out of decisions, they are held by forces (by propensity) who bring them to the exact future they are headed on to. People can (in small topiary conclusion) exit the self-de-participation around a solidifying future by eliminating(including) themselves from diagrammatic participation, even by will derived after the eventuality of such diagrammatic participation. People that handle or exhibit quitting (truncating)behavior may find the will to express their intentions to shy towards ably exhibiting participation by controlling these maneuvers.
In the after-handed methodology, propensity has ruled all deciciveness, made all decisions and comforted no pass of ruridity; meanwhile, propensity control can be made to let decisions be of much more thought breadth. All action is the result of dependence or reliance on factual basis in synthreafaction. (Reliantists? The Reliantist Passion?) All human future relies on the efficacy of human interrelation, therefore all agreement is reliant on the basis of decisions. Some would think that slow dissipation of topiary conclusion occurs, it does not. In one contiguous time-stream, all humans are incarnated dampening the forces of wielding primordial nature by how they instituted their separation from each other, which was eventual, not necessary. Our control of such bleak premises can be sought to say that we as human's only edit propensity based in activation controlled by propensity.. Still is my purpose, to find how we shall obtain the innocence and talent to become more with this ability to control the diagrammatically manufactured means of fearing convincing provincial attitude to control propensities.
By the disparity in the extent and perceived amount of artificial recreation in behavior (See IFS) a person could have much less or much more than observed talent or providence, we can also deem through and by this property to the trainumvariate (IFS) that tactility should be proven and estimated between free peoples before responsibility is warranted.
Proper Conjunction, Weight Power of Conclusive Probability (Zi-Focal Pedality) (Time)
(Zi-Focal Pedality)
In response to the changes in human synthreafaction at all ends, more changes will occur, though this should be seen within the lens of "zi-focal pedality". Certain devices within synthreafaction become encumberments that bring more totality of fact-flex pulling to realization. (Some focality occurs with highly probable factualization and some focality occurs after its lighter and less probable factualization is weighed against the main focality.) This means that not only does the pulling occurrence-based probability of action make amends in the contiguous time-stream, but all transformations (becoming innocent) thereafter weigh in steadily as ordered (in hindsight we could particularize how noticeably patterned by strength of probability) for control in the synthreafaction that occurs wherever possible, making changes in fate wherever these transformations can be utilized as fact-putting. This means that dictations, injunctions, transformations etc. of many can be riddled into the particular present-making of truth if they begin their propensity to affect factuality or even major institutions. Since the passing of time is only a quaint measure of fabrication, proper elements of the visibility of finding any actual "change" are at the hands of our "zi-focal pedality". A Demi-God's inference that some truth might occur does not make such an inference real or conclusive or factual, so certain bands and strings of occurrences, forgiven that they MUST occur first, happen out of a transient mechanism for actualization and realization.
Robert Mayer
In response to the changes in human synthreafaction at all ends, more changes will occur, though this should be seen within the lens of "zi-focal pedality". Certain devices within synthreafaction become encumberments that bring more totality of fact-flex pulling to realization. (Some focality occurs with highly probable factualization and some focality occurs after its lighter and less probable factualization is weighed against the main focality.) This means that not only does the pulling occurrence-based probability of action make amends in the contiguous time-stream, but all transformations (becoming innocent) thereafter weigh in steadily as ordered (in hindsight we could particularize how noticeably patterned by strength of probability) for control in the synthreafaction that occurs wherever possible, making changes in fate wherever these transformations can be utilized as fact-putting. This means that dictations, injunctions, transformations etc. of many can be riddled into the particular present-making of truth if they begin their propensity to affect factuality or even major institutions. Since the passing of time is only a quaint measure of fabrication, proper elements of the visibility of finding any actual "change" are at the hands of our "zi-focal pedality". A Demi-God's inference that some truth might occur does not make such an inference real or conclusive or factual, so certain bands and strings of occurrences, forgiven that they MUST occur first, happen out of a transient mechanism for actualization and realization.
Robert Mayer
Effects of Innocence on Zi-Focal Pedality
Effects of Innocence about Zi-Focal Pedality
Some principles(of Zi-Focal Pedality) state that many effects will be incurred in the formation of actuality (synthreafaction). Lingering around as property to the sustenance of time is a league of situated practicality to be observed. We must administer registration (asunder) that so long as all mitigial leagues (company) are laid by the base frame of human action, that some extent of human action will remain guaranteed by fate(contiguity) to occur as primary to the reconciliation by conglomerates that many people consider "economic" subject. This explanation of Zi-Focal Pedality relies on the assumption that considerable action in human synthreafaction can affect both the past and future.
It is not so that at the very depths of human control, that novel factors of outlying habit procure "as new" only so much as to cause verifiably partially identical and only slightly remarkable differences in the story of human synthreafaction. Take this for instance, if something had gone at all slightly differently before your birth( you, the audience) each and every single human birth afterwards would be a totally new and separately created human.. You would never exist, and at this opportunity to ponder, please note that there would not be a 97% you, in the sense that your (ephicocal) replacement would play out 97% percent of your exact story.
Still, take one instance of a blind human situation, one where family contiguity lies vulnerably observable to the minds of its audience (and us).. This family would be prone to be close to the actualization of their mitten worths all begging (diagramatically, of course) to participate THE WAY THEY WOULD, given that persons of the story would be very apt to perform in a certain way.
History could be implied to course by just how much of a McThanner your great grandson Chargey McThanner turns out to be.. He, due to dialectic contiguity, could be guaranteed to be ever so x(adjective) that in reality a seemingly separate bout of infractable challenge would be at the hope of synthreafaction. (Keep in mind that much is at stake here as humans dutifully perform their family names) This is telling of many families who live amidst the properties of man, and we should admit that so long as factors engage the template of human behavior available, we can continue to assert statements as true. So long as we rely on this family (ours) to mechanistically claim all things that are fundamentally machinations of humanity, these machinations will occur secondary (Zi-Focal Pedality) to the actions of the innocent. (Some innocence is so non-pre-meditated, that it is of such probability that it simply occurs in synthreafaction.)
Robert Mayer
I don't know any McThanner 's out there I just assume its a good name for the explanation..
Some principles(of Zi-Focal Pedality) state that many effects will be incurred in the formation of actuality (synthreafaction). Lingering around as property to the sustenance of time is a league of situated practicality to be observed. We must administer registration (asunder) that so long as all mitigial leagues (company) are laid by the base frame of human action, that some extent of human action will remain guaranteed by fate(contiguity) to occur as primary to the reconciliation by conglomerates that many people consider "economic" subject. This explanation of Zi-Focal Pedality relies on the assumption that considerable action in human synthreafaction can affect both the past and future.
It is not so that at the very depths of human control, that novel factors of outlying habit procure "as new" only so much as to cause verifiably partially identical and only slightly remarkable differences in the story of human synthreafaction. Take this for instance, if something had gone at all slightly differently before your birth( you, the audience) each and every single human birth afterwards would be a totally new and separately created human.. You would never exist, and at this opportunity to ponder, please note that there would not be a 97% you, in the sense that your (ephicocal) replacement would play out 97% percent of your exact story.
Still, take one instance of a blind human situation, one where family contiguity lies vulnerably observable to the minds of its audience (and us).. This family would be prone to be close to the actualization of their mitten worths all begging (diagramatically, of course) to participate THE WAY THEY WOULD, given that persons of the story would be very apt to perform in a certain way.
History could be implied to course by just how much of a McThanner your great grandson Chargey McThanner turns out to be.. He, due to dialectic contiguity, could be guaranteed to be ever so x(adjective) that in reality a seemingly separate bout of infractable challenge would be at the hope of synthreafaction. (Keep in mind that much is at stake here as humans dutifully perform their family names) This is telling of many families who live amidst the properties of man, and we should admit that so long as factors engage the template of human behavior available, we can continue to assert statements as true. So long as we rely on this family (ours) to mechanistically claim all things that are fundamentally machinations of humanity, these machinations will occur secondary (Zi-Focal Pedality) to the actions of the innocent. (Some innocence is so non-pre-meditated, that it is of such probability that it simply occurs in synthreafaction.)
Robert Mayer
I don't know any McThanner 's out there I just assume its a good name for the explanation..
Primary and Secondary Nature of Names in Zi-Focal Pedality
Primary and Secondary Nature of Names in Zi-Focal Pedality
By the nature of how instrumental any evidential application of vocabulary (nominal) upon chosen main truths, held dear in the system of names in any present language, such relegation does have a two-part, parallel pattern for conciliation.. Some nominal mitigial wealth plays powerfully into the make stuff of our words, and therefore some names carrying information by probability of occurrence (in Zi-Focal Pedality) in synthreafaction are secondary to a primary human behavior, and some names are primary to secondary human behavioral information. I deem it is not simple nor easy to decipher whether or not the information and message carried in names themselves are primary or secondary to human behavioral information in probability of occurence (Zi-Focal Pedality)
By the nature of how instrumental any evidential application of vocabulary (nominal) upon chosen main truths, held dear in the system of names in any present language, such relegation does have a two-part, parallel pattern for conciliation.. Some nominal mitigial wealth plays powerfully into the make stuff of our words, and therefore some names carrying information by probability of occurrence (in Zi-Focal Pedality) in synthreafaction are secondary to a primary human behavior, and some names are primary to secondary human behavioral information. I deem it is not simple nor easy to decipher whether or not the information and message carried in names themselves are primary or secondary to human behavioral information in probability of occurence (Zi-Focal Pedality)
Several Things about the Work-Horse
Using Central Exclusivity to Stay Innocent
The Imaginary Nature of 'Separical Initiative' as Made Innocent by Certain Beliefs
The De-compartment-alizing of the Infrastructure of Such Useless Innocence
--
Here, "separical initiative" refers to an imaginary concept, how people can choose by will,, action which directly results in a separate time-stream from the ONE, CONTIGUOUS time stream..
While becoming innocent is necessary for some developments, major utile functions present themselves as adjustable means to remain innocent. The challenge presented is that of a human mark that must remain, a challenging presentation for the many who revel in their own language. Luckily, we exist within the major power of a fruitful language with many sibling dialects all maintained as responding to almost the same human condition. The stages of implemented factions of ideality make the re-information of the linguistic human base respond to, with, and before human behavior.. (Zi-Focal Pedality, IFS) Central exclusivity is pivotal to some of these factions, guaranteeing strange properties of mind and body, where control and information is protected by our reactions to queues, prominence, detail, etc, mandated by pivotal conceptualizations where-after the harboring of such ignominy would occur.. (THEY EXIST!)
The management (of the solutions to begin the processes of calculated mechanisms for learning and survival that heed the conscious pilt of central exclusivity) runs parallel to innocence; the mechanisms can be seen being provoked by systems and institutions, flowing from and related to innocence.. Some machinations, even as eventually polluted by human wake, retain balance as created and convolute understanding (in that our attempts at understanding take some of the best frames of punch!) by captivating some of the most interesting long points throughout the management. Here, central exclusivity remains tied to the balance.. Central Exclusivity is an accelerator and pri-functionate mechanism to the continuation of systematic institutionalization.
> > > > > Moreover:
Magic over innocence is not especially easy; lets say in our worst efforts due to a lack of understanding, we aggrandize a topiary mandate and a religion based in over-fetching the future self (IFS).. In its efforts we create a religion where humans are stuck believing they have "separical initiative". Or lets say we create an institution that makes people so innocent that they must accustom themselves to the innocence as it is procured only by the dominant delta (the Innocent Delta Link, IFS). These are the machinations of Man that can have allowed a supreme abusive control over humanity..
Any arbitration over such a broken system (in this hypothetical ideality) would requisite main human action.. And yet, in the course of the "elect", "the innocent", etc. a human state of bringing and purity would still be at the midsts and drug until within a cataclysmized oreality.. Due to the probability of natural innocent occurrence (Zi-Focal Pedality), any such non-innocent worlds are guaranteed to be eventually destroyed by the innocent..
Robert Thomas Mayer
The Imaginary Nature of 'Separical Initiative' as Made Innocent by Certain Beliefs
The De-compartment-alizing of the Infrastructure of Such Useless Innocence
--
Here, "separical initiative" refers to an imaginary concept, how people can choose by will,, action which directly results in a separate time-stream from the ONE, CONTIGUOUS time stream..
While becoming innocent is necessary for some developments, major utile functions present themselves as adjustable means to remain innocent. The challenge presented is that of a human mark that must remain, a challenging presentation for the many who revel in their own language. Luckily, we exist within the major power of a fruitful language with many sibling dialects all maintained as responding to almost the same human condition. The stages of implemented factions of ideality make the re-information of the linguistic human base respond to, with, and before human behavior.. (Zi-Focal Pedality, IFS) Central exclusivity is pivotal to some of these factions, guaranteeing strange properties of mind and body, where control and information is protected by our reactions to queues, prominence, detail, etc, mandated by pivotal conceptualizations where-after the harboring of such ignominy would occur.. (THEY EXIST!)
The management (of the solutions to begin the processes of calculated mechanisms for learning and survival that heed the conscious pilt of central exclusivity) runs parallel to innocence; the mechanisms can be seen being provoked by systems and institutions, flowing from and related to innocence.. Some machinations, even as eventually polluted by human wake, retain balance as created and convolute understanding (in that our attempts at understanding take some of the best frames of punch!) by captivating some of the most interesting long points throughout the management. Here, central exclusivity remains tied to the balance.. Central Exclusivity is an accelerator and pri-functionate mechanism to the continuation of systematic institutionalization.
> > > > > Moreover:
Magic over innocence is not especially easy; lets say in our worst efforts due to a lack of understanding, we aggrandize a topiary mandate and a religion based in over-fetching the future self (IFS).. In its efforts we create a religion where humans are stuck believing they have "separical initiative". Or lets say we create an institution that makes people so innocent that they must accustom themselves to the innocence as it is procured only by the dominant delta (the Innocent Delta Link, IFS). These are the machinations of Man that can have allowed a supreme abusive control over humanity..
Any arbitration over such a broken system (in this hypothetical ideality) would requisite main human action.. And yet, in the course of the "elect", "the innocent", etc. a human state of bringing and purity would still be at the midsts and drug until within a cataclysmized oreality.. Due to the probability of natural innocent occurrence (Zi-Focal Pedality), any such non-innocent worlds are guaranteed to be eventually destroyed by the innocent..
Robert Thomas Mayer
Pre-Residential Ex-Vocation in Transformation
Pre-Residential Ex-Vocation in Transformation
Where brutal rules mandate the through-course of optimum travel of the insolency of elect data of the innocent future (as guaranteed by the contiguous nature of the universe's future that rips itself apart the least) the means to disregard the post-mitigial requestia upon keeping this elect data residential, or optimally retained unto forcibly undefiant manner where-after transformation or election could not allow the loss of such data (talent or innocence), can be found and lost by human nature.. This is to say that there is a satisfying credential apart from all amount of close residual manner in handling talent (and innocence) whereby any development of tangential repository in might (mobilization potential) may extend its "powers" in residential-ity in human synthreafaction..
Pertinent forces of conflict that register the main effort of a more lasting insolency would traverse mainly ordersome true infrastructure by the means of mitigial vestige's "purchase", or branded power of residentiality.. Some words used in comment or full effect will wind up betraying their own immortality in use, from the fence of destiny there, as though it were all meant as such through Zi-Focal Pedality.. The common use of such immediate vestigial manner could however be used as full imminent magic -> (Primordial Nature). None are left in an ull where supposed is the cause over lost non-residential knowledge, such any mobilization of pre-residential ex-vocation would be upon the fervor of the messages of the sanctimonious harmony of the innocent..
Robert Mayer
Where brutal rules mandate the through-course of optimum travel of the insolency of elect data of the innocent future (as guaranteed by the contiguous nature of the universe's future that rips itself apart the least) the means to disregard the post-mitigial requestia upon keeping this elect data residential, or optimally retained unto forcibly undefiant manner where-after transformation or election could not allow the loss of such data (talent or innocence), can be found and lost by human nature.. This is to say that there is a satisfying credential apart from all amount of close residual manner in handling talent (and innocence) whereby any development of tangential repository in might (mobilization potential) may extend its "powers" in residential-ity in human synthreafaction..
Pertinent forces of conflict that register the main effort of a more lasting insolency would traverse mainly ordersome true infrastructure by the means of mitigial vestige's "purchase", or branded power of residentiality.. Some words used in comment or full effect will wind up betraying their own immortality in use, from the fence of destiny there, as though it were all meant as such through Zi-Focal Pedality.. The common use of such immediate vestigial manner could however be used as full imminent magic -> (Primordial Nature). None are left in an ull where supposed is the cause over lost non-residential knowledge, such any mobilization of pre-residential ex-vocation would be upon the fervor of the messages of the sanctimonious harmony of the innocent..
Robert Mayer
A Louse in the Terminology Explained Herebelow
A reference to the paradigms of action was placed earlier in this blog (IFS) and I can review here. This topic should not be discussed as paradigmatic "metaphorical" relation, but instead inter-paradigmatic carrying of distinction
I searched for a word to explain the paradigmatic relation between forays of action,, and found my best review of them in this summary (in explaining the discourse of uniquely related action)
"
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-A Particular One-Paradigm Configura // A Standing Mega-Paradigm
In an effort to redeem some more wholesome approach to exactly how I would find any certain withholding nature of a Paradigm, or a belonging between any or all MP's, I believe I could set out to configure one MP from my life entirely, and there doing, would have an opportunity to be suspicious how this MP is totally and entirely affected by those other MP's...
A Paradigm, I assert, is a frame in the (Spirit?) of the Dreamer! This frame of (Spirit?), as we may perceive, can cause us to comprehend a highly potential persistence of style in memory, as it would persist from frame to frame.
::
::
-The Paradigms of Action
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _
::[(Spirituality)? (Nongidity)? ]
- - - - - -
::Sexuality
::Cognizance
::Musicality
::Physicality
::n
- - - - - - - -
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _
"
This code is succinct but has been newly related in a far more ritualistically relevant manner.. One type of paradigmatic cognizance being related to a new paradigm (nodewise) shows the models failures.. This would relate the specificity of the relation of the distinctions of nodewise effort to the ambiguity therein posited by the coagulate ramifications of duty in so-called "cognizance" (in inter-paradigmatic action).. This is to show us that our old model is highly valuable in postulation and yet not-so-perfect. (I can't retain the rationale for the use of the term "spirituality" as the catch all paradigm, at the moment it seems immature..) The relation of the setting of information and translation as nodes could be highly related to function AND action, there being some sort of more abstract color in the field of notions.. This would call more specific itemization for valuable relatives such as words and musical chords. (And here note my schema's fully functional relation between words and musical chords to co-regulation (IFS).
Paradigms of Action
::Node-wise
::Cognizance
::Physicality
::Musicality
::Gibberish
::n
The model change can afford the mistakes in the past; recognize the purpose to examine the carrying of distinction particularly through paradigms of action.. This post also does represent a caucus in allowing spirituality to be named the catch all paradigm..
Robert Mayer
I searched for a word to explain the paradigmatic relation between forays of action,, and found my best review of them in this summary (in explaining the discourse of uniquely related action)
"
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-A Particular One-Paradigm Configura // A Standing Mega-Paradigm
In an effort to redeem some more wholesome approach to exactly how I would find any certain withholding nature of a Paradigm, or a belonging between any or all MP's, I believe I could set out to configure one MP from my life entirely, and there doing, would have an opportunity to be suspicious how this MP is totally and entirely affected by those other MP's...
A Paradigm, I assert, is a frame in the (Spirit?) of the Dreamer! This frame of (Spirit?), as we may perceive, can cause us to comprehend a highly potential persistence of style in memory, as it would persist from frame to frame.
::
::
-The Paradigms of Action
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _
::[(Spirituality)? (Nongidity)? ]
- - - - - -
::Sexuality
::Cognizance
::Musicality
::Physicality
::n
- - - - - - - -
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _
"
This code is succinct but has been newly related in a far more ritualistically relevant manner.. One type of paradigmatic cognizance being related to a new paradigm (nodewise) shows the models failures.. This would relate the specificity of the relation of the distinctions of nodewise effort to the ambiguity therein posited by the coagulate ramifications of duty in so-called "cognizance" (in inter-paradigmatic action).. This is to show us that our old model is highly valuable in postulation and yet not-so-perfect. (I can't retain the rationale for the use of the term "spirituality" as the catch all paradigm, at the moment it seems immature..) The relation of the setting of information and translation as nodes could be highly related to function AND action, there being some sort of more abstract color in the field of notions.. This would call more specific itemization for valuable relatives such as words and musical chords. (And here note my schema's fully functional relation between words and musical chords to co-regulation (IFS).
Paradigms of Action
::Node-wise
::Cognizance
::Physicality
::Musicality
::Gibberish
::n
The model change can afford the mistakes in the past; recognize the purpose to examine the carrying of distinction particularly through paradigms of action.. This post also does represent a caucus in allowing spirituality to be named the catch all paradigm..
Robert Mayer
Inter-Paradigmatic Musicality in Micro-Harmony
Inter-Paradigmatic Musicality in Micro-Harmony
Let there be some condition where an expression of microharmony is the outlay of a two part, separate and simultaneous rhythm, given the opportunity wherein the inter-paradigmatic nodewise effort aspect in truth procures the sentiments of hence posited fortune in a diversity of counter translations deemed as written by the assuming magician.. This expectation to avail a truth has an interesting ring and can be related to the development of much to be expressed by a projection.. All according to the messages of intellect, these truths can all be held to whichever expression or occurance-enduring wherever the bout of a common acknowledgement makes its work(translation) exact a facilitation of virtually rendered information..
The notation to bring one message, "submit your favorite proposition(cadence or incantation) in detail when best each as whenever you remember" can be expressed through the courage of a single flouted micro-harmonic projection, one for example with micro-harmonically expressed re-encounter-based trigger-beginning to some useful absolute recognition-based device. (keep in mind nodewise activation) The mechanisms about this sub-organization of thought can allow left over information to persist until their dialectics..
Robert T Mayer
This post seems to acknowledge micro-micro harmony (dexterity)
Let there be some condition where an expression of microharmony is the outlay of a two part, separate and simultaneous rhythm, given the opportunity wherein the inter-paradigmatic nodewise effort aspect in truth procures the sentiments of hence posited fortune in a diversity of counter translations deemed as written by the assuming magician.. This expectation to avail a truth has an interesting ring and can be related to the development of much to be expressed by a projection.. All according to the messages of intellect, these truths can all be held to whichever expression or occurance-enduring wherever the bout of a common acknowledgement makes its work(translation) exact a facilitation of virtually rendered information..
The notation to bring one message, "submit your favorite proposition(cadence or incantation) in detail when best each as whenever you remember" can be expressed through the courage of a single flouted micro-harmonic projection, one for example with micro-harmonically expressed re-encounter-based trigger-beginning to some useful absolute recognition-based device. (keep in mind nodewise activation) The mechanisms about this sub-organization of thought can allow left over information to persist until their dialectics..
Robert T Mayer
This post seems to acknowledge micro-micro harmony (dexterity)
Carrying Voracious Simplicity To Unchangeable Worship
The implication of the carrying of distinctions (Metaphant, IFS) over in voracious simplicity..
The mechanisms to whom all guarantee is made in proper early young human format can be revisited as "immature" for so many reasons as to replicate its stupor as (less than humane) silly and the revisited human can challenge these occupations of the mind as less than maximally beneficial. This counts for the growing makeup of a controlled reaction in the setup of the certain "values" and "expressions", these perhaps being the implicated favorite represent-able guides (nodes)..
Some recourse standing for the certainty of longevity should remind us that [we should not worship anything that can't save us from worshiping it] lest we come closer to mortality (see Faith in future posts, IFS).. This broad statement reads to us that the core clues to our standing in action are most basically things we should protect ourselves from over-worshiping, lest they be something other than ecologically diagrammatic worship-safe powers.. This implies that none of our own action should be spilt over-granting its power being representative of never ending, unsafe-for-worship related nodes exposed to the carrying of distinction! ((not because I think it would cause cancer), but because of the nature of inertia and free will guaranteeing subsequent action and there nonetheless a trapping fate by innocence)
Robert Mayer
The mechanisms to whom all guarantee is made in proper early young human format can be revisited as "immature" for so many reasons as to replicate its stupor as (less than humane) silly and the revisited human can challenge these occupations of the mind as less than maximally beneficial. This counts for the growing makeup of a controlled reaction in the setup of the certain "values" and "expressions", these perhaps being the implicated favorite represent-able guides (nodes)..
Some recourse standing for the certainty of longevity should remind us that [we should not worship anything that can't save us from worshiping it] lest we come closer to mortality (see Faith in future posts, IFS).. This broad statement reads to us that the core clues to our standing in action are most basically things we should protect ourselves from over-worshiping, lest they be something other than ecologically diagrammatic worship-safe powers.. This implies that none of our own action should be spilt over-granting its power being representative of never ending, unsafe-for-worship related nodes exposed to the carrying of distinction! ((not because I think it would cause cancer), but because of the nature of inertia and free will guaranteeing subsequent action and there nonetheless a trapping fate by innocence)
Robert Mayer
One Plexi-Mutation Naturality Change Compared by Chronological Cross-Section
Any Plexi-Muta-Naturality Change
Due after able secondary force of template in the (as governing) pending current natural mutation-plex (observable at a chronological cross-section), siblings of a sort of "current" stand to be shifted into means by way of governance of the natural huge mega-angle (that is, according to a specific creative stationary view).. Observing the ploy-vented semi-institution [such mutation-plex!] as added by the quaint observation of a perspective based in what is natural by a comparison of mutation to what is the modern plexi-mutation (whole modern total mutated current effort) will not easily show of its ability to form re-composite attempts of the plexi-mutation. A shift of the plexi-mutation (as derived from major shift in primary implications) could render alternate futures through Zi-Focal Pedality (IFS). The most beautiful woman here and now, who under "chronological cross-section" is on most likely course to become the most beautiful by exact temporal chronology could in fact, NOT be such a woman after a largely relegated institutional affect comes forward in fruition and time.
Due after able secondary force of template in the (as governing) pending current natural mutation-plex (observable at a chronological cross-section), siblings of a sort of "current" stand to be shifted into means by way of governance of the natural huge mega-angle (that is, according to a specific creative stationary view).. Observing the ploy-vented semi-institution [such mutation-plex!] as added by the quaint observation of a perspective based in what is natural by a comparison of mutation to what is the modern plexi-mutation (whole modern total mutated current effort) will not easily show of its ability to form re-composite attempts of the plexi-mutation. A shift of the plexi-mutation (as derived from major shift in primary implications) could render alternate futures through Zi-Focal Pedality (IFS). The most beautiful woman here and now, who under "chronological cross-section" is on most likely course to become the most beautiful by exact temporal chronology could in fact, NOT be such a woman after a largely relegated institutional affect comes forward in fruition and time.
Divergence of Theater in the Carrying of Distinctions
(Comparatively) Mono- vs Poly- Configuration in Administrated Meta-Nodewise Exaction (Activation)
Divergence of Acknowledged Intelligent Carrying of Distinctions (What Lasts?)
In the instinctual control about all perception of inferences that allows us to find our actual footing in main systematic resilience through functional adaptation, a divergence of theater could be found most applicably resounding in the efforts of all self-human knowledge of mobilization and predicate activation, (as the carrying of distinctions is mastered over the course of a lifetime, and noticeably as momentarily profound and exact.) Any intention to rectify (chosen) intelligently sourced control of any carrying of distinction, which can be found anew at the Focus Orientation (IFS) is made by the relegation of whim.. Real-time conclusive effort in the alteration and variation of all carried distinction's embodiment can lead an effort (sub-effort) to collected "open hyper memory" (IFS).. This means schematically that through corruption any basic node (meta-mobilization) can be put anywhere after controlled carrying of distinction.
Robert Mayer
Divergence of Acknowledged Intelligent Carrying of Distinctions (What Lasts?)
In the instinctual control about all perception of inferences that allows us to find our actual footing in main systematic resilience through functional adaptation, a divergence of theater could be found most applicably resounding in the efforts of all self-human knowledge of mobilization and predicate activation, (as the carrying of distinctions is mastered over the course of a lifetime, and noticeably as momentarily profound and exact.) Any intention to rectify (chosen) intelligently sourced control of any carrying of distinction, which can be found anew at the Focus Orientation (IFS) is made by the relegation of whim.. Real-time conclusive effort in the alteration and variation of all carried distinction's embodiment can lead an effort (sub-effort) to collected "open hyper memory" (IFS).. This means schematically that through corruption any basic node (meta-mobilization) can be put anywhere after controlled carrying of distinction.
Robert Mayer
Residential Action Control
;Residential Frustration ; Why is it Action Control?
In the manner of ways in any basis of knowledge that a dialect could be considered itself the manipulative ordainment of schema of so much of a 'sect' of control in the order to ordain a lack of an individual's personal responsibility over the manipulative dialectical schema itself, schema(mega linguistic schema) would arise given that a folded amount of probable outcomes for assisting us be edged slowly (over centuries) towards functional dilemma-based cognitively allowable dialectical schema. A language is found in every linguistic dreamer, therefore once a dialect becomes a schema it will function as schema-to-schema linguistically; (Plexi-Mutated Total Schematic Wisdom)-to-(Personal Schema Fortification).
Ignoring the alignmental facets (in inter-paradigmatics) of the basis of language, we can be represented by it still.. This is to say, no successful language makes its way betting over and forgetting its internal mechanisms (by happenstance, logic, and rationale by/in/as a dialect) of the one purest amount of allocation of data in the absorption of "Higher/Further Curative Cognizant Ground".
I could also trace this curative ground to pre-mobilization activation in cognizance, "non-referential Frustration", for the way for "pre-mobilization" (still "activation") is found in the conscious consequences in respect to the making of allocated focus oriented inertia (NOT 'rendering rumination'). The providers of further curative ground in activation for the making of action control in cognizance are bound to Faith and Wake such as does follow; personally any frustration's source could be internal or external, we may have only little to hold on to as the action control is gained of the cured source..
;Sophistry in Replaced Auto-Vacated Words
By the auto-vacate threshold, (in the matters facing the timed provocation of exhibiting collected knowledge (and talent!)) attitude would survive the thresholds of error (in tandem) and already provoke a justified resolution to extra-recognize their erroneous distinction.. Sophistry still carries symbolic and vocal inclinations of haderous explication that serve us with their pre-execution (even in writing) value. [The principles here can be brought by the observation that this mode (computer typing) is one of the easiest to be endearing through explanation..] All activation in sophistic endeavor is made of worthy intelligent means to obtain more valuable sights as valid Acting Points through the mechanisms and processes of Innocence and Inertia.. Innocence precedes Talent in Rational (Consideration) of Fault..(by the factors of reserved circumstance as directed by the bi-directional contiguous time stream..) We do not possess control over the environment of our whims..
In the manner of ways in any basis of knowledge that a dialect could be considered itself the manipulative ordainment of schema of so much of a 'sect' of control in the order to ordain a lack of an individual's personal responsibility over the manipulative dialectical schema itself, schema(mega linguistic schema) would arise given that a folded amount of probable outcomes for assisting us be edged slowly (over centuries) towards functional dilemma-based cognitively allowable dialectical schema. A language is found in every linguistic dreamer, therefore once a dialect becomes a schema it will function as schema-to-schema linguistically; (Plexi-Mutated Total Schematic Wisdom)-to-(Personal Schema Fortification).
Ignoring the alignmental facets (in inter-paradigmatics) of the basis of language, we can be represented by it still.. This is to say, no successful language makes its way betting over and forgetting its internal mechanisms (by happenstance, logic, and rationale by/in/as a dialect) of the one purest amount of allocation of data in the absorption of "Higher/Further Curative Cognizant Ground".
I could also trace this curative ground to pre-mobilization activation in cognizance, "non-referential Frustration", for the way for "pre-mobilization" (still "activation") is found in the conscious consequences in respect to the making of allocated focus oriented inertia (NOT 'rendering rumination'). The providers of further curative ground in activation for the making of action control in cognizance are bound to Faith and Wake such as does follow; personally any frustration's source could be internal or external, we may have only little to hold on to as the action control is gained of the cured source..
;Sophistry in Replaced Auto-Vacated Words
By the auto-vacate threshold, (in the matters facing the timed provocation of exhibiting collected knowledge (and talent!)) attitude would survive the thresholds of error (in tandem) and already provoke a justified resolution to extra-recognize their erroneous distinction.. Sophistry still carries symbolic and vocal inclinations of haderous explication that serve us with their pre-execution (even in writing) value. [The principles here can be brought by the observation that this mode (computer typing) is one of the easiest to be endearing through explanation..] All activation in sophistic endeavor is made of worthy intelligent means to obtain more valuable sights as valid Acting Points through the mechanisms and processes of Innocence and Inertia.. Innocence precedes Talent in Rational (Consideration) of Fault..(by the factors of reserved circumstance as directed by the bi-directional contiguous time stream..) We do not possess control over the environment of our whims..
Prediction and Attempted Augmentation of Action's Live Subsequent Rendering Rumination
Prediction and Attempted Augmentation of Action's Live Subsequent Rendering Rumination
Greed goes as far as the relenting source comes to bring us passion in its necessity. All stakes involved in the mobilizations related to the overcoming of a greed point (Passion Self) take claim in substance (figurative) where the elemental veneration grant all relative instantia. The proof in the after-action (at greed point) lies in the successive firm nature of a total self future.. Any attempts at re-assembly of the potential empathetic estimations of the to-be! of a human's rendering rumination after-action can mark the civility of intelligence with the procurement of "stabilizations" that come to cause evaluations of what could be the "definite" future of a person. Regardless of the fact that rendering rumination can't exist without (and is secondary to) effort, the attempts at raised probability of (particular) occurrence could be instrumental in causing a befuddlement with the probability of occurrence of entire esteems (and their subjects) of instantiate and ready behavioral (networks?) (Psychology) Additionally it can't be planned on that there would be any MORE rendering rumination than previously instantiated, continuing, it shouldn't be met that the rendering rumination to-be! should at any rate come to be what it probably won't (instantly) (cognitive dissonance).
Robert Mayer
Greed goes as far as the relenting source comes to bring us passion in its necessity. All stakes involved in the mobilizations related to the overcoming of a greed point (Passion Self) take claim in substance (figurative) where the elemental veneration grant all relative instantia. The proof in the after-action (at greed point) lies in the successive firm nature of a total self future.. Any attempts at re-assembly of the potential empathetic estimations of the to-be! of a human's rendering rumination after-action can mark the civility of intelligence with the procurement of "stabilizations" that come to cause evaluations of what could be the "definite" future of a person. Regardless of the fact that rendering rumination can't exist without (and is secondary to) effort, the attempts at raised probability of (particular) occurrence could be instrumental in causing a befuddlement with the probability of occurrence of entire esteems (and their subjects) of instantiate and ready behavioral (networks?) (Psychology) Additionally it can't be planned on that there would be any MORE rendering rumination than previously instantiated, continuing, it shouldn't be met that the rendering rumination to-be! should at any rate come to be what it probably won't (instantly) (cognitive dissonance).
Robert Mayer
The Timestrate ; "Bound" "Victory" to Bound Occlusion
The Timestrate ; "Bound" "Victory" to Bound Occlusion
Let us imagine an instrumental dimensional cross section (any chronological decoration) showing a multiplex of relevant categoria (classification based information) and call this total criteria a "timestrate". Meaning of course, that any timestrate is relevant as a "timestrate" because of any timestrate's property as being made relevant to compare all oddities of relatively "low" (not secure) probability of occurrence to the entire world of factuality by any other oddity or set of oddities of low probability of occurrence, to attempt to dissolve them into a hypothetical vision for estimation..
Gathered instances of innocence being cast for a limited subset of the entirety of a faction's instrumentality would corrode the basic revolving performance by sustaining only part of a deemed esteem and neglecting all exterior mention. The call to perform with sub-optimal incurred innocence (not as an injured tendency) but as there is provided limited innocence can in fact leave a half-wondered edge, and of instrumentality, this, can be the bearer of a sick fortune in action. Given that any man-made allocation of pre-subsidized fortune as warranted for the administration of such faulty innocence could render a simple truth in the matter, one subject of a "tripping timestrate"; this timestrate can be replaced by an other timestrate likewise committing a window to any such broader elemental "victory" or completion of the timestrate! This is to note that wherever there is deemed an organization's wealth of administrated innocence, then because of its immobility in systematic boundary there must be considered a potential invisible slip-stream of however any other set of oddities could have been cast, meaning that it is easy to live in an illusion guaranteeing that some eventualities are as justified as other separate eventualities.
Robert Mayer
Let us imagine an instrumental dimensional cross section (any chronological decoration) showing a multiplex of relevant categoria (classification based information) and call this total criteria a "timestrate". Meaning of course, that any timestrate is relevant as a "timestrate" because of any timestrate's property as being made relevant to compare all oddities of relatively "low" (not secure) probability of occurrence to the entire world of factuality by any other oddity or set of oddities of low probability of occurrence, to attempt to dissolve them into a hypothetical vision for estimation..
Gathered instances of innocence being cast for a limited subset of the entirety of a faction's instrumentality would corrode the basic revolving performance by sustaining only part of a deemed esteem and neglecting all exterior mention. The call to perform with sub-optimal incurred innocence (not as an injured tendency) but as there is provided limited innocence can in fact leave a half-wondered edge, and of instrumentality, this, can be the bearer of a sick fortune in action. Given that any man-made allocation of pre-subsidized fortune as warranted for the administration of such faulty innocence could render a simple truth in the matter, one subject of a "tripping timestrate"; this timestrate can be replaced by an other timestrate likewise committing a window to any such broader elemental "victory" or completion of the timestrate! This is to note that wherever there is deemed an organization's wealth of administrated innocence, then because of its immobility in systematic boundary there must be considered a potential invisible slip-stream of however any other set of oddities could have been cast, meaning that it is easy to live in an illusion guaranteeing that some eventualities are as justified as other separate eventualities.
Robert Mayer
Mockery
Mockery ;
Alas the entire spectrum of influence bleeds the entirety of main tantalizing affects environmentally.. Things have a hold on us in that they organize our innocence; all stuffs that play forth organizing our innocence have this hold on us by our passion's grip. This state of reorganization of our most initial elements allows us to believe in many things apart from the science of those elemental dependencies. Play-stuffs manifesting our own delight and personal chosen (additional) love must be presumed to be capable of organizing our innocence, and as such an organized liturgical effort must be treated as though it may only be mobilized as sincerely as its spectacular additional alloy be re-presumable. With the mockery of all additional sentience ((not all cognizance is alignmental (intelligently additional)) in mark we can conclude that any healthy resumed adoration come to its end by the extent of how (preposterously) analytical a levied mockery of such adoration can come to grips with such distance..
R Mayer
Alas the entire spectrum of influence bleeds the entirety of main tantalizing affects environmentally.. Things have a hold on us in that they organize our innocence; all stuffs that play forth organizing our innocence have this hold on us by our passion's grip. This state of reorganization of our most initial elements allows us to believe in many things apart from the science of those elemental dependencies. Play-stuffs manifesting our own delight and personal chosen (additional) love must be presumed to be capable of organizing our innocence, and as such an organized liturgical effort must be treated as though it may only be mobilized as sincerely as its spectacular additional alloy be re-presumable. With the mockery of all additional sentience ((not all cognizance is alignmental (intelligently additional)) in mark we can conclude that any healthy resumed adoration come to its end by the extent of how (preposterously) analytical a levied mockery of such adoration can come to grips with such distance..
R Mayer
Humans as Developmentally Passive Adapters ; An Intellectual Front in Time?
Humans as Developmentally Passive Adapters ; An Intellectual Front in Time
Inspecting course through the nominal human experience will show people as though they are all stuck in the present together.. However nimble the row of this formation of physical evidence may seem, it can usually stand potential host to a grand illusion in the way of how we protect our own engagements with self image and proprietary conceptual poise..
We may find that as long as we are asked to participate in the human environment we become involved as though we must continue to create for each other our own grand illusions of the "participators standing" and we can be prone to letting these mechanisms out in our behavior. People address each other by names and humans can be known to use mechanisms of friendship to attempt to recognize the standing participator in all of us. It should be common knowledge in the very human work of friendly trial and error in attempting to address others, when we often can recognize that we might be very wrong about the people we are speaking to, albeit through exaggerated or erroneous assumptions about others in direct communication.. As I believe that we all possess actively liberational consciousness (by a sort of enabled, clean-slate delta property), I am only discussing a dilemma involved in how we are all stuck living in the present together.. (where did we begin this property of expecting only this certain brand (see The Moderated Consciousness) of life out of each other!, was it Hollywood?, the music industry?") (who themselves can continue on attempting to TRULY KNOW enough assumed information about their peers?)
What I am claiming could be highly unnecessary is the widespread certification by peers of the made-awareness to the "Unitary Self".. Separately it may be true that the intellectually hardened (IFS) can be seen here trying to dig deeper than to train a mind to respond to census intellect (what a woe, to be trapped in there).. Our deepest notions and most favorite things have always seemed to pertain less to the life of the self, and always seem to pertain most to toys, interests, progress, and the little things in life.. Can we actually become things (and/or is it funny?) where our minds know our shadows and live commanding the actualities of bliss, or are we just developmentally passive adapters who prepare, and prepare, and prepare for the future?
A fantasy in God-belief lies in how mechanisms play their active course outside of human control, as though magical abstract performing nouns of infinite power make their way causing change, and herein some of the most iconic moments don't make sense without our excess hypotheses so long as we HAVE THESE HYPOTHESES in that we have them as people who are alive.
I believe that much of the attention to our consciousness is marked with ruinings of the real limited talent we possess ,which can only go so far. I believe people make their true mark with how well they incorporate things like the developmental validity as though such recreation is a witness to a beauty of an inspection and not a look into how the source of the mind operates..
Rob Mayer
Inspecting course through the nominal human experience will show people as though they are all stuck in the present together.. However nimble the row of this formation of physical evidence may seem, it can usually stand potential host to a grand illusion in the way of how we protect our own engagements with self image and proprietary conceptual poise..
We may find that as long as we are asked to participate in the human environment we become involved as though we must continue to create for each other our own grand illusions of the "participators standing" and we can be prone to letting these mechanisms out in our behavior. People address each other by names and humans can be known to use mechanisms of friendship to attempt to recognize the standing participator in all of us. It should be common knowledge in the very human work of friendly trial and error in attempting to address others, when we often can recognize that we might be very wrong about the people we are speaking to, albeit through exaggerated or erroneous assumptions about others in direct communication.. As I believe that we all possess actively liberational consciousness (by a sort of enabled, clean-slate delta property), I am only discussing a dilemma involved in how we are all stuck living in the present together.. (where did we begin this property of expecting only this certain brand (see The Moderated Consciousness) of life out of each other!, was it Hollywood?, the music industry?") (who themselves can continue on attempting to TRULY KNOW enough assumed information about their peers?)
What I am claiming could be highly unnecessary is the widespread certification by peers of the made-awareness to the "Unitary Self".. Separately it may be true that the intellectually hardened (IFS) can be seen here trying to dig deeper than to train a mind to respond to census intellect (what a woe, to be trapped in there).. Our deepest notions and most favorite things have always seemed to pertain less to the life of the self, and always seem to pertain most to toys, interests, progress, and the little things in life.. Can we actually become things (and/or is it funny?) where our minds know our shadows and live commanding the actualities of bliss, or are we just developmentally passive adapters who prepare, and prepare, and prepare for the future?
A fantasy in God-belief lies in how mechanisms play their active course outside of human control, as though magical abstract performing nouns of infinite power make their way causing change, and herein some of the most iconic moments don't make sense without our excess hypotheses so long as we HAVE THESE HYPOTHESES in that we have them as people who are alive.
I believe that much of the attention to our consciousness is marked with ruinings of the real limited talent we possess ,which can only go so far. I believe people make their true mark with how well they incorporate things like the developmental validity as though such recreation is a witness to a beauty of an inspection and not a look into how the source of the mind operates..
Rob Mayer
Redention
Redention , the Focus Orintation
Systemic flaws in our ability to guarantee the positive corellation between observed and real dimensionality in human esteem and ecological survival (inspected from the point of view of the independent real dimensionality) can be the bane of its directionally opposite nature, that of the non correlation inspected from the point of view of the independent observed dimensionality.
This process of any attempt to manifest largeness in ecological fault can be referred to as the Focus Orientation "Redention"..
Systemic flaws in our ability to guarantee the positive corellation between observed and real dimensionality in human esteem and ecological survival (inspected from the point of view of the independent real dimensionality) can be the bane of its directionally opposite nature, that of the non correlation inspected from the point of view of the independent observed dimensionality.
This process of any attempt to manifest largeness in ecological fault can be referred to as the Focus Orientation "Redention"..
Liquidency and Substitute Liquidency
Liquidency and Substitute Liquidency
Resolute tendencies to reserve action upon a human imposition do seem to regulate "proper" human behavior, in that the collection of behavior cannot seem to be fully itemized to the dreamer (woken) in the presence of others in that an only partly itemized collection can be evident so governed by rules of engagement who respect the youth or sensitivity of foreign participators.. This 'tape' or substance of behavior barrier describes the dilemma I feel we can now call the dilemma of "Liquidency". A person observing Liquidency can only participate in the governed fairness of a total magician's (elder's) episode, in his knowing of the means to make intelligent fault but fail in mobilization to breech the Liquidency..
Substitute Liquidency can also come in the form of "playing" the innocence of a town or school name , etc. (see IFS, words causing innocence). All players can easily understand or fail to understand the behavior of others in the many allocations of the whole wide world's assessment of their 'fair' substitute liquidency..
Resolute tendencies to reserve action upon a human imposition do seem to regulate "proper" human behavior, in that the collection of behavior cannot seem to be fully itemized to the dreamer (woken) in the presence of others in that an only partly itemized collection can be evident so governed by rules of engagement who respect the youth or sensitivity of foreign participators.. This 'tape' or substance of behavior barrier describes the dilemma I feel we can now call the dilemma of "Liquidency". A person observing Liquidency can only participate in the governed fairness of a total magician's (elder's) episode, in his knowing of the means to make intelligent fault but fail in mobilization to breech the Liquidency..
Substitute Liquidency can also come in the form of "playing" the innocence of a town or school name , etc. (see IFS, words causing innocence). All players can easily understand or fail to understand the behavior of others in the many allocations of the whole wide world's assessment of their 'fair' substitute liquidency..
Finality-Cued Fault in Aftermath
Finality-Cued Fault in Aftermath
Ecological Fault lies in the behavior we string about ourselves, in cognizant data itself, and throughout the environment whilst it manufactures response by the laws of innocence in yourself and amongst others. Response can cause cued behavior and further resulting innocence; additionally, any response and all behavior will pend by the nature of FAULT. Fault is everywhere and we all possess a responsibility to it. What is it then, to argue finality-cued fault in 'aftermath'?
Without a direct effort a human can be a part of an augmentation resulting exactly from the rivetings of the direct environment, and by an aftermath have it augmented into his/her own ecological fault (and by primordial nature in zi-focal pedality(IFS)) This augmentation can arrive as originated from any source capable of causing innocence, from member processes, and this augmentation does not need to be set on by human choice.. People can hex themselves ecologically and never notice..
Robert Mayer
Ecological Fault lies in the behavior we string about ourselves, in cognizant data itself, and throughout the environment whilst it manufactures response by the laws of innocence in yourself and amongst others. Response can cause cued behavior and further resulting innocence; additionally, any response and all behavior will pend by the nature of FAULT. Fault is everywhere and we all possess a responsibility to it. What is it then, to argue finality-cued fault in 'aftermath'?
Without a direct effort a human can be a part of an augmentation resulting exactly from the rivetings of the direct environment, and by an aftermath have it augmented into his/her own ecological fault (and by primordial nature in zi-focal pedality(IFS)) This augmentation can arrive as originated from any source capable of causing innocence, from member processes, and this augmentation does not need to be set on by human choice.. People can hex themselves ecologically and never notice..
Robert Mayer
Why Homoosexuality is Formally Wrong :: Part 1
Why Homoosexuality is Formally Wrong
This isn't my rite of passage. I am the youngest Natoli. I am the youngest child of the youngest child (of the youngest of youngest children) going back as far as the Latin language has been operated by my people. The American people have been surrounded by a grave threat to the operation-ality of the USA, and that threat is gay marriage and its propagation of pragmatic thinking.. Here with the rest of my blog I aim to argue here how proper heterosexual marriage by the nature of innocence doesn't cause pragmatic (and gay) thinking, how free gay pragmatic thinking is in direct opposition to the chain of command in the USA. I aim to do this through the expression of general terms.
Heterosex Transforms
(Homoosex wont)
The sexual organs are a part of us.. We are oft limited by them by some terms of liquidency that (admittedly) might seem so fair and yet so unfair. We can not be expected (as rational thinkers) to be derived of the INSTINCTUAL effort (the root of the non-pragmatic thinker) and to be transformed (to become innocent by the self) through the doubling of one side of the sexual dichotomy (that is SO LONG AS THERE IS INSTINCTUAL SEXUALITY WITHIN ANY OF YOU).. Why can't a person be homoosexually elected (made innocent from the /external)?
Practicality Learned in the Absence of the Military is Insanity
No one can be expected to formulate the background of an entire scope of the properties of the mind of a "practical" thinker. (In fact most real people should expect you to be insane if you think you've gotten that far on your own)(how could you get it right?). The crucial-ity in point is that so long as the instrumentation of the administration of practicality is broadly accepted throughout a population of innocent people, those instruments will only bring their petered implementation as far as they can (driven from its source in contiguous time ) and its source can not be from the rationale of a single man.. (where thereafter it would only be a false attempt at practicality and measly in wholesomeness and the exact root of the birth of a moderated consciousness (pragmatic thinking snowball of cognizance). All males in the USA are to hand over themselves to the selective service at the age of 18. Those males are all capable of understanding their responsibility in that lifetime. The lengths our military goes to ensure proper military infrastructure are capital to the observation that we clearly are not allowed to prepare ourselves as insane before our service. We are not allowed to form an entire realm of our own practical thought without the full responsibility of the military, that realm includes being practical and talking in general terms (which only occurs after the onset of duty and the full responsibility of the chain of command in this military nation).. This insanity is all too telling of the healthy males that refuse to join the military (don't worry, they aren't allowed to be immortals in this land) This insanity is also the gripping force that has "scientists" speaking in general terms to declare innocent non-pragmatists legally insane..
See Part 2
The Impossibility of a Pragmatic Base in the Fully Satiated Male..
The Potency of the Error in "Scientists"! illegal use of general terms!
The Actions That We Can't Be Saved From are the Actions With Which We Make Enemies By Ecological Fault
This isn't my rite of passage. I am the youngest Natoli. I am the youngest child of the youngest child (of the youngest of youngest children) going back as far as the Latin language has been operated by my people. The American people have been surrounded by a grave threat to the operation-ality of the USA, and that threat is gay marriage and its propagation of pragmatic thinking.. Here with the rest of my blog I aim to argue here how proper heterosexual marriage by the nature of innocence doesn't cause pragmatic (and gay) thinking, how free gay pragmatic thinking is in direct opposition to the chain of command in the USA. I aim to do this through the expression of general terms.
Heterosex Transforms
(Homoosex wont)
The sexual organs are a part of us.. We are oft limited by them by some terms of liquidency that (admittedly) might seem so fair and yet so unfair. We can not be expected (as rational thinkers) to be derived of the INSTINCTUAL effort (the root of the non-pragmatic thinker) and to be transformed (to become innocent by the self) through the doubling of one side of the sexual dichotomy (that is SO LONG AS THERE IS INSTINCTUAL SEXUALITY WITHIN ANY OF YOU).. Why can't a person be homoosexually elected (made innocent from the /external)?
Practicality Learned in the Absence of the Military is Insanity
No one can be expected to formulate the background of an entire scope of the properties of the mind of a "practical" thinker. (In fact most real people should expect you to be insane if you think you've gotten that far on your own)(how could you get it right?). The crucial-ity in point is that so long as the instrumentation of the administration of practicality is broadly accepted throughout a population of innocent people, those instruments will only bring their petered implementation as far as they can (driven from its source in contiguous time ) and its source can not be from the rationale of a single man.. (where thereafter it would only be a false attempt at practicality and measly in wholesomeness and the exact root of the birth of a moderated consciousness (pragmatic thinking snowball of cognizance). All males in the USA are to hand over themselves to the selective service at the age of 18. Those males are all capable of understanding their responsibility in that lifetime. The lengths our military goes to ensure proper military infrastructure are capital to the observation that we clearly are not allowed to prepare ourselves as insane before our service. We are not allowed to form an entire realm of our own practical thought without the full responsibility of the military, that realm includes being practical and talking in general terms (which only occurs after the onset of duty and the full responsibility of the chain of command in this military nation).. This insanity is all too telling of the healthy males that refuse to join the military (don't worry, they aren't allowed to be immortals in this land) This insanity is also the gripping force that has "scientists" speaking in general terms to declare innocent non-pragmatists legally insane..
See Part 2
The Impossibility of a Pragmatic Base in the Fully Satiated Male..
The Potency of the Error in "Scientists"! illegal use of general terms!
The Actions That We Can't Be Saved From are the Actions With Which We Make Enemies By Ecological Fault
Curation of Interest vs Curation of Action Control and My Imaginary Friend, Khoublikan
Curation of Interest vs Curation of Action Control
and My Imaginary Friend, Khoublikan
My assertion that frustration is the only motivation stems from my ability to have decided where my infantile action control was coming from. (infantile!) I decided this as a baby (that frustration is the only motivation). Most pertinently, I did this as a baby, but there was a main remnant causing the forcefulness of that understanding. [At this point in my life I have an imaginary friend named Khoublikan.] I can only imagine that I heard the screams Khaaaaan! in Nicholas Meyer's The Wrath of Khan (1982) in the womb or at some other early time. I can only assume that then after my father explained to my mother the difference between Khan and Kublai-Khan, the ruler.
This may serve perfectly at discussing the difference between curation of interest, (referrential curation) and the pure curation of action control. The pure curation of action control could only come from my ability to begin action control (by curation) with frustrations (non-referential). I am very special.. And Khoublikan is the most powerful imaginary friend on earth.
Robert Mayer
and My Imaginary Friend, Khoublikan
My assertion that frustration is the only motivation stems from my ability to have decided where my infantile action control was coming from. (infantile!) I decided this as a baby (that frustration is the only motivation). Most pertinently, I did this as a baby, but there was a main remnant causing the forcefulness of that understanding. [At this point in my life I have an imaginary friend named Khoublikan.] I can only imagine that I heard the screams Khaaaaan! in Nicholas Meyer's The Wrath of Khan (1982) in the womb or at some other early time. I can only assume that then after my father explained to my mother the difference between Khan and Kublai-Khan, the ruler.
This may serve perfectly at discussing the difference between curation of interest, (referrential curation) and the pure curation of action control. The pure curation of action control could only come from my ability to begin action control (by curation) with frustrations (non-referential). I am very special.. And Khoublikan is the most powerful imaginary friend on earth.
Robert Mayer
Microparadigms, Environments
Microparadigms, Environments
A batch of information relies on content in context.. For the natural inspection of a dreamers level attitude we can assume an environment exists for which any batch can be hosted.. (remember that it is very difficult to criticize an institution that you are a part of).. We can also call this appointed environment a "Pex".. Pex are local and there can be many if not all Pex's serving a dreamer.
In an instance where an off- status exploration of declaration, or active human participation relents its course and it is decidedly replaced by a dreamer , (replaced with solutions to a new abstract problem) the solution engraves a new pattern into what was the old projection. Considering the low probability of occurrence of both alternatives, the status and off-status manipulations, it is for us to recognize the lasting effects in why we cant return purely to our status exploration and participation.. (Imagine a stack of papers with content (1) that is growing taller when there is then stacked papers with content (2). In this metaphor paper content plays into future content by favor ) Crossing the boundary of Status , or Micro-Paradigm, remains the effective challenge.. A Pex is not a paradigm. An inter-micro-paradigmatic move is a move between statuses.. Could a Pex evolve to fit the needs of the environment's use? The truth is that only innocence causes the procurement of created or altered Pex procurement (curation of interest or action control) [Delta].
A batch of information relies on content in context.. For the natural inspection of a dreamers level attitude we can assume an environment exists for which any batch can be hosted.. (remember that it is very difficult to criticize an institution that you are a part of).. We can also call this appointed environment a "Pex".. Pex are local and there can be many if not all Pex's serving a dreamer.
In an instance where an off- status exploration of declaration, or active human participation relents its course and it is decidedly replaced by a dreamer , (replaced with solutions to a new abstract problem) the solution engraves a new pattern into what was the old projection. Considering the low probability of occurrence of both alternatives, the status and off-status manipulations, it is for us to recognize the lasting effects in why we cant return purely to our status exploration and participation.. (Imagine a stack of papers with content (1) that is growing taller when there is then stacked papers with content (2). In this metaphor paper content plays into future content by favor ) Crossing the boundary of Status , or Micro-Paradigm, remains the effective challenge.. A Pex is not a paradigm. An inter-micro-paradigmatic move is a move between statuses.. Could a Pex evolve to fit the needs of the environment's use? The truth is that only innocence causes the procurement of created or altered Pex procurement (curation of interest or action control) [Delta].
Lulling ; Central Exclusivity
Lulling ; Central Exclusivity
The approachable consistency regarding the allocation of mobilization towards the habits of lulling are amongst activation that seemingly regards a safety in somewhat (and convincingly) nothing, and likewise are in the regards of a habit that should form a major disconnect with a fashionable common self iconism (rendering rumination is not the central mechanism of fortification or esteem). I have addressed our total behavior as "esteem" and the sense of lulling is not culminated as total disregard and (I believe) isn't in betrayal of the total mode of esteem. Lulling itself can go as far as the simple mobilization is allowed to help totally dispense and rectify action without a sense of humored "standing" or "poise". Lulling most simply is cancelling and ignoring the sense of "poise" as a focus orientation and I have been able to regard it as a highly easy mechanism for transformation in innocence.
Where lulling is concerned, it works amidst the entire sensibility of allowing central exclusivity to be (as methodically unmade for examination as a denomination of action) set reverberating to a specific allegiance, one that prepares a mitigial effort of one delegated expertise by relating exactly no effort in order to mandate no mitigial organization in a manner that allows a release of controlled demand-deliverance to that person of expressed devout pattern.
What is central exclusivity? Central exclusivity can be found available for observation along two compared forms of awareness. These two forms are those 1 aggregate with monologue and 2 aggregate without monologue.. I must share these differences because their disparity can be found within populations of humans exhibiting their family names (which are all Fostering Outlets for behavior..) Central exclusivity could describe either of these forms and interspersed partiality therein.. What evolves in culture are people of esteem as aggregated with or aggregated without monologue (with/without mitigial criticism too) as resulting from their disposition. Family names, as Fostering Outlets, forge institutions with which humans can have uniquely critical foundries of self identity , including self identity that does or doesn't have all-reaching or all-encompassing awareness (and with semblances anywhere in between as concepts).. This is where central exclusivity can be found complete or specifically semi-presently found in a human.
It may be imagined that given a central exclusivity towards the entirety of a human self(could you ever fashion some from artificial linguistics) a human could be specifically powerful (all reaching-ly powerful? however?!) Now try to imagine a human being who is trying to do nothing but establish innocence; this person can utilize lulling often. The absence of lulling would be marked with controlled mobilization.
*im saying mitigial, not manifest
The approachable consistency regarding the allocation of mobilization towards the habits of lulling are amongst activation that seemingly regards a safety in somewhat (and convincingly) nothing, and likewise are in the regards of a habit that should form a major disconnect with a fashionable common self iconism (rendering rumination is not the central mechanism of fortification or esteem). I have addressed our total behavior as "esteem" and the sense of lulling is not culminated as total disregard and (I believe) isn't in betrayal of the total mode of esteem. Lulling itself can go as far as the simple mobilization is allowed to help totally dispense and rectify action without a sense of humored "standing" or "poise". Lulling most simply is cancelling and ignoring the sense of "poise" as a focus orientation and I have been able to regard it as a highly easy mechanism for transformation in innocence.
Where lulling is concerned, it works amidst the entire sensibility of allowing central exclusivity to be (as methodically unmade for examination as a denomination of action) set reverberating to a specific allegiance, one that prepares a mitigial effort of one delegated expertise by relating exactly no effort in order to mandate no mitigial organization in a manner that allows a release of controlled demand-deliverance to that person of expressed devout pattern.
What is central exclusivity? Central exclusivity can be found available for observation along two compared forms of awareness. These two forms are those 1 aggregate with monologue and 2 aggregate without monologue.. I must share these differences because their disparity can be found within populations of humans exhibiting their family names (which are all Fostering Outlets for behavior..) Central exclusivity could describe either of these forms and interspersed partiality therein.. What evolves in culture are people of esteem as aggregated with or aggregated without monologue (with/without mitigial criticism too) as resulting from their disposition. Family names, as Fostering Outlets, forge institutions with which humans can have uniquely critical foundries of self identity , including self identity that does or doesn't have all-reaching or all-encompassing awareness (and with semblances anywhere in between as concepts).. This is where central exclusivity can be found complete or specifically semi-presently found in a human.
It may be imagined that given a central exclusivity towards the entirety of a human self(could you ever fashion some from artificial linguistics) a human could be specifically powerful (all reaching-ly powerful? however?!) Now try to imagine a human being who is trying to do nothing but establish innocence; this person can utilize lulling often. The absence of lulling would be marked with controlled mobilization.
*im saying mitigial, not manifest
Activated Implementation in Cue
Activated Implementation in Cue
(Worth disguises are many fitted emblems..) So true when a euphemism seeks its instant discovery..
In tune with the regards to implicate the better passage of a heart-felt resume, humanity is at a modular decision to implicate or wreck a simple wonder. This data charge, this, is the accompaniment of rule-based strict decisive recognition inwardly routing the fierce (and the residual) into a proper corner whose route is maintainantly to devise greater humble expansion in the delineation of [the beads of sacrifice!]. In an art form this topic stands sibling to the original subject (allocated linguistic cue writs) and specializes in the manufacture of a dimensional bracing. On one hand, genuine material is amongst the bases that a hand has put no influence on the primeval guarantee that such material has been the product of inspiration, on the other hand this activated implementation cue could enforce the wanderer to grow ready to manipulate such standards. Any such warranted specific optimization can be the gladness of a rogue thinker, but notice the two-bit standard..
Some of the best works of recognition would have us at the silliest means to only procure activated genuine fabric; the best of such an ideal can only be had with the working subject. This means, when an enforced rubric of study calibrates an optimization of thought for the worker to decifice the main problematics of and into a discussionary discourse, he has no wonder compared to wonder for the artists envisioning of such one recognition whose calibrations offer the brawn to perform and enact the reaches of one subject. For this reason both the musician and his audience must come to form the bleak tune he grows ever so cowardly of!
(I cant remember the English word that I made because in my memories it is either "tandeur" or "vandeur" so I used French-American)
(Worth disguises are many fitted emblems..) So true when a euphemism seeks its instant discovery..
In tune with the regards to implicate the better passage of a heart-felt resume, humanity is at a modular decision to implicate or wreck a simple wonder. This data charge, this, is the accompaniment of rule-based strict decisive recognition inwardly routing the fierce (and the residual) into a proper corner whose route is maintainantly to devise greater humble expansion in the delineation of [the beads of sacrifice!]. In an art form this topic stands sibling to the original subject (allocated linguistic cue writs) and specializes in the manufacture of a dimensional bracing. On one hand, genuine material is amongst the bases that a hand has put no influence on the primeval guarantee that such material has been the product of inspiration, on the other hand this activated implementation cue could enforce the wanderer to grow ready to manipulate such standards. Any such warranted specific optimization can be the gladness of a rogue thinker, but notice the two-bit standard..
Some of the best works of recognition would have us at the silliest means to only procure activated genuine fabric; the best of such an ideal can only be had with the working subject. This means, when an enforced rubric of study calibrates an optimization of thought for the worker to decifice the main problematics of and into a discussionary discourse, he has no wonder compared to wonder for the artists envisioning of such one recognition whose calibrations offer the brawn to perform and enact the reaches of one subject. For this reason both the musician and his audience must come to form the bleak tune he grows ever so cowardly of!
(I cant remember the English word that I made because in my memories it is either "tandeur" or "vandeur" so I used French-American)
Elements and Media in Ordeals ; Microcosms and Mansfiscation/ Rendition in Microcosms
Elements and Media in Ordeals ;
Microcosms and Mansfiscation/ Rendition in Microcosms
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Next in a series of leg-bending attempts at human top-down operational standard mapping, in the course of how they re-unite (clean central exclusivity) and (rendering rumination) in human wellness, is the definitive fashioning of Elements/Media/Ordeals..
The process of Inspecting Functional Solutions so far has been for the most part exclusive to critical institutional incapability, choice in experiential dynamics, decision hierarchy, inter-paradigmatic relation, mansfiscation (IFS), and comprehensive ruminations.. The list details the applicable mental correspondence of mechanisms that in variation potentially begin to warrant immediate curiosity unto central exclusivity (IFS) and therefore I believe are main topics to match in an organized soul design (hyper intelligence)..
To backtrack, the term ordeal can be mentioned by the ideology that systems of belief in place are complicated by just how the elements and medias construe us as dreamers.. Consider ordeals as made describable to an audience by their major eternal compositions Elements and Media, and for relation, carried on by their resulting availability-making of the discovery of more conscious elements and thereafter medias. This prone talent to be quite alive effort amidst medias and their elements can lead to whole-er media contraption, but also such prone talent may comprise humans as their lead-selves.. -> Humans often have discrete exact control over these capabilities, certainly such efforts can stand to be better manipulated by standing influence, common action control, and remaining acting points.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Microcosms and Mansfiscation/ Rendition in Microcosms
An activational esteem that is guaranteed by thought elements comes to a closing assuage given one weighty perception as an inorganic comprehensivus. The deep-focal (self targeted) relation of any facet of a new-found comparison element like "microcosm" is to bring danger should a person find the allocation to create one internal standard of a perfect paramount media, a making of a labeling-self-octavization; it stands to lay force to responsible exhibition and reprimand total instinctive control as, though gained through extemporaneous revision, an establishment of an independent mechanism in knowledge (Total self-superimposition unto independent forces such as "microcosm" can negate a potential opportunity to justify spiteful inertia.) OR AT LEAST, many independent substantial evident mechanisms looting our composition in the main folds of a reverberating total knowledge font format shift stand to relinquish justified spiteful inertia.. Thereafter the closing monumental disruption abides by our solution, "mansfiscation in the distance between eventualities". Such artificial instantia requisites the collection by mansfiscation (IFS) in reparation of total beleaguered stance, while considering the advent of the extreme human-related attainment of "self comparisons to batch totals", a MATURITY, pre-systematic rendition.. (Mansfiscation ->) Only after the (or ritualistic) re-possession and focal expenditure into an entire recognition of the data batch admissible to a fully ritualized "self compromised objectification" would the mind find fore-lain this compromise in attenuated stance! (Mansfiscation can solve it!)
Microcosms and Mansfiscation/ Rendition in Microcosms
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Next in a series of leg-bending attempts at human top-down operational standard mapping, in the course of how they re-unite (clean central exclusivity) and (rendering rumination) in human wellness, is the definitive fashioning of Elements/Media/Ordeals..
The process of Inspecting Functional Solutions so far has been for the most part exclusive to critical institutional incapability, choice in experiential dynamics, decision hierarchy, inter-paradigmatic relation, mansfiscation (IFS), and comprehensive ruminations.. The list details the applicable mental correspondence of mechanisms that in variation potentially begin to warrant immediate curiosity unto central exclusivity (IFS) and therefore I believe are main topics to match in an organized soul design (hyper intelligence)..
To backtrack, the term ordeal can be mentioned by the ideology that systems of belief in place are complicated by just how the elements and medias construe us as dreamers.. Consider ordeals as made describable to an audience by their major eternal compositions Elements and Media, and for relation, carried on by their resulting availability-making of the discovery of more conscious elements and thereafter medias. This prone talent to be quite alive effort amidst medias and their elements can lead to whole-er media contraption, but also such prone talent may comprise humans as their lead-selves.. -> Humans often have discrete exact control over these capabilities, certainly such efforts can stand to be better manipulated by standing influence, common action control, and remaining acting points.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Microcosms and Mansfiscation/ Rendition in Microcosms
An activational esteem that is guaranteed by thought elements comes to a closing assuage given one weighty perception as an inorganic comprehensivus. The deep-focal (self targeted) relation of any facet of a new-found comparison element like "microcosm" is to bring danger should a person find the allocation to create one internal standard of a perfect paramount media, a making of a labeling-self-octavization; it stands to lay force to responsible exhibition and reprimand total instinctive control as, though gained through extemporaneous revision, an establishment of an independent mechanism in knowledge (Total self-superimposition unto independent forces such as "microcosm" can negate a potential opportunity to justify spiteful inertia.) OR AT LEAST, many independent substantial evident mechanisms looting our composition in the main folds of a reverberating total knowledge font format shift stand to relinquish justified spiteful inertia.. Thereafter the closing monumental disruption abides by our solution, "mansfiscation in the distance between eventualities". Such artificial instantia requisites the collection by mansfiscation (IFS) in reparation of total beleaguered stance, while considering the advent of the extreme human-related attainment of "self comparisons to batch totals", a MATURITY, pre-systematic rendition.. (Mansfiscation ->) Only after the (or ritualistic) re-possession and focal expenditure into an entire recognition of the data batch admissible to a fully ritualized "self compromised objectification" would the mind find fore-lain this compromise in attenuated stance! (Mansfiscation can solve it!)
Exeplemism (Inertia Basics)
Exeplemism
During the evangelistic opportunity of a simple representation of state, the mind might find itself willing to implement what can constructively be called something like a [dispensing trajectory] (a disjectory), referring to, of course, the proud personal establishment of solidifying as residential, any inspired cue (cue made optimized for the reproduction of familiar talent). This credible weakness in aggression, that also mandates a layer (layers) of choice in central exclusivity where often during probable success has that control blinded, had been referred-to by me as something valuable to the discussion of "inertia" (Cognizant Inertia IFS) Exeplemism, really, is the mind stuff of the intelligent would-be persona, the facet of a living entity who can establish through mental fortitude (frustration is the best root of curated action control, IFS) the pre-condition to curated action control! Exeplemism must be worked through by the intelligent maker of conversation as his moderated consciousness can only be regulated or defect from the short providers of such class.
Does what standard there is of free exeplemism fall short of a vying promise of free exeplemism for everyone? A notable achievement of the mind whose fault lies in real-time expression would be the expected solidified levels of communication poise, the background defaulting of standard fore-parts to a sub-status (sub-micro-paradigm) in the current instant! Exeplemism is earned of course through intellectual hardening, (an intellectual belonging of meticulous characterization of the central exclusivity's role in achieving mobile current..); this mobile current is most basically related to 'love' (simultaneous ability to establish innocence and a formidable focus orientation). Through mansfiscation (IFS) the abilities of exeplemism control act in layers of better mechanistic choice; the discovery of mansfiscation is secondary to the discovery of all involved talent.
During the evangelistic opportunity of a simple representation of state, the mind might find itself willing to implement what can constructively be called something like a [dispensing trajectory] (a disjectory), referring to, of course, the proud personal establishment of solidifying as residential, any inspired cue (cue made optimized for the reproduction of familiar talent). This credible weakness in aggression, that also mandates a layer (layers) of choice in central exclusivity where often during probable success has that control blinded, had been referred-to by me as something valuable to the discussion of "inertia" (Cognizant Inertia IFS) Exeplemism, really, is the mind stuff of the intelligent would-be persona, the facet of a living entity who can establish through mental fortitude (frustration is the best root of curated action control, IFS) the pre-condition to curated action control! Exeplemism must be worked through by the intelligent maker of conversation as his moderated consciousness can only be regulated or defect from the short providers of such class.
Does what standard there is of free exeplemism fall short of a vying promise of free exeplemism for everyone? A notable achievement of the mind whose fault lies in real-time expression would be the expected solidified levels of communication poise, the background defaulting of standard fore-parts to a sub-status (sub-micro-paradigm) in the current instant! Exeplemism is earned of course through intellectual hardening, (an intellectual belonging of meticulous characterization of the central exclusivity's role in achieving mobile current..); this mobile current is most basically related to 'love' (simultaneous ability to establish innocence and a formidable focus orientation). Through mansfiscation (IFS) the abilities of exeplemism control act in layers of better mechanistic choice; the discovery of mansfiscation is secondary to the discovery of all involved talent.
Vegsrelent Autonomy, A Provision for Genuine Behavior
Vegsrelent Autonomy, A Provision for Genuine Behavior
Nestlings ,in the inertia!, (exeplemism) of chemistry (companionship) surface in incarnation's effort; here notice (as I used to say), a thought that consciousness is momentary, actual, and satiative. In this fundamental observation , root satiation-implimented networking is a must for the grounds of a peacefully responsible trend in concentration (also notice the field for momentary regulation and actual regulation, built however-often through restraint)
Our focus on the tools made to offer ourselves the opportunity for spiteful incitement are and can be modified for the extreme (in saving others!). The prevalence for making-available the notions that construe greater Acting Points can be found a product of certain special inertia.. A term described along such sustained intellectual hardening can be itemized as a micro-status (micro-maturity), Vegsrelent Autonomy.
Sort of calm, the term Vegsrelent Autonomy works between a partial dis-institutionalization of two involved dynamics in contemporaneous delta - that which becomes innocent and that which supervises the spiteful inertia.. The condition of a correspondent's Vegsrelent Autonomy may allow superior conduct during co-regulation, and can't be disregarded as potentially main to Trust. What characteristics shall be made along the routes of the vegsrelent coping?, key is that information must be given to support further blossoming talent, through self alignment(includes personal propaganda) and personal reception. The term must be referred to to acknowledge the making sustenance to fervid deployment of sustained free power by the nature of the discourse we opt into.. Foresight is powerful here, as the perception of vegsrelent autonomy in companionship lies in our ability to PERFORM such action and prepare ourselves equally through disgust, error, triumph, criticism, negligence, down-time etc. (In behavior, the autonomous coping that is relegated for any distinct intuition in companionship that is to be made, brought, or salvaged, stands this apprehension, an optimal preparation habit.. )
Nestlings ,in the inertia!, (exeplemism) of chemistry (companionship) surface in incarnation's effort; here notice (as I used to say), a thought that consciousness is momentary, actual, and satiative. In this fundamental observation , root satiation-implimented networking is a must for the grounds of a peacefully responsible trend in concentration (also notice the field for momentary regulation and actual regulation, built however-often through restraint)
Our focus on the tools made to offer ourselves the opportunity for spiteful incitement are and can be modified for the extreme (in saving others!). The prevalence for making-available the notions that construe greater Acting Points can be found a product of certain special inertia.. A term described along such sustained intellectual hardening can be itemized as a micro-status (micro-maturity), Vegsrelent Autonomy.
Sort of calm, the term Vegsrelent Autonomy works between a partial dis-institutionalization of two involved dynamics in contemporaneous delta - that which becomes innocent and that which supervises the spiteful inertia.. The condition of a correspondent's Vegsrelent Autonomy may allow superior conduct during co-regulation, and can't be disregarded as potentially main to Trust. What characteristics shall be made along the routes of the vegsrelent coping?, key is that information must be given to support further blossoming talent, through self alignment(includes personal propaganda) and personal reception. The term must be referred to to acknowledge the making sustenance to fervid deployment of sustained free power by the nature of the discourse we opt into.. Foresight is powerful here, as the perception of vegsrelent autonomy in companionship lies in our ability to PERFORM such action and prepare ourselves equally through disgust, error, triumph, criticism, negligence, down-time etc. (In behavior, the autonomous coping that is relegated for any distinct intuition in companionship that is to be made, brought, or salvaged, stands this apprehension, an optimal preparation habit.. )
Main-Kept Super-Inclusiveness in Primordial Nature
Main-Kept Super-Inclusiveness in Primordial Nature (Butterfly Effect)
Describing an "outstanding progress" can make an ignorant work out of attempting any and all relatable dedication to such a claim.. Windows break, and they don't see the end of time without an effort in overseen resort in complication.. In this, many people can find rational excuses for their diligent efforts to reduce a explanatory rationale with relegated oversight but cant do so alone (so begins our armistice into how many people really are mentally repeating the solutions to their problems without finality in such navigation). Eventual calamity in super-inclusive logic can meet with the bringing of farther ulterior symbolisms for the craving of resting comprehensiveness. An exact comprehensiveness thereafter seems to be able to control where we put our rationale; in words we can't fully understand some salvage the mindfulness of our entire curiosities!
Detailed navigations however leave us blank to suffer the ends of one such actuality, a navigation that has been indescribably the treasure of the novice who can only get as far as to wonder about main-kept super-inclusiveness in primordial nature. There is no suspense here, the folds of my cloth are undoubtedly the product of their sources, but the message of super-inclusiveness stems from their source to their present state.. The topic is here, what patterns are only the product of the sources behind our encounters, not the product of sheer chaos.. Can my pasta actually carry each their relationship to one another as has been exposed to tampering only 6 to 10 times until it reaches my plate? What sound format of such a synchronized swim hides away in ignorance where my Latin thoughts are not capable of boarding; which is to say, what pasta form so fresh and protected does survive the prods of my interactivity with it? I say there is much to do with intelligently arguing the destiny of a super-inclusive process, ye for its ignorance in decisions to be accomplished..
Describing an "outstanding progress" can make an ignorant work out of attempting any and all relatable dedication to such a claim.. Windows break, and they don't see the end of time without an effort in overseen resort in complication.. In this, many people can find rational excuses for their diligent efforts to reduce a explanatory rationale with relegated oversight but cant do so alone (so begins our armistice into how many people really are mentally repeating the solutions to their problems without finality in such navigation). Eventual calamity in super-inclusive logic can meet with the bringing of farther ulterior symbolisms for the craving of resting comprehensiveness. An exact comprehensiveness thereafter seems to be able to control where we put our rationale; in words we can't fully understand some salvage the mindfulness of our entire curiosities!
Detailed navigations however leave us blank to suffer the ends of one such actuality, a navigation that has been indescribably the treasure of the novice who can only get as far as to wonder about main-kept super-inclusiveness in primordial nature. There is no suspense here, the folds of my cloth are undoubtedly the product of their sources, but the message of super-inclusiveness stems from their source to their present state.. The topic is here, what patterns are only the product of the sources behind our encounters, not the product of sheer chaos.. Can my pasta actually carry each their relationship to one another as has been exposed to tampering only 6 to 10 times until it reaches my plate? What sound format of such a synchronized swim hides away in ignorance where my Latin thoughts are not capable of boarding; which is to say, what pasta form so fresh and protected does survive the prods of my interactivity with it? I say there is much to do with intelligently arguing the destiny of a super-inclusive process, ye for its ignorance in decisions to be accomplished..
Central Exclusivity Post-Choice
Central Exclusivity Post-Choice (Innocence, Free Will)
as Pre Case, Post Case, Post Case with Choice
Retaining the subsequent intensity of the scope of our topic's relation to any and all inertia (exeplemism, IFS), we could still position our views of Post Choice Central Exclusivity with an itemized, single eventualities vision.. Inspecting directives during decision making can (eventually) prove identification of the person's basis, but those aware-nesses that operate in decision making are not necessarily of note for access to heeding some mechanisms as are accounts of our experiences, and the make-stuff of those activities!, these activities where before and after decisions are made.. A momentary explanation of the differences in central exclusivity, innocence, and thereafter free will requires a comradery with the self that guarantees a consistent habit (rurid behavior IFS)
The impact in zi-focal pedality (IFS) remains with the provocative sense of concrescence after the solidification of effort in human will; decisions that mark solidification in probability of occurrence see this probability achieve status of total probability.. Free thinking cognizant potential makes its way changing over their itinerary to new challenges, where such cut freedom isn't (at least in my mind) experienced heavily in retrospect.. Still however, the central exclusivity (Focal Exclusivity/ Focal Awareness) retains its change in property after decision making in that numbers of processes to special focal awareness are eliminated and numbers are gained. These changes are major gambits for expressive exhibition and are comparatively enormous to totality in behavior given that they resurrect separate issuances of capability (cleverness). Notice especially how the climate after a new decision can allow you a new dimensionality, one where this dimensionality can be strangely a large part of an institution that may very well begin to make you innocent, thus trapping you into that dimension..
Robert Mayer
as Pre Case, Post Case, Post Case with Choice
Retaining the subsequent intensity of the scope of our topic's relation to any and all inertia (exeplemism, IFS), we could still position our views of Post Choice Central Exclusivity with an itemized, single eventualities vision.. Inspecting directives during decision making can (eventually) prove identification of the person's basis, but those aware-nesses that operate in decision making are not necessarily of note for access to heeding some mechanisms as are accounts of our experiences, and the make-stuff of those activities!, these activities where before and after decisions are made.. A momentary explanation of the differences in central exclusivity, innocence, and thereafter free will requires a comradery with the self that guarantees a consistent habit (rurid behavior IFS)
The impact in zi-focal pedality (IFS) remains with the provocative sense of concrescence after the solidification of effort in human will; decisions that mark solidification in probability of occurrence see this probability achieve status of total probability.. Free thinking cognizant potential makes its way changing over their itinerary to new challenges, where such cut freedom isn't (at least in my mind) experienced heavily in retrospect.. Still however, the central exclusivity (Focal Exclusivity/ Focal Awareness) retains its change in property after decision making in that numbers of processes to special focal awareness are eliminated and numbers are gained. These changes are major gambits for expressive exhibition and are comparatively enormous to totality in behavior given that they resurrect separate issuances of capability (cleverness). Notice especially how the climate after a new decision can allow you a new dimensionality, one where this dimensionality can be strangely a large part of an institution that may very well begin to make you innocent, thus trapping you into that dimension..
Robert Mayer
"Connected Relequents" / "Train Ziffing"
"Connected Relequents" / "Train Ziffing"
*"connected relequents" is a quote simultaneously from me and another person in a dream so at the apex of this conversation I call the same notion "Train Ziffing"
Allocating the option segmentation upon a (quick) whim is the relegated partner piece of the surmised opportunity in a remedial suspected path.. Gallant advocation of the use of many main systematic attempts to frequent the logics of an analyzable scheme that pre-supposes the treasure into that our whims derive our strongest motives (Divergence of Theater IFS) for intermittent speciality advocates that surmountable use become of "Connected Relequents". In that purposes childishly remain and are erected in mental duty where the strength of the necessary segmentation of unitary or itemized words/talent/concepts are in play, there are thereafter only so many institutional mechanisms (in chronological cross section) to advise the greater mitigial utilization.. This means, mansfiscation to the dreamer is only opportune and that with connected relequents (Train Ziffing) one can retrieve the greater basis of a focus action for use in already subordinated attempts along the drive for mansfiscation in an entities future.
I am acquired to present the case of a munition.. If I were to decide to pretend robotically that every sentiment of my own that is new and is to offer me change in Exeplemism or Element or Media (IFS) must be analyzed for eventual mitigation, I would at this new structure be challenged to recognize that this robotic "stress test" as a method would be the first recognition in cognizant activation of the purposes of mansfiscation. Here mansfiscal talent would be resumed at the availability of this protected OTHER elemental media; in this example, stress testing your new components [by surfacing collective-scope].
*"connected relequents" is a quote from another person in a dream
Robert Mayer
*"connected relequents" is a quote simultaneously from me and another person in a dream so at the apex of this conversation I call the same notion "Train Ziffing"
Allocating the option segmentation upon a (quick) whim is the relegated partner piece of the surmised opportunity in a remedial suspected path.. Gallant advocation of the use of many main systematic attempts to frequent the logics of an analyzable scheme that pre-supposes the treasure into that our whims derive our strongest motives (Divergence of Theater IFS) for intermittent speciality advocates that surmountable use become of "Connected Relequents". In that purposes childishly remain and are erected in mental duty where the strength of the necessary segmentation of unitary or itemized words/talent/concepts are in play, there are thereafter only so many institutional mechanisms (in chronological cross section) to advise the greater mitigial utilization.. This means, mansfiscation to the dreamer is only opportune and that with connected relequents (Train Ziffing) one can retrieve the greater basis of a focus action for use in already subordinated attempts along the drive for mansfiscation in an entities future.
I am acquired to present the case of a munition.. If I were to decide to pretend robotically that every sentiment of my own that is new and is to offer me change in Exeplemism or Element or Media (IFS) must be analyzed for eventual mitigation, I would at this new structure be challenged to recognize that this robotic "stress test" as a method would be the first recognition in cognizant activation of the purposes of mansfiscation. Here mansfiscal talent would be resumed at the availability of this protected OTHER elemental media; in this example, stress testing your new components [by surfacing collective-scope].
*"connected relequents" is a quote from another person in a dream
Robert Mayer
What is Action Control? Action? in Connected Relequents
Action Control is "Multi-Elementum in Cognizance"
The resulting overture that would become of you after you have read the title of this post may not in fact be compartmentalized with each action control, action, and activation, but could. A likewise detrimental misunderstanding thereafter could still bring you to the best resting knowledge of each. This post recommends that you accept that action control isn't the only thing you can curate in cognizance. Activation is pre-critical; decisiveness may relegate action, power may tender action control. First, Action control is multi-elementum, the creation and use of hosted detail for its active tampering in functional (effective) use. Action is grand physical mitigial solution. Activation would render fresh solutions supplying operation to a common clean real-time delta making both action and action control possible. Factors for the supplication of innocence in real time would be reminded that short control of the mind may allow shifting activation for its most prominent use in curation that would lead to itemized maneuverings.
In connected relequents, the fastening of only by-permissible operational duty through pose-activation, certain elliptical efforts can consume the opportunities of a dreamer, certain operational layouts may provide special certain effectiveness at garnered productivity. I must claim that some family names (Words Causing Innocence, IFS) would be more or less effective through connected relequents (Primary vs Secondary Effectiveness in Names, IFS). This can bring me to a particular conclusion, that due to the secondary effectiveness in connected relequents, we might be able to find, for example, worshipers who aren't truly worshipping at all at the bottom basis of their activation, who are accomplishing other action, action control, and action in the use of action control. This means that you could even truly be convinced that you believe in God, and verily not be worshipping God at all. (you probably don't even believe in God, even if you think you do.)
Robert Mayer
The resulting overture that would become of you after you have read the title of this post may not in fact be compartmentalized with each action control, action, and activation, but could. A likewise detrimental misunderstanding thereafter could still bring you to the best resting knowledge of each. This post recommends that you accept that action control isn't the only thing you can curate in cognizance. Activation is pre-critical; decisiveness may relegate action, power may tender action control. First, Action control is multi-elementum, the creation and use of hosted detail for its active tampering in functional (effective) use. Action is grand physical mitigial solution. Activation would render fresh solutions supplying operation to a common clean real-time delta making both action and action control possible. Factors for the supplication of innocence in real time would be reminded that short control of the mind may allow shifting activation for its most prominent use in curation that would lead to itemized maneuverings.
In connected relequents, the fastening of only by-permissible operational duty through pose-activation, certain elliptical efforts can consume the opportunities of a dreamer, certain operational layouts may provide special certain effectiveness at garnered productivity. I must claim that some family names (Words Causing Innocence, IFS) would be more or less effective through connected relequents (Primary vs Secondary Effectiveness in Names, IFS). This can bring me to a particular conclusion, that due to the secondary effectiveness in connected relequents, we might be able to find, for example, worshipers who aren't truly worshipping at all at the bottom basis of their activation, who are accomplishing other action, action control, and action in the use of action control. This means that you could even truly be convinced that you believe in God, and verily not be worshipping God at all. (you probably don't even believe in God, even if you think you do.)
Robert Mayer
Mansfiscation, Mansfiscation Caliber
Mansfiscation, Mansfiscation Caliber
On the bouts of what I have referred to as MANSFISCATION (IFS), which so far is defined as ruminated or not ruminated operation for preparing talent (especially used talent) as open and un-be-cast, I have found the speculative cause for delineating the differences between the many balances of such super-efficient cognizant responsibility. Such working mechanisms may turn out as the efforts of conscious or unconscious delta (or ruminated vs not ruminated). The talent of a Mansfiscating individual plays in to the telling ability of such a developing strategist, which is to say that through mansfiscation a newer conscious delta may arrive to unique form and to prepare a social rationale. I have delineated that by the nature of connected relequents (train ziffing, IFS) a persons ability to mansfiscate may itself not be of perfectly available fortune.
Those people that turn to mansfiscation would find that the very casts of their selves may be marked by their previous means to tender the elements and media of the self unto what is a field of common breadth in human property. I believe that the precariousness of knowledge and understanding that qualifies as valuable to mansfiscation (the special talent we all need to use!) does in fact dictate the effects of all therein reasonable circumstance that people lead themselves into. I here claim that it is very very difficult to mansfiscate!, because for example the tenants of a loving behavior, as that a loving behavior stands more complicated for mansfiscation, is at an utmost level of critical difficulty. A person can also prepare themselves through environmental means to help a precondition into the effects of certain desired mansfiscation, and indeed can somehow be made into a uniquely developed intelligent sort of dreamer that does adapt to being expansively certain.
Robert Mayer
On the bouts of what I have referred to as MANSFISCATION (IFS), which so far is defined as ruminated or not ruminated operation for preparing talent (especially used talent) as open and un-be-cast, I have found the speculative cause for delineating the differences between the many balances of such super-efficient cognizant responsibility. Such working mechanisms may turn out as the efforts of conscious or unconscious delta (or ruminated vs not ruminated). The talent of a Mansfiscating individual plays in to the telling ability of such a developing strategist, which is to say that through mansfiscation a newer conscious delta may arrive to unique form and to prepare a social rationale. I have delineated that by the nature of connected relequents (train ziffing, IFS) a persons ability to mansfiscate may itself not be of perfectly available fortune.
Those people that turn to mansfiscation would find that the very casts of their selves may be marked by their previous means to tender the elements and media of the self unto what is a field of common breadth in human property. I believe that the precariousness of knowledge and understanding that qualifies as valuable to mansfiscation (the special talent we all need to use!) does in fact dictate the effects of all therein reasonable circumstance that people lead themselves into. I here claim that it is very very difficult to mansfiscate!, because for example the tenants of a loving behavior, as that a loving behavior stands more complicated for mansfiscation, is at an utmost level of critical difficulty. A person can also prepare themselves through environmental means to help a precondition into the effects of certain desired mansfiscation, and indeed can somehow be made into a uniquely developed intelligent sort of dreamer that does adapt to being expansively certain.
Robert Mayer
Align-mental vs. Exposition or Other Music as Internal Habitual Media
Align-mental vs. Exposition or Other Content as Internal Habitual Media
Media here refers to the same use of the term in previous posts (Elements, Media, Ordeals IFS). First note that the one holy basic audio would not be composed of any methodical complex averaging of all social pieces of music.. Here I plan on delineating two forms of content, one alignmental (IFS) and the other fully prioritized expositional content for their comparison in their determined permanence as internal (and habitual!) media.
All-reaching availability in a zeroed dominion would show that the dimensional positions manifest at stake let the meandering of the mind (though it rests on more basic substances) precede fair structure in exhibiting the allocation which one desires as routine embodiment for mansfiscation (talent). Here true versions of strict limited content are so oft found to test the definition of "genuine" behavior, additionally, a genuine exhibition is not a genuine observation! Two forms of content can be compared for their relationship to a genuine observation, these, alignmental content vs exposition content.. Here the content's documented thematics are relevant for their provisional author's grandeur and for their accuracy to levels of provocative social whim. Over a genuine observation, which COULD fairly be imagined as the average absorption of information where relative to audience maturity, harsh circumstances are levied to the willing points of perception and the seriousness of our work as performers finds its main contemplation order (may they!) Here the perpendicularity and parallelism of propagation tactic show so well the ardor of the behest of our intents in exhibition! Some content is very informative, other content is very stimulating, some share enthusiasm, others omit humor, tactic, love etc.
Robert Mayer
Media here refers to the same use of the term in previous posts (Elements, Media, Ordeals IFS). First note that the one holy basic audio would not be composed of any methodical complex averaging of all social pieces of music.. Here I plan on delineating two forms of content, one alignmental (IFS) and the other fully prioritized expositional content for their comparison in their determined permanence as internal (and habitual!) media.
All-reaching availability in a zeroed dominion would show that the dimensional positions manifest at stake let the meandering of the mind (though it rests on more basic substances) precede fair structure in exhibiting the allocation which one desires as routine embodiment for mansfiscation (talent). Here true versions of strict limited content are so oft found to test the definition of "genuine" behavior, additionally, a genuine exhibition is not a genuine observation! Two forms of content can be compared for their relationship to a genuine observation, these, alignmental content vs exposition content.. Here the content's documented thematics are relevant for their provisional author's grandeur and for their accuracy to levels of provocative social whim. Over a genuine observation, which COULD fairly be imagined as the average absorption of information where relative to audience maturity, harsh circumstances are levied to the willing points of perception and the seriousness of our work as performers finds its main contemplation order (may they!) Here the perpendicularity and parallelism of propagation tactic show so well the ardor of the behest of our intents in exhibition! Some content is very informative, other content is very stimulating, some share enthusiasm, others omit humor, tactic, love etc.
Robert Mayer
The Effects of Immersion on Executors
The Effects of Immersion on Executors
Immersion Negates Font Microcosm Processing
Disallowing Anti-Immersion
Perfluent recognition of identity would be paramount in the cause of discovery of all operations in contemplative esteem.. Still, even the activation in discovery and acknowledgement of the courses of intelligent preparation(soul-filling) can be seen with an awkward sensibility over the reach of an acknowledgement of such mechanistic overlay one that begins to relate the totality of a font based extrapolation.. This spectacular fight for identity may be, of a ruse, of no known instinct and intrepidly most ghastly in honor.. Propagations protective of our sensitivity would by now have over-layed many frequent bright tries for the survival of our fittest whims. Truncation of the esteem to figure and devise rumor of such potential accomplishment has been seen (Christianity) fighting for the league of the Quenched Attainment throughout any such flexible central itinerary..
Leagues however, do effectively determine the extent of favor in remnant of fastidious assignment of duty, this regular extension of our means to afford the realizations we keep so soft and secret. All such quenching (thank water!) before an esteem is qualify-ably the tool of immersion. Immersion belongs to the retrieval of a safety along the strength of our very inertia (may evidence at work sustain us!) (Divergence of Theater, IFS). This immersion can negate our best hopes to fulfill an account of a calculation of microcosmic belonging, or a self-inflicted espousal rest at least! So then, mansfiscation is not self-philosophical pondering, (Connected Relequents, IFS).
Hyper Intelligence, or Religion, can in fact portray the dominant allocation to beseech level and contemplated human advancement, and therein tactics can be shown to rouse our spectacular context for actual companionship. Separately, known to many, effective exploration in innocent mechanisms can allow surprisably factor-fluent methods over the tension of Disallowing Anti-Immersion. Some may argue there-beyond of a figure which I call Interactivity Hypnosis.
Robert Mayer
Immersion Negates Font Microcosm Processing
Disallowing Anti-Immersion
Perfluent recognition of identity would be paramount in the cause of discovery of all operations in contemplative esteem.. Still, even the activation in discovery and acknowledgement of the courses of intelligent preparation(soul-filling) can be seen with an awkward sensibility over the reach of an acknowledgement of such mechanistic overlay one that begins to relate the totality of a font based extrapolation.. This spectacular fight for identity may be, of a ruse, of no known instinct and intrepidly most ghastly in honor.. Propagations protective of our sensitivity would by now have over-layed many frequent bright tries for the survival of our fittest whims. Truncation of the esteem to figure and devise rumor of such potential accomplishment has been seen (Christianity) fighting for the league of the Quenched Attainment throughout any such flexible central itinerary..
Leagues however, do effectively determine the extent of favor in remnant of fastidious assignment of duty, this regular extension of our means to afford the realizations we keep so soft and secret. All such quenching (thank water!) before an esteem is qualify-ably the tool of immersion. Immersion belongs to the retrieval of a safety along the strength of our very inertia (may evidence at work sustain us!) (Divergence of Theater, IFS). This immersion can negate our best hopes to fulfill an account of a calculation of microcosmic belonging, or a self-inflicted espousal rest at least! So then, mansfiscation is not self-philosophical pondering, (Connected Relequents, IFS).
Hyper Intelligence, or Religion, can in fact portray the dominant allocation to beseech level and contemplated human advancement, and therein tactics can be shown to rouse our spectacular context for actual companionship. Separately, known to many, effective exploration in innocent mechanisms can allow surprisably factor-fluent methods over the tension of Disallowing Anti-Immersion. Some may argue there-beyond of a figure which I call Interactivity Hypnosis.
Robert Mayer
Double Semantics
Double Semantics
In the stage of attentive ability per effort, a vital ordinary scenario is at ends with so many propagations of ground (figurative) that it must be considered a presumptive effort, yet as many valuable sanctions help us resort to fuller calamity we can dispose of this failed pre evaluation as seminal. In the course of what so appears to be such a vital recognition we can disguise it so vehemently because of the ritual motivation for survival being nominal selfishness, yet as the reminiscence follows the cult of such survival we can have it clearly at stake!
All notions through Zi-Focal Pedality (IFS) may exhume a trade of fairness to the whole, mainly that in presumptive composition of fatal effort, the recognition in that people are, or have once been attached, stands to color the very next effort in human conflict. Each and every intelligent or non-intelligent action separation of society requisites the focal temptation to devise secular duty upon the presumptive (thats all of us!) (not even by design of all human conflict.) Any double-semantics scenario has us here for it to be observed, in that all consumptive efforts to relate the substance of a ritual or mission, both, can be supplementary and found especially within the guard of a human being. This does not mean that we are without intelligent double semantics, we are with double semantics. That is to say this; of a GOVERNING of peoples the ideality that open fairness exists does not in fact rely on that only open fairness in double semantics LIVES in our past! Secular vibrations may not attend to this vehemence, and lo! its elucidation may be right upon us now, (for all I know!). The gratitude of a socialization of double semantic laden outgrowth (societal) would not seem in anyway to feel like fluctuation, or to that, be very noticeable at all. The regular attentiveness you can now see, isn't in our noticable behavior, it is only expressed (by me) in a presumptive notion.
The reliable attitude of a society does in fact separate fairly by magic! at every human separation (and then diagrammatically so) and so shall be one special exhibitor of the powerful circumstances of free contiguity in time (synthreafaction). This means, that Obtainment of the conclusive effort to pretend a valuable consistent sanctuary in focus over the dictation of an offer of double semantics DOES IN FACT REGULATE DOUBLE SEMANTICS in liquidated magic, proving it is in the midsts of controlling any double semantic opportunity where we shall find a most popular edifice for the consumption of role. !
Robert Mayer
In the stage of attentive ability per effort, a vital ordinary scenario is at ends with so many propagations of ground (figurative) that it must be considered a presumptive effort, yet as many valuable sanctions help us resort to fuller calamity we can dispose of this failed pre evaluation as seminal. In the course of what so appears to be such a vital recognition we can disguise it so vehemently because of the ritual motivation for survival being nominal selfishness, yet as the reminiscence follows the cult of such survival we can have it clearly at stake!
All notions through Zi-Focal Pedality (IFS) may exhume a trade of fairness to the whole, mainly that in presumptive composition of fatal effort, the recognition in that people are, or have once been attached, stands to color the very next effort in human conflict. Each and every intelligent or non-intelligent action separation of society requisites the focal temptation to devise secular duty upon the presumptive (thats all of us!) (not even by design of all human conflict.) Any double-semantics scenario has us here for it to be observed, in that all consumptive efforts to relate the substance of a ritual or mission, both, can be supplementary and found especially within the guard of a human being. This does not mean that we are without intelligent double semantics, we are with double semantics. That is to say this; of a GOVERNING of peoples the ideality that open fairness exists does not in fact rely on that only open fairness in double semantics LIVES in our past! Secular vibrations may not attend to this vehemence, and lo! its elucidation may be right upon us now, (for all I know!). The gratitude of a socialization of double semantic laden outgrowth (societal) would not seem in anyway to feel like fluctuation, or to that, be very noticeable at all. The regular attentiveness you can now see, isn't in our noticable behavior, it is only expressed (by me) in a presumptive notion.
The reliable attitude of a society does in fact separate fairly by magic! at every human separation (and then diagrammatically so) and so shall be one special exhibitor of the powerful circumstances of free contiguity in time (synthreafaction). This means, that Obtainment of the conclusive effort to pretend a valuable consistent sanctuary in focus over the dictation of an offer of double semantics DOES IN FACT REGULATE DOUBLE SEMANTICS in liquidated magic, proving it is in the midsts of controlling any double semantic opportunity where we shall find a most popular edifice for the consumption of role. !
Robert Mayer
Mayer's Hierarchy of the Advertences of Religion
Mayer's Hierarchy of the Advertences of Religion
Implicated in this list of the true gamuts of the process of religion here coexist the main elements of the procedure of religion.. These subjects are main points and are some themselves being Acting Points in the procedure of understanding such religion (being within it). The list is as follows..
1 Expression
2 Traditional Gathering
3 Observation
4 Original Recognitions
5 Instruction
6 Self Assistance
7 Self Involvement
8 Exploration
9 Revival
10 Construction
11 Calibration
12 Planning
13 Criticism
14 Performance
15 Commitment
16 Compliance
1 Expression
The primary recognition in ascertainment of the conduct of the cry to survive. Expression here denotes the active consecration that must hum viably throughout the permanence of detail; it denotes the by-way of all thereafter possible animal procession.
2 Traditional Gathering
The survivor holds one further priority, the distinct consuming of resources, be they levied and psychological.
3 Observation
A lasting preference in application remains in the ability to distinguish.
4 Original Recognitions
Past distinguishing information the resolute tendency to find aura amongst the explainable.
5 Instruction
The calculable friendliness amongst the gathered survivor rests not as satiation but as indicted use of the maintenance of allocation and expenditure.
6 Self Assistance
Along any potential for reminiscence the traveling of instructions is viably possible only as needed.
7 Self Involvement
The comparative activity supports only traditional values.
8 Exploration
Otherwise applicable talent maintains its revenue in experience beneficially throughout the tendency to find itself without remainder but in recognition of the opposite constantly (opposite of remainder).
9 Revival
Other tendencies to collect information may be re-discovered through management of the acknowledgement of decisive success.
10 Construction
The beginning of the proof that all success is inherently subconscious, derelict action rests on the ability to find more bounty out of a contradiction with allegiance, that an animal can restore its faith artificially.
11 Calibration
Only now is the advent of perspective based in success a current element, its value to motive rests in only dedication.
12 Planning
The direct imagination reassembles the collision of grant and virtue, thus assembling more experience in shallow dependencies.
13 Criticism
A conscious dictation can only subsequently re-imagine its place in itself.
14 Manipulation
The basic satisfaction over the entire environment can only become something most like a dependence on learning that discovers what it is and what it isn't.
15 Commitment
The supplication of talent as stored for its reservation in indictment where most viable self control is advanced through use and dedication.
16 Compliance
The ultimate resignation that one can not contradict itself can only prove the design that all complication with the world is subconsciously entrained; the soft negotiation with surmountable effort can only be a part of the self.
Implicated in this list of the true gamuts of the process of religion here coexist the main elements of the procedure of religion.. These subjects are main points and are some themselves being Acting Points in the procedure of understanding such religion (being within it). The list is as follows..
1 Expression
2 Traditional Gathering
3 Observation
4 Original Recognitions
5 Instruction
6 Self Assistance
7 Self Involvement
8 Exploration
9 Revival
10 Construction
11 Calibration
12 Planning
13 Criticism
14 Performance
15 Commitment
16 Compliance
1 Expression
The primary recognition in ascertainment of the conduct of the cry to survive. Expression here denotes the active consecration that must hum viably throughout the permanence of detail; it denotes the by-way of all thereafter possible animal procession.
2 Traditional Gathering
The survivor holds one further priority, the distinct consuming of resources, be they levied and psychological.
3 Observation
A lasting preference in application remains in the ability to distinguish.
4 Original Recognitions
Past distinguishing information the resolute tendency to find aura amongst the explainable.
5 Instruction
The calculable friendliness amongst the gathered survivor rests not as satiation but as indicted use of the maintenance of allocation and expenditure.
6 Self Assistance
Along any potential for reminiscence the traveling of instructions is viably possible only as needed.
7 Self Involvement
The comparative activity supports only traditional values.
8 Exploration
Otherwise applicable talent maintains its revenue in experience beneficially throughout the tendency to find itself without remainder but in recognition of the opposite constantly (opposite of remainder).
9 Revival
Other tendencies to collect information may be re-discovered through management of the acknowledgement of decisive success.
10 Construction
The beginning of the proof that all success is inherently subconscious, derelict action rests on the ability to find more bounty out of a contradiction with allegiance, that an animal can restore its faith artificially.
11 Calibration
Only now is the advent of perspective based in success a current element, its value to motive rests in only dedication.
12 Planning
The direct imagination reassembles the collision of grant and virtue, thus assembling more experience in shallow dependencies.
13 Criticism
A conscious dictation can only subsequently re-imagine its place in itself.
14 Manipulation
The basic satisfaction over the entire environment can only become something most like a dependence on learning that discovers what it is and what it isn't.
15 Commitment
The supplication of talent as stored for its reservation in indictment where most viable self control is advanced through use and dedication.
16 Compliance
The ultimate resignation that one can not contradict itself can only prove the design that all complication with the world is subconsciously entrained; the soft negotiation with surmountable effort can only be a part of the self.
(Names) Instilled Dependency in Non-Panoramic Coil, Zi-Focal Pedality
Instilled Dependency in Non-Panoramic Coil, Zi-Focal Pedality
Coil as independent nature reveals that an ideality may in jest depend on more certainty than is whole and just through the envelope of a courier.. One coil in human effort may only describe the center of a batch of human expression; through expression both behavior and nominal "trait" can be described as perfluent fate-causing characteristics.. Because of the categorization of league as a coincidental basis of integrity and bias, humans don't express the category of alignment! but for the registration of parallel enormity. Entire systematics of nominal gesture (NAMES), entire free coils of human registration exhibit cost-accordant respect over the maintenance of a serendipity, and NOT a collusion of doubt and frustration of the infrastructure of morale context.
By standards, the fair mobilization (in a XperfectX economy? [aha!]) allows people to not meet some of their highest relatives of certain center-aimed rubrics. AND so forth in reverse, many peoples rubrics only measure (by eventuality) that they have in fact never restored themselves to such plain averse biological notation. A relevant academy would disguise this elevation of documented intellectual respiration on the voids of solicitation (global-> as in HER solicitation from mind to global outlet). This relative is the retaliatory opposite in judgement and collected sinister power, a judge who can't redeem the fabrication of the lesson who's outlet would defend her. A serendipity here.
Incarnations of truths (family names) that consume people (how they do not interrupt each other) betraggen special doubts and insistences in rhetoric, to not only thus name us names that might bring a lack of contradiction to avert non-Coil figuration in the formation of names (Zi-Focal Pedality) but to bring to the front every channel that possibly lays this fond modality of name. Our persistence is categorizable in sociology but ALSO INTELLIGENTLY in the gamut that we expend our tradition by the faucet of names. (Peoples names rest in zi-focal pedality as designated magical effort and incarnated gesture pre-nominal.)
(http://witnesspsychosisendure.blogspot.com/2016/01/below-is-explanation-of-how-love.html)
People fall back on their friends who must remain impartial to one another (as the only sexual policy).. Rhetoric redeems peoples relation to the cause of our rendition where it beparts those ammunitions and distills the vigorousness of trial, yet never claims that the purpose of diagrammatical shapeshifting is to relent a bastards call to relegate his own calamity.. The trend in healthy detail beyond the force that supplies the endless coil to its deed, only after-gated "meaningfulness" shows the force of a pending "culprit" who admonishes the same benefactors to reliability and causation. (because 1 never meets 2) Thus the only retrouvable tendency in culminated sport is the kindness of the slack of morality -> the pushing redemption to recognize the sister parts of the menacing thought provoking tendency to work through that ONE role is to reprimand the ideality of convoluted thoughts that are only truly the collected complication of a telepathy that signifies the ulterior composite evidence that a sanctuary that has no evidence of its member partner's glory.
In the beneficial records hung by the power of the entire center of faith -> a human all loved, magic and innocent mind, a society collides with our name powers! A treaty designed to rescue the faithful from the fits of our worth can collide with the tantrum of a volley. Whoever may justify delaying the partial winner of his truth shall never coincide with the power of us all, but through names we are forgiven.!!
BEYOND THIS (someone needs to know)
Creation manages the ideality that encouragement comes from the makeshift blockade to expose the perfect solution, thus culminating adequate maneuverability in the motif of manifest motivation. Entrained solution pretends to navigate the all steering power of concrescence (in the letter f). Salvation requisites positive manufacture in glossary of the sheer nominal press of the changing center of self illustration. Certainty revolves around the exponential exhibition where the fallback isn't reconciliation, just camouflage. Along the created self identity the management of policy can only become of the strange relation to fair quality (a comparison to identity-less non-mechanic lack of policy) A centered diagram of the mechanistic of fair human play can only situate the founder from the sort of sustained clause to which the monuments of fair play cant respect the test any longer. The truth is waiting in the minds of our children.
Coil as independent nature reveals that an ideality may in jest depend on more certainty than is whole and just through the envelope of a courier.. One coil in human effort may only describe the center of a batch of human expression; through expression both behavior and nominal "trait" can be described as perfluent fate-causing characteristics.. Because of the categorization of league as a coincidental basis of integrity and bias, humans don't express the category of alignment! but for the registration of parallel enormity. Entire systematics of nominal gesture (NAMES), entire free coils of human registration exhibit cost-accordant respect over the maintenance of a serendipity, and NOT a collusion of doubt and frustration of the infrastructure of morale context.
By standards, the fair mobilization (in a XperfectX economy? [aha!]) allows people to not meet some of their highest relatives of certain center-aimed rubrics. AND so forth in reverse, many peoples rubrics only measure (by eventuality) that they have in fact never restored themselves to such plain averse biological notation. A relevant academy would disguise this elevation of documented intellectual respiration on the voids of solicitation (global-> as in HER solicitation from mind to global outlet). This relative is the retaliatory opposite in judgement and collected sinister power, a judge who can't redeem the fabrication of the lesson who's outlet would defend her. A serendipity here.
Incarnations of truths (family names) that consume people (how they do not interrupt each other) betraggen special doubts and insistences in rhetoric, to not only thus name us names that might bring a lack of contradiction to avert non-Coil figuration in the formation of names (Zi-Focal Pedality) but to bring to the front every channel that possibly lays this fond modality of name. Our persistence is categorizable in sociology but ALSO INTELLIGENTLY in the gamut that we expend our tradition by the faucet of names. (Peoples names rest in zi-focal pedality as designated magical effort and incarnated gesture pre-nominal.)
(http://witnesspsychosisendure.blogspot.com/2016/01/below-is-explanation-of-how-love.html)
People fall back on their friends who must remain impartial to one another (as the only sexual policy).. Rhetoric redeems peoples relation to the cause of our rendition where it beparts those ammunitions and distills the vigorousness of trial, yet never claims that the purpose of diagrammatical shapeshifting is to relent a bastards call to relegate his own calamity.. The trend in healthy detail beyond the force that supplies the endless coil to its deed, only after-gated "meaningfulness" shows the force of a pending "culprit" who admonishes the same benefactors to reliability and causation. (because 1 never meets 2) Thus the only retrouvable tendency in culminated sport is the kindness of the slack of morality -> the pushing redemption to recognize the sister parts of the menacing thought provoking tendency to work through that ONE role is to reprimand the ideality of convoluted thoughts that are only truly the collected complication of a telepathy that signifies the ulterior composite evidence that a sanctuary that has no evidence of its member partner's glory.
In the beneficial records hung by the power of the entire center of faith -> a human all loved, magic and innocent mind, a society collides with our name powers! A treaty designed to rescue the faithful from the fits of our worth can collide with the tantrum of a volley. Whoever may justify delaying the partial winner of his truth shall never coincide with the power of us all, but through names we are forgiven.!!
BEYOND THIS (someone needs to know)
Creation manages the ideality that encouragement comes from the makeshift blockade to expose the perfect solution, thus culminating adequate maneuverability in the motif of manifest motivation. Entrained solution pretends to navigate the all steering power of concrescence (in the letter f). Salvation requisites positive manufacture in glossary of the sheer nominal press of the changing center of self illustration. Certainty revolves around the exponential exhibition where the fallback isn't reconciliation, just camouflage. Along the created self identity the management of policy can only become of the strange relation to fair quality (a comparison to identity-less non-mechanic lack of policy) A centered diagram of the mechanistic of fair human play can only situate the founder from the sort of sustained clause to which the monuments of fair play cant respect the test any longer. The truth is waiting in the minds of our children.
"Omnis"
"Omnis" (ahm-niss)
Perpetual guarantees that a sub-dexterous observation can be made wherever central exclusivity becomes rational and intelligently marked (observed) can avow for the length of a recognition that spoils such wholesome ignition in acknowledged frame and jest. Describing the space or habitat of a main thought can allow hold of disregard for the conclusive truth that any established attentive recognition (of such passive implemented constitution) could and perhaps would potentially argue a perpetual overwriting-based temporary establishment that conjectures a blindness to the esteem in process, (by causing narrow access to a cluse (recluse) of forbidding distinction -> where over-tended rumination of a category of nuances can elicit a lack of proper access to more or other fundamental execution-necessary bits of information in residential knowledge BY ECLIPSE; those made as marked by the irreparable) A fervently significant element (figurative) in this discussion is itself, Electricity..
One categorical extent of a relief from such substance in voluntary battle could accordingly justify its place in the temper of a (human) enterprise. This challenge to acquiesce our substantial cognizant dominion as top-heavy!, this enliven-ingly top-heavy, positions us to solve the context of our mandated eclipses, both independent and more dependent here with visceral solution.. A command by the sentience of rationale could permit-ably accomplish this, but how? Such solution I could call an "omnis", a occupational re-allocation tool, in the occupation that such a tool could be found for better or for worse.
((How does electricity cause non-evaluation? Electricity condemns every pandit mandate overall to suffer blindness in the mind in all that it can eclipse, especially because of its perpetuation. Still the ever present rest of the eclipse items are probably in your disregard.))
More Omnis?
A special artificial rarity for the ignorance of an irreparable one! perpetuation in behavior can donate us a discipline-rarity (disciple) that in remembering a sort of Total-Side would intellectually reflect a subsidiary Domain that can in fact restore property residing in the essence of its act.
Perpetual guarantees that a sub-dexterous observation can be made wherever central exclusivity becomes rational and intelligently marked (observed) can avow for the length of a recognition that spoils such wholesome ignition in acknowledged frame and jest. Describing the space or habitat of a main thought can allow hold of disregard for the conclusive truth that any established attentive recognition (of such passive implemented constitution) could and perhaps would potentially argue a perpetual overwriting-based temporary establishment that conjectures a blindness to the esteem in process, (by causing narrow access to a cluse (recluse) of forbidding distinction -> where over-tended rumination of a category of nuances can elicit a lack of proper access to more or other fundamental execution-necessary bits of information in residential knowledge BY ECLIPSE; those made as marked by the irreparable) A fervently significant element (figurative) in this discussion is itself, Electricity..
One categorical extent of a relief from such substance in voluntary battle could accordingly justify its place in the temper of a (human) enterprise. This challenge to acquiesce our substantial cognizant dominion as top-heavy!, this enliven-ingly top-heavy, positions us to solve the context of our mandated eclipses, both independent and more dependent here with visceral solution.. A command by the sentience of rationale could permit-ably accomplish this, but how? Such solution I could call an "omnis", a occupational re-allocation tool, in the occupation that such a tool could be found for better or for worse.
((How does electricity cause non-evaluation? Electricity condemns every pandit mandate overall to suffer blindness in the mind in all that it can eclipse, especially because of its perpetuation. Still the ever present rest of the eclipse items are probably in your disregard.))
More Omnis?
A special artificial rarity for the ignorance of an irreparable one! perpetuation in behavior can donate us a discipline-rarity (disciple) that in remembering a sort of Total-Side would intellectually reflect a subsidiary Domain that can in fact restore property residing in the essence of its act.
Parallel Dimensional Backdoor in Residential Knowledge *edit
Parallel Dimensional Backdoor in Residential Knowledge,
Atoning for the sins of an empire can redeem a passive err for the bounty of humans if done wrong. Many applicable statements that may conclude that it is in fact possible to atone for the sins of many do not all establish the painted doctrine that the yolk of a societal fabric can stand so easily mastered within the way it can be plainly assumed that one famous solution can be easily assumed in action. The redirecting power of a plain purpose to evolve can cause many a vehement notion to subside, but does the grant of forgiving power itself ever mention how to accomplish the virtue?
A grant itself among living recreational stance can hum the fortune of a re-directive power, the power of a proof of microcosmic benevolence in attainment. Our power here can be accused of many simple results, for it is the power of the identification of Parallel Dimensional Equal Environments. This topic stands very dormant to many humans, or passively unnoticed in its form, diagrammatically poised to expend the corrective effort in the power of the minds role in society. What is this power?
Suppose I resurrect a simple dimensional array, a Book of Spells, which to my fortune works by my efforts.. I could in fact discover its dimensional equal backdoor, once, in a spell for example that allows me to effectively pretend to foster any single-command-qualified noosphere. This unique spell would be, as effectively as I am woven in residential knowledge, the perfect backdoor to save me from the excess involvement in my original residential arena -> (the book of spells itself). Still, it seems as dangerous to inertia as it could be, rather like-ably made to fit the oven, so to speak!
In our limited and savvy fortune, accessing a dimensional backdoor to equivalent parallel virtual environments causes microcosmic attractiveness in exhibitors, and not by a fluke! Note if the pass-through itself has been a valuable discovery when you recommend your imagination to our one-command spell. -> The inhabitant knowledge would not surprise you then, it isn't inhabitant knowledge that makes the find so difficult. Thereon and after though, a recognition is born,, the worth of health may succeed the final perception in exhibition as not just property, but estimated fortune! How then could a person (especially an empath) find itself utilizing a dimensional parallel? It is only, due to the format of residential humanity, that finding such a parallel is as exciting of such an artificial one than one crafted from the likes of prosperity and puberty.. What of this topic that there is such disregard for the fallen?
We can find this exact attractiveness in the focal ability to "trump" any attempt-based array environment successfully, and we all ought to find its value in such a trumping of all of our comprehension between statuses and paradigms.
Robert Mayer
Atoning for the sins of an empire can redeem a passive err for the bounty of humans if done wrong. Many applicable statements that may conclude that it is in fact possible to atone for the sins of many do not all establish the painted doctrine that the yolk of a societal fabric can stand so easily mastered within the way it can be plainly assumed that one famous solution can be easily assumed in action. The redirecting power of a plain purpose to evolve can cause many a vehement notion to subside, but does the grant of forgiving power itself ever mention how to accomplish the virtue?
A grant itself among living recreational stance can hum the fortune of a re-directive power, the power of a proof of microcosmic benevolence in attainment. Our power here can be accused of many simple results, for it is the power of the identification of Parallel Dimensional Equal Environments. This topic stands very dormant to many humans, or passively unnoticed in its form, diagrammatically poised to expend the corrective effort in the power of the minds role in society. What is this power?
Suppose I resurrect a simple dimensional array, a Book of Spells, which to my fortune works by my efforts.. I could in fact discover its dimensional equal backdoor, once, in a spell for example that allows me to effectively pretend to foster any single-command-qualified noosphere. This unique spell would be, as effectively as I am woven in residential knowledge, the perfect backdoor to save me from the excess involvement in my original residential arena -> (the book of spells itself). Still, it seems as dangerous to inertia as it could be, rather like-ably made to fit the oven, so to speak!
In our limited and savvy fortune, accessing a dimensional backdoor to equivalent parallel virtual environments causes microcosmic attractiveness in exhibitors, and not by a fluke! Note if the pass-through itself has been a valuable discovery when you recommend your imagination to our one-command spell. -> The inhabitant knowledge would not surprise you then, it isn't inhabitant knowledge that makes the find so difficult. Thereon and after though, a recognition is born,, the worth of health may succeed the final perception in exhibition as not just property, but estimated fortune! How then could a person (especially an empath) find itself utilizing a dimensional parallel? It is only, due to the format of residential humanity, that finding such a parallel is as exciting of such an artificial one than one crafted from the likes of prosperity and puberty.. What of this topic that there is such disregard for the fallen?
We can find this exact attractiveness in the focal ability to "trump" any attempt-based array environment successfully, and we all ought to find its value in such a trumping of all of our comprehension between statuses and paradigms.
Robert Mayer
Press Dispersal in Chaos
Press Dispersal in Chaos Response
"Stone throws" are not the decipher-er of panoramic cause-and effect. A leash that suspects all of the documented remains of the toils of the matters of synthreafaction (in their acute observation by humans) do not expose the most platonic organization of elemental participation. That is to say that for lack of a better term, causes can be caused, and caused from the causes of those causes, etc. down into an aggravation that sustains what would be the divisive lines of logic that become realized down to the quarks (figurative) of interpreted motivation of matter in Zi-focal Pedality, in hierarchy of probability of occurrence (IFS)
The basic argument that totality exists can sometimes only be measured by the platonic, though the revelation here that a prosperity that is human of a concordance of a noticable human relationship to matters would be popularly observed.
A pulse? Cause-parts can be made of a design, not just like a spider-ing crack but of a confounded relational operation separated in junctions, etc. Expended taut ability to leash a utilization in aggravation , in limited free will, can only surprise the total platonic effort, and there is much more than the discussion of the elements of cause and effect in this discussion. Furthermore, the self inspection in cause of the laughter that is defense from oncoming alignment provides that even magical beings pre-suppose that examining their surroundings and operational laws is priority in the function of the monumental fit of accordance in sustaining proper environmental belonging..
"Stone throws" are not the decipher-er of panoramic cause-and effect. A leash that suspects all of the documented remains of the toils of the matters of synthreafaction (in their acute observation by humans) do not expose the most platonic organization of elemental participation. That is to say that for lack of a better term, causes can be caused, and caused from the causes of those causes, etc. down into an aggravation that sustains what would be the divisive lines of logic that become realized down to the quarks (figurative) of interpreted motivation of matter in Zi-focal Pedality, in hierarchy of probability of occurrence (IFS)
The basic argument that totality exists can sometimes only be measured by the platonic, though the revelation here that a prosperity that is human of a concordance of a noticable human relationship to matters would be popularly observed.
A pulse? Cause-parts can be made of a design, not just like a spider-ing crack but of a confounded relational operation separated in junctions, etc. Expended taut ability to leash a utilization in aggravation , in limited free will, can only surprise the total platonic effort, and there is much more than the discussion of the elements of cause and effect in this discussion. Furthermore, the self inspection in cause of the laughter that is defense from oncoming alignment provides that even magical beings pre-suppose that examining their surroundings and operational laws is priority in the function of the monumental fit of accordance in sustaining proper environmental belonging..
Di-Incidence is Coordinate
In intentional language we must seem to excite ourselves by the notions of probability, but it is in every fact relevant that we redeem our human expeditionary cost-application under the reams that our given words (in probability of occurrence) are both independent and dependent of all course in human success. Continuing, the palatable rationale that would let you imagine that your innocence (the munition of the pedal interference that ordains rendered talent pre-conditionally) is, has, and will be ordained unto expedition under linguistic self categorization -> can pause and relocate the search for another factor in probability of occurrence, of how not only does innocence re-tender the whole approach of our victorious satiatum (in how the story can't rip itself apart) (and by coil and mega coil (IFS)), but in how pride and essence relocate an even more possible specificity in the lengths of received travail in accordance: this being; coordinate di-incidence.
I habilitated the word di-incidence to describe a family member of the word "coincidence", directly to refer originally to the class of a word that would relate "misunderstanding". Still, diincidence would refer to almost any relation-less coincidence in chaos..
Profitable ordainments would exaggerate the lift of a parallel, oncoming creation of sustained interaction, which is to say that nothing exaggerates the final conclusion of a reaction because reactions aren't profitable. Why is nothing at the behest of a very originator still seems to be a well-guarded secret in the passion of an implementation under cure or duress, but under the superstition of the logic that creation stems not from definition but from a point of class that represents a passion-to-the-whole is the scarlet reminiscence of a body of our age, day, and time altogether! This grant follows that even prostitution is characteristic of a distilled rationale, our hearts be with their party all!
The maintenance of an optimal coincidence that bestows us all to the gallant 'Factory 7', or the respiration of an anecdotal flaw in the perception of another cannot bestow us the travesty of an optional redemption. All profits coincide with the courteous manner with which a travail of sun-dancing rain beggars can optimize the routs of their begging. Under solemn brutality is the proof that the cable bends by the fabrics of its force, not by the tally of its recorded hope. Why is diincidence coordinate? Because the rest of a world cannot count that high.
Robert
I habilitated the word di-incidence to describe a family member of the word "coincidence", directly to refer originally to the class of a word that would relate "misunderstanding". Still, diincidence would refer to almost any relation-less coincidence in chaos..
Profitable ordainments would exaggerate the lift of a parallel, oncoming creation of sustained interaction, which is to say that nothing exaggerates the final conclusion of a reaction because reactions aren't profitable. Why is nothing at the behest of a very originator still seems to be a well-guarded secret in the passion of an implementation under cure or duress, but under the superstition of the logic that creation stems not from definition but from a point of class that represents a passion-to-the-whole is the scarlet reminiscence of a body of our age, day, and time altogether! This grant follows that even prostitution is characteristic of a distilled rationale, our hearts be with their party all!
The maintenance of an optimal coincidence that bestows us all to the gallant 'Factory 7', or the respiration of an anecdotal flaw in the perception of another cannot bestow us the travesty of an optional redemption. All profits coincide with the courteous manner with which a travail of sun-dancing rain beggars can optimize the routs of their begging. Under solemn brutality is the proof that the cable bends by the fabrics of its force, not by the tally of its recorded hope. Why is diincidence coordinate? Because the rest of a world cannot count that high.
Robert
Satiation is not Momentary nor Actual, The 90's
Consciousness is Momentary, Actual, and Satiative. Thereafter, satiation is not momentary nor actual.
Binding the verses of the constant addendum of the motes of a mind's congress is the still perception of the radical attitude of the idiosyncratic edge's dastardliness. By function of the correctable notions of the way of the attitude of a verse, the constructed avenue that is focal perception cannot allow us to recognize a toil in work that is the center of the broad discussion of peace, lordship, responsibility and truth.
This category as a center can be described as a vigilant nightmare to thinkers -> a thought eclipse (Omnis, IFS). This thought eclipse can be found in our next major mind-bug, our inability to amalgamate centered thought about the "idiosyncratic".. adue to the great function of the idiosyncratic EVERYTHING amid the sources of thought, the (hyper knowledge is religion) hyper -idiosyncratic can not be found except by expertise. Additionally the brand of thought that relegates the assumption that life can be pragmatically driven aside from the idiosyncratic can not be found in the activity of the perception of satiation. Here, many people have become convinced that the processes of the perception of sarcasm, sardonic and satirical behavior are not idiosyncratic, for failiure to recognize that people are magically what the rest of the people think they are!
In reality the world as possessed by Vaektommer's policy (see blog, Witness Psychosis Endure) can be understood through three magical corianders in chaos magic, three: sarcasm, sardonic, satirical behavior.. These exhibitionary consults are themselves only mechanisms in the processes of perceiving and understanding satiation, which is not momentary nor actual. Therafter tied to the discussion of satiation in the world of people and abstract performing nouns possessing other people, these sarcastic, sardonic, and satirical behavior are thereafter idiosyncratic themselves!
Additionally, I am not an idiot.. I pretend that the hyper idiosyncratic can eclipse the independent idiosyncratic it was my best joke of the 90's
Robert Mayer
Binding the verses of the constant addendum of the motes of a mind's congress is the still perception of the radical attitude of the idiosyncratic edge's dastardliness. By function of the correctable notions of the way of the attitude of a verse, the constructed avenue that is focal perception cannot allow us to recognize a toil in work that is the center of the broad discussion of peace, lordship, responsibility and truth.
This category as a center can be described as a vigilant nightmare to thinkers -> a thought eclipse (Omnis, IFS). This thought eclipse can be found in our next major mind-bug, our inability to amalgamate centered thought about the "idiosyncratic".. adue to the great function of the idiosyncratic EVERYTHING amid the sources of thought, the (hyper knowledge is religion) hyper -idiosyncratic can not be found except by expertise. Additionally the brand of thought that relegates the assumption that life can be pragmatically driven aside from the idiosyncratic can not be found in the activity of the perception of satiation. Here, many people have become convinced that the processes of the perception of sarcasm, sardonic and satirical behavior are not idiosyncratic, for failiure to recognize that people are magically what the rest of the people think they are!
In reality the world as possessed by Vaektommer's policy (see blog, Witness Psychosis Endure) can be understood through three magical corianders in chaos magic, three: sarcasm, sardonic, satirical behavior.. These exhibitionary consults are themselves only mechanisms in the processes of perceiving and understanding satiation, which is not momentary nor actual. Therafter tied to the discussion of satiation in the world of people and abstract performing nouns possessing other people, these sarcastic, sardonic, and satirical behavior are thereafter idiosyncratic themselves!
Additionally, I am not an idiot.. I pretend that the hyper idiosyncratic can eclipse the independent idiosyncratic it was my best joke of the 90's
Robert Mayer
Misunderstanding.
from Chapter 1 from Behavior in Etymology by Robert Thomas Mayer
Misunderstanding
To allow the brevity of the instantaneous itinerary requires carrying the momentous execution priority as foreafter curated by an environment for causing potential responses. No matrix of delinquency nor honored procession of liturgy can surmount to topple the major machinations of the mind’s active restoration. Still, after the reserved iconism of true responsibility in data transfer, the mitigation of the testaments of the procuration of relevant truth can be supposed as the medication by which potential is restored to the axis of occupation. This trance of data formation disguises a forge which prevents, protects, propagates, speciates (and so on) elements in knowledge that find more truth than our resilience can provide this our self iconism.
A graph of responsibility in data transfer: by economies of scale
_____________________________________________
Full prioritization of responsibility in data transfer
_____________________________________________
0 prioritization gamut b
_____________________________________________
0 prioritization gamut c
_____________________________________________
At this graph’s imperfection, any misunderstanding then, is the foremost recognizable action only to its specific grain of occupied interpreter. This means that the self itself cannot recognize EVERY interpretation of fully prioritized responsibility in data transfer. Why is this so? A pretend illustration may allow us to recognize the apprehension of salient rationale as to why the incompetence of prioritization of responsibility is in fact a blessing to the working ignoramus. As per locomotion in the faith of all beings of descended relation, have we crafted the “family business” to resuscitate generationally newly dead ordeals for archaic propagation or do we actually only get some information from some places, some of the time?
I assert, being that the mind can’t entirely fail at something as simple as a misinterpretation, the most evolutionary efficient observational animal must have had a propensity to very easily accept that it can misunderstand, and there-before, be highly predisposed to misunderstanding.
To more than that observation can collect, what crosses the full prioritization of responsibility in data transfer that amends political information travel that has always continued to deny humans their right to EACH satisfy their earnest curiosities? A whole conduct can be formed to allot the full habitat of complaint within the mind, can’t it? This habitat belongs to learning the documentation and supplication of where in fields of knowledge there exist answers of foresight far beyond the rest in economic allocation of working compliance. Why do some mediations of this conundrum fall childishly short of the bastion of its solution? The truth is in magic and culture evolution, before it is observable in the ranks of genetic penetration due to conflict and serendipity. Could we have evolved the facilitation of the dependency of religion in order to survive, or did this propensity to survive misinterpretation evolve much earlier? I assert that the propensity to evolve misunderstanding would cause more survival than the ability of two genetically similar human populations to benefit from loos-est religion in the ducts of historic elimination. And why then must this go unnoticed? And how still does the plausible come true, that the brain is involved with membrane resources that drive status in economies of scale to evolve.
Misunderstanding
To allow the brevity of the instantaneous itinerary requires carrying the momentous execution priority as foreafter curated by an environment for causing potential responses. No matrix of delinquency nor honored procession of liturgy can surmount to topple the major machinations of the mind’s active restoration. Still, after the reserved iconism of true responsibility in data transfer, the mitigation of the testaments of the procuration of relevant truth can be supposed as the medication by which potential is restored to the axis of occupation. This trance of data formation disguises a forge which prevents, protects, propagates, speciates (and so on) elements in knowledge that find more truth than our resilience can provide this our self iconism.
A graph of responsibility in data transfer: by economies of scale
_____________________________________________
Full prioritization of responsibility in data transfer
_____________________________________________
0 prioritization gamut b
_____________________________________________
0 prioritization gamut c
_____________________________________________
At this graph’s imperfection, any misunderstanding then, is the foremost recognizable action only to its specific grain of occupied interpreter. This means that the self itself cannot recognize EVERY interpretation of fully prioritized responsibility in data transfer. Why is this so? A pretend illustration may allow us to recognize the apprehension of salient rationale as to why the incompetence of prioritization of responsibility is in fact a blessing to the working ignoramus. As per locomotion in the faith of all beings of descended relation, have we crafted the “family business” to resuscitate generationally newly dead ordeals for archaic propagation or do we actually only get some information from some places, some of the time?
I assert, being that the mind can’t entirely fail at something as simple as a misinterpretation, the most evolutionary efficient observational animal must have had a propensity to very easily accept that it can misunderstand, and there-before, be highly predisposed to misunderstanding.
To more than that observation can collect, what crosses the full prioritization of responsibility in data transfer that amends political information travel that has always continued to deny humans their right to EACH satisfy their earnest curiosities? A whole conduct can be formed to allot the full habitat of complaint within the mind, can’t it? This habitat belongs to learning the documentation and supplication of where in fields of knowledge there exist answers of foresight far beyond the rest in economic allocation of working compliance. Why do some mediations of this conundrum fall childishly short of the bastion of its solution? The truth is in magic and culture evolution, before it is observable in the ranks of genetic penetration due to conflict and serendipity. Could we have evolved the facilitation of the dependency of religion in order to survive, or did this propensity to survive misinterpretation evolve much earlier? I assert that the propensity to evolve misunderstanding would cause more survival than the ability of two genetically similar human populations to benefit from loos-est religion in the ducts of historic elimination. And why then must this go unnoticed? And how still does the plausible come true, that the brain is involved with membrane resources that drive status in economies of scale to evolve.
Re-Observiums
Re-Observiums
Challenges can collect the better of a positioned or toiling human (as component) in tactile versatility. Today, a registration of empathetic estimation seems perfluent in a discussion of remarkable intimidation; it collects a thought error more vigorous than the travel of characteristic belonging in the race to significant posterity. Error, because the most part of the activation seems to be prepared at a junction pre-comprehensively, where foundry in re-observium is used to empathetic-ally calibrate other people. The esteem by which the verse of our focal challenge here lies in occupation! is a challenge which cannot be sought after as part of the distinct romance between edict and moral path, but only as manageable reconnaissance which enunciates effort to give the relation between motivation and the trust of role by recognizable simple faction. It can be seen as a readiness to pretend to absorb a most multi-basic passive acknowledgement for social movement donated to by inspiration, and by captivation shared.
A political guidance can be reserved for the tradition, here it extends the occurrence of many translatable energies.. Our prevalent motion relies on the distinct want! that remembers the generations of powerful recompense in egerviandic beginning, namely the passage of the "responsibility" to find crisis in the exasperation of fluctuating remainder herein, where the gross input recognized by the fabric specialty can not in history have remained promised to the remedial guidance of the trappist whore who conjugates the responsibility herself. Notable promises to the relief of the confusion surrounding re-observiums cannot be stated without instruction-ally parting from basics in role, thus our examination. Re-observium control is a talent where preoccupied observation comes to stand opposed to natural self condemnation in others by standing over empathetic rationale that can forego a corrected travail through lenience, and is a framework that proves how self-centered a person makes himself generous. It feels like waiting to correct someone.
Mitigation in re-observiums
The designated motion of the use of re-observiums is crucial to inertia and therefore innocence. Only however, can the false translations of monitored injunction recede by the menace who can truly naturally identify and compose all rationale upon redirection; thereafter the only moderator of re-observiums is, canonically, the sober self-re-assembler (the total self-absorbed thinker). He, the self absorbed thinker, can notice change.. Focal transition in the whelms of re-observiums brings want of the truest protection from negligence here, the human must perform a relinquishing dogma over every social perpendicularity, its ghost in re-observiums is not exempt. Again, the liar can tell of bashful gains should he responsibly manufacture discourse in under-microcosmic tampering; thereafter, willingness to find expectation in such tampering can build something of a different human for its utilization. In the stupendous principle identifying the mark of such action people can redeem themselves a bastion of fervid works of self-orienting misplacement socially. Anointing them workers of the deed is not valuable, but individually the presentation of the working majority of the structure of self-orienting misplacement or condemnation is only a natural and necessary mechanism for anti-corruption therein. The modern human holds every right to self-originate bastion protection from that negligence towards his own fate, but must be allowed to self-assemble freely for the winter of his aggression.
Below are some examples of the conditions of empathetic assembly:
Making Politics, Position, Remembering, Friendship, Docility, Rapport, Patenting, Encouragement, Distinguishing
Robert Mayer
Challenges can collect the better of a positioned or toiling human (as component) in tactile versatility. Today, a registration of empathetic estimation seems perfluent in a discussion of remarkable intimidation; it collects a thought error more vigorous than the travel of characteristic belonging in the race to significant posterity. Error, because the most part of the activation seems to be prepared at a junction pre-comprehensively, where foundry in re-observium is used to empathetic-ally calibrate other people. The esteem by which the verse of our focal challenge here lies in occupation! is a challenge which cannot be sought after as part of the distinct romance between edict and moral path, but only as manageable reconnaissance which enunciates effort to give the relation between motivation and the trust of role by recognizable simple faction. It can be seen as a readiness to pretend to absorb a most multi-basic passive acknowledgement for social movement donated to by inspiration, and by captivation shared.
A political guidance can be reserved for the tradition, here it extends the occurrence of many translatable energies.. Our prevalent motion relies on the distinct want! that remembers the generations of powerful recompense in egerviandic beginning, namely the passage of the "responsibility" to find crisis in the exasperation of fluctuating remainder herein, where the gross input recognized by the fabric specialty can not in history have remained promised to the remedial guidance of the trappist whore who conjugates the responsibility herself. Notable promises to the relief of the confusion surrounding re-observiums cannot be stated without instruction-ally parting from basics in role, thus our examination. Re-observium control is a talent where preoccupied observation comes to stand opposed to natural self condemnation in others by standing over empathetic rationale that can forego a corrected travail through lenience, and is a framework that proves how self-centered a person makes himself generous. It feels like waiting to correct someone.
Mitigation in re-observiums
The designated motion of the use of re-observiums is crucial to inertia and therefore innocence. Only however, can the false translations of monitored injunction recede by the menace who can truly naturally identify and compose all rationale upon redirection; thereafter the only moderator of re-observiums is, canonically, the sober self-re-assembler (the total self-absorbed thinker). He, the self absorbed thinker, can notice change.. Focal transition in the whelms of re-observiums brings want of the truest protection from negligence here, the human must perform a relinquishing dogma over every social perpendicularity, its ghost in re-observiums is not exempt. Again, the liar can tell of bashful gains should he responsibly manufacture discourse in under-microcosmic tampering; thereafter, willingness to find expectation in such tampering can build something of a different human for its utilization. In the stupendous principle identifying the mark of such action people can redeem themselves a bastion of fervid works of self-orienting misplacement socially. Anointing them workers of the deed is not valuable, but individually the presentation of the working majority of the structure of self-orienting misplacement or condemnation is only a natural and necessary mechanism for anti-corruption therein. The modern human holds every right to self-originate bastion protection from that negligence towards his own fate, but must be allowed to self-assemble freely for the winter of his aggression.
Below are some examples of the conditions of empathetic assembly:
Making Politics, Position, Remembering, Friendship, Docility, Rapport, Patenting, Encouragement, Distinguishing
Robert Mayer
Re-Liquidated (Ulterior) Gamma
Re-Liquidated (Ulterior) Gamma
In Education, Lasting Primordial Nature
(gamma is a positive noun referring figuratively to "a third thing in order")
Reaching out to venerated tandems of initiative and volleyed schemes of protection can resign the obligatory gestation of the clear form in standard monition. With regards to the overlook of the parallel enormity; the viscous re-dampening of a field of notions come towards the reckoning to be felt as the observer, conditioned; the field of mornings whose congress is of the trade of effort is beyond the christening of the following who redesigns his bashful negotiation with the tidal resumption of duty entirely.. This means, no one person stands true to the volley as all-repaired, strangely natural of a consortium that brings his feelings to the main problematic as the successful AVERAGE Enlightened citizen of fortune. Thus we can represent yet an average nocturnal presence for the presumed, thus characterizing it as: reaching-for-the-best-yet-managing-by-interpretation. This scolding novelty is pristine as the evident, B Curator. (B meaning divergence in the perpendicular sense, for our purposes as "remembering interference-accustom-izing residing curator" who lands no suffering on gadget preposition)
The channel of procurement that dwells in this relation cannot be consumed, edited, it is universally stated throughout the problematics of representation of 'one student amongst many' (in contiguous time, IFS). The result beckons for savvy excellence for the position of the electable in propagation of cull and behavior by innocence and intelligent co-regulation, (IFS). Of the inner sample size a sociological perspective can be drawn, that the presumptive aggregate tessellation cannot be dethroned or bitten with sadism by the front of a lofty mechanic's ardor, shown only may there be just the acceptable key and turn subjunctive lesson for the gamut of individuality to be the eye of the rope, so to speak.
The cataclysm; this "letter b" puzz-solution de-aggravates hope thus composing a bridged irony in decoded elitism, again,. the herded elite can tend to pre-oppose themselves to bridged irony in statistics of the whole, where they "respond" (figuratively) to mass conjunction, but as individuals can be seen roping their own hassle toughening the mitigated cordiality of expense by surviving the exposure to their re-dampening of a field of notions come towards the reckoning to be felt as the observer, conditioned. This happens over re-fielding the gamma for exhibited liquident behavior, for rationing to others some immobilities in succession, additionally served through ulterior gamma. This disclosure can allow descendants of learning to survive at different times, for different reasons, in different pressures and by different conditions. In our absorption a conduct must collect the qualifications in an investigation; how a capability to court semantics with respect of this B Curating, that revolutionizes advance in mitigial conduct thereafter wouldn't so much as effect the prosperity of an ability to utilize chaos magic and direct advances in primordial nature ecologically.
Robert
In Education, Lasting Primordial Nature
(gamma is a positive noun referring figuratively to "a third thing in order")
Reaching out to venerated tandems of initiative and volleyed schemes of protection can resign the obligatory gestation of the clear form in standard monition. With regards to the overlook of the parallel enormity; the viscous re-dampening of a field of notions come towards the reckoning to be felt as the observer, conditioned; the field of mornings whose congress is of the trade of effort is beyond the christening of the following who redesigns his bashful negotiation with the tidal resumption of duty entirely.. This means, no one person stands true to the volley as all-repaired, strangely natural of a consortium that brings his feelings to the main problematic as the successful AVERAGE Enlightened citizen of fortune. Thus we can represent yet an average nocturnal presence for the presumed, thus characterizing it as: reaching-for-the-best-yet-managing-by-interpretation. This scolding novelty is pristine as the evident, B Curator. (B meaning divergence in the perpendicular sense, for our purposes as "remembering interference-accustom-izing residing curator" who lands no suffering on gadget preposition)
The channel of procurement that dwells in this relation cannot be consumed, edited, it is universally stated throughout the problematics of representation of 'one student amongst many' (in contiguous time, IFS). The result beckons for savvy excellence for the position of the electable in propagation of cull and behavior by innocence and intelligent co-regulation, (IFS). Of the inner sample size a sociological perspective can be drawn, that the presumptive aggregate tessellation cannot be dethroned or bitten with sadism by the front of a lofty mechanic's ardor, shown only may there be just the acceptable key and turn subjunctive lesson for the gamut of individuality to be the eye of the rope, so to speak.
The cataclysm; this "letter b" puzz-solution de-aggravates hope thus composing a bridged irony in decoded elitism, again,. the herded elite can tend to pre-oppose themselves to bridged irony in statistics of the whole, where they "respond" (figuratively) to mass conjunction, but as individuals can be seen roping their own hassle toughening the mitigated cordiality of expense by surviving the exposure to their re-dampening of a field of notions come towards the reckoning to be felt as the observer, conditioned. This happens over re-fielding the gamma for exhibited liquident behavior, for rationing to others some immobilities in succession, additionally served through ulterior gamma. This disclosure can allow descendants of learning to survive at different times, for different reasons, in different pressures and by different conditions. In our absorption a conduct must collect the qualifications in an investigation; how a capability to court semantics with respect of this B Curating, that revolutionizes advance in mitigial conduct thereafter wouldn't so much as effect the prosperity of an ability to utilize chaos magic and direct advances in primordial nature ecologically.
Robert
Microcosms, Elemental Non-Factors, Primciment
Microcosms, Elemental Non-Factors, Primciment
Aside the astronomical behemoth guardian-ism that protects the complication of deterred mindsets that linger in the scene of the practiced nominal condition (trainumvariate), the condition to sanctified gregariousness lingers more the effectual commitment; lo and behold! All union utilizing the contraction of complicated scorn in monumental gift alone would show us the totality of a memory that awaits!
___
The worthwhile conversation here needs a backstory in a term called a "primciment". Any most effectual consignment in virtue can be considered predicate (not predicted?) rational guidance through the make-stuff of its organization (lateral). Primciment is any material of the alias of addition in traction. Primciment is any collusion in [Coordinate Di-Incidence, IFS] compatible as muscle, extradition, etc. ( concern de poignization ) This primciment is detailed by the collaboration of photographs, idiomatic expression etc., and is kept within calibration and critical devicism. It is the essence of ghost and also (the primciment) of my letter D that a professor stole from me because I am innocent.
___
The prostitution of diincidence as coordinate brings folly to the crass gentle, because of manipulation beyond the practice of adjustment. These primciments and (folly altogether) are not the trend in macro-organization, because all primciment is magically fostered though, ye driven by the sense of microcosmic identity that colludes in partition (twice? because of the brain do I ask..) of recognizable action.. Although together in condition under diagnostic observation would we recognize that although primciment occurs in coordinate diincidence, microcosms (all felled brought and retooled at the moments alertness in chaos magic within us all) do in fact ligitimize the proliferation of execution by conduct alone. This statement is to require that this is why the rape of instill-ment is not practiced legally. Converging at the methodology that sanctimony is required can settle the eviction of the constant rebuilding of the practice of good, that sentiment gally redeems evidential reorganization. Why would microcosms guide and control our primciment? Does the farthest rainblossom really tell us to evict it from its place in our standards?
Robert Mayer
Aside the astronomical behemoth guardian-ism that protects the complication of deterred mindsets that linger in the scene of the practiced nominal condition (trainumvariate), the condition to sanctified gregariousness lingers more the effectual commitment; lo and behold! All union utilizing the contraction of complicated scorn in monumental gift alone would show us the totality of a memory that awaits!
___
The worthwhile conversation here needs a backstory in a term called a "primciment". Any most effectual consignment in virtue can be considered predicate (not predicted?) rational guidance through the make-stuff of its organization (lateral). Primciment is any material of the alias of addition in traction. Primciment is any collusion in [Coordinate Di-Incidence, IFS] compatible as muscle, extradition, etc. ( concern de poignization ) This primciment is detailed by the collaboration of photographs, idiomatic expression etc., and is kept within calibration and critical devicism. It is the essence of ghost and also (the primciment) of my letter D that a professor stole from me because I am innocent.
___
The prostitution of diincidence as coordinate brings folly to the crass gentle, because of manipulation beyond the practice of adjustment. These primciments and (folly altogether) are not the trend in macro-organization, because all primciment is magically fostered though, ye driven by the sense of microcosmic identity that colludes in partition (twice? because of the brain do I ask..) of recognizable action.. Although together in condition under diagnostic observation would we recognize that although primciment occurs in coordinate diincidence, microcosms (all felled brought and retooled at the moments alertness in chaos magic within us all) do in fact ligitimize the proliferation of execution by conduct alone. This statement is to require that this is why the rape of instill-ment is not practiced legally. Converging at the methodology that sanctimony is required can settle the eviction of the constant rebuilding of the practice of good, that sentiment gally redeems evidential reorganization. Why would microcosms guide and control our primciment? Does the farthest rainblossom really tell us to evict it from its place in our standards?
Robert Mayer
Exeplemisms, "Mayer"s as Chrono-Parents, Contraband Soliloquy
Exeplemisms, "Mayer"s as Chrono-Parents, Contraband Soliloquy
Contradictory be-comings can be lost in the effort of proprietary coincidence.. Contemporary issues in the many predicament revolving around the 'compassion' where-then idiomatic press is funneled into more licensed predicament, only full contemplation in zi-focal pedality, the reservist of both tradition and alienation are supposedly the proper navigation in blunt cognizance. Alert propagations of the coordinate complexity of the "in-the-door" (incarnated) moonshine of blunt navigation would seem to level any averse tactician's novelty.. But! the creation of contemplative predication is in fact contemporary to almost any and all prosperity in leverage in the passage of time.
Exeplemism in the territory in conference to the lasting manual foster-space would allow the critical affirmation that the conduct internal to the veneration of the concern for technicality can be ramified as collusive-ly aware before the generative schemes of a magician or politician.
_ _Chrono Parents - a "Mayer Syndrome"
'Mayer' the name allows ritual significance to become of peoples immediate internal representation that in mutation where the values recording mitigation that the simplest verse provided, "that it(something) may", can congenial-ize for the superstitious a fulcrum for the providing of magic to the believer, accustomed or unaccustomed. By the staunch evaluation of the process of having this sort of mitigated venerality, there exists a form of Chrono Parent, an inundation of some sort of secretarial providence that may be cast in our Mayer Syndrome predicament; verily, in how any innocent Mayer can be remarkably fashioned as an exact ruminoid parallel tactician who can let chaos magic allow the adjustment to the exact denotality to become a moderated conditional knower of ultra-basic maturity and information in infinite time. When Mayer's don't get to experience what they want not in the present future or past, until someone lets them out of their Mayer Syndrome, they get to respawn.. On Earth..
http://wpeleague.blogspot.com/2016/01/below-is-explanation-of-how-love.html)
Robert Mayer
Contradictory be-comings can be lost in the effort of proprietary coincidence.. Contemporary issues in the many predicament revolving around the 'compassion' where-then idiomatic press is funneled into more licensed predicament, only full contemplation in zi-focal pedality, the reservist of both tradition and alienation are supposedly the proper navigation in blunt cognizance. Alert propagations of the coordinate complexity of the "in-the-door" (incarnated) moonshine of blunt navigation would seem to level any averse tactician's novelty.. But! the creation of contemplative predication is in fact contemporary to almost any and all prosperity in leverage in the passage of time.
Exeplemism in the territory in conference to the lasting manual foster-space would allow the critical affirmation that the conduct internal to the veneration of the concern for technicality can be ramified as collusive-ly aware before the generative schemes of a magician or politician.
_ _Chrono Parents - a "Mayer Syndrome"
'Mayer' the name allows ritual significance to become of peoples immediate internal representation that in mutation where the values recording mitigation that the simplest verse provided, "that it(something) may", can congenial-ize for the superstitious a fulcrum for the providing of magic to the believer, accustomed or unaccustomed. By the staunch evaluation of the process of having this sort of mitigated venerality, there exists a form of Chrono Parent, an inundation of some sort of secretarial providence that may be cast in our Mayer Syndrome predicament; verily, in how any innocent Mayer can be remarkably fashioned as an exact ruminoid parallel tactician who can let chaos magic allow the adjustment to the exact denotality to become a moderated conditional knower of ultra-basic maturity and information in infinite time. When Mayer's don't get to experience what they want not in the present future or past, until someone lets them out of their Mayer Syndrome, they get to respawn.. On Earth..
http://wpeleague.blogspot.com/2016/01/below-is-explanation-of-how-love.html)
Robert Mayer
Poignzubbing ; Innocence is a Vitality (How does innocence function)
Innocence is part of a special universally organized nexus for Predicament and Registry, describable as something like a "Failure Depository" that records the instantaneous tropical set of proprietary active talent. The device that controls innocence is represented as a utility in every single human; transfer under the capacity of each by chaos magic and primordial nature.. All strain of human evil itself is only competent in its curriculum in order to utilize this single Failure Depository, the Innocence Depository. All utilizable human evil only occurs in staple to the working of the magical Depository. Innocence precedes talent (IFS); but Innocence's role is itself manu-form and built on a foundry through magical axis'. When someone makes you innocent, it occurs by a systematic overflow of magical triangulation which causes summit to unit-flexes of the precarious failure registry. [The human body would then precede to utilize the failure registry to begin to communicate the compatible reactionary discourse with which there is allowed further growth]
The majority of thought in the trainumvariate (IFS) can most easily be understood as the frantic reaction of one mind's ability (not to contemplate use or veneration) but to hone predicament and registry; but not for oneself.. The use of honing such meticulation is for the proprietary competitive triangulation for how every single human is actively using their only evil to compromise tethers of specific, specific human registry for the procreation of the allowance of direct new delta through chaos magic.. Each human is thereby directly affected by how its talent is matched into the Failure Depository [a nexus accessible by direct imagination in the make-stuff of every evil person's imagination].. and affected by how any person who can find its position and likeness in the Failure Depository, in order to trigger a registry for the procreation of delta.. [this is why you can't function when people are worrying about you] [this is why my moniker, Fforkt shall surely supply me with immortality: the mission of Fforkt is to reactivate people's registered talent after it has been "Poignzubbed"]. This begins a conversation about meta-physics for another session.
Why is Poignization relevant here?.. I would only consider valuable talent in idiosyncrasy if it were manifested as gaining relevance to the needs of others, and I urge others to continue the procedure.
Self Registration
Can a person become innocent all on their own? There is a two part answer.. In the illusion that life lives on an independent diversity in action, the answer is yes.. Considering however the Vaektommer's policy, (IFS) that we know even where satirical, sarcastic and sardonic behavior is idiosyncratic, we also know that this is where people are what other people think they are; all innocence happens through coordinate diincidence!
For the sound of human rights, I believe that every human is born with the b-shaping (IFS) to utilize idiosyncrasy.
Robert Mayer
The majority of thought in the trainumvariate (IFS) can most easily be understood as the frantic reaction of one mind's ability (not to contemplate use or veneration) but to hone predicament and registry; but not for oneself.. The use of honing such meticulation is for the proprietary competitive triangulation for how every single human is actively using their only evil to compromise tethers of specific, specific human registry for the procreation of the allowance of direct new delta through chaos magic.. Each human is thereby directly affected by how its talent is matched into the Failure Depository [a nexus accessible by direct imagination in the make-stuff of every evil person's imagination].. and affected by how any person who can find its position and likeness in the Failure Depository, in order to trigger a registry for the procreation of delta.. [this is why you can't function when people are worrying about you] [this is why my moniker, Fforkt shall surely supply me with immortality: the mission of Fforkt is to reactivate people's registered talent after it has been "Poignzubbed"]. This begins a conversation about meta-physics for another session.
Why is Poignization relevant here?.. I would only consider valuable talent in idiosyncrasy if it were manifested as gaining relevance to the needs of others, and I urge others to continue the procedure.
Self Registration
Can a person become innocent all on their own? There is a two part answer.. In the illusion that life lives on an independent diversity in action, the answer is yes.. Considering however the Vaektommer's policy, (IFS) that we know even where satirical, sarcastic and sardonic behavior is idiosyncratic, we also know that this is where people are what other people think they are; all innocence happens through coordinate diincidence!
For the sound of human rights, I believe that every human is born with the b-shaping (IFS) to utilize idiosyncrasy.
Robert Mayer
What is the Youngest Natoli?
Before explaining its role in magic I must allow a context of a universe in this post. Allow me to explain the graph above.
First we will use one of my names, Vargues.. Vargues means 'persistence' but also refers to the fact that as inherently claimed of a part universal harmony, PERSISTANCE would not be wiped from existence given any circumstance.. I, a Vargues, of course am person 1. In this graph I'm telling person 2 that I will not be destroyed should i have no connection to the rest of any element of synthreafaction at all.. Remember Coordinate Diincidence (IFS).
I tell person 2 that disconnection from the rest of the local matter will never stop me. He says, yes but in coordinate diincidence you said that of us, even though you might never be connected to my universe EVER from then on.. Person 2 whilst saying that has subliminally invoked a new graph for his re-interaction in the youngest amoeba chart originally. His reaction however is bound to how the universe will not let the youngest amoeba be destroyed, which means that if the youngest amoeba were person 1 and not just a younger amoeba, it would be amoeba 2 who is bound to killing the youngest amoeba, in that he can't. Time itself would only allow for the youngest amoeba to be replaced with priority to the continuation of the universe.. The orange text does not resemble activation, only universal boundary..
The Vargues' claim to existence cannot be caused by person 2, neither can the vast majority of the identity of the conversation itself, IN COORDINATE DIINCIDENCE. This is because they are not both the youngest amoebas, and that by link to the indestructible magic one has to be planned into the other's time-stream.. The universe will attest to such that anything somewhere in the universe will interact with the survival of the youngest amoeba.. Person 2 can only identify with his inability to destroy [person 1] but again, the diincidence is coordinate so that the absolute youngest amoeba will not need to destroy itself.. Any person but the local innocent will be made to organize full of commitment that isn't written by a drive for the most innocence to re-compel the world to a succinct closure.
Two complete truths. First, magic is real in that anything in the universe will happen on the path to killing the youngest amoeba, even though more magic prioritizes the survival of the innocent. Second, the fallout whereby action is summoned does in fact revolve around the brute limits of the universe, that we can be bound to ultra-thematic option and that even symbolics and figures would represent the universe para-normally.
Before the resemblance of the totality of the veneration of an active present, the resilience of the flow of ideas would be to plane over the compass that is the reveling-over of the constructions of the passive action, only the witnessing of truths near absolute.. ! Only by finding the commitment to our necessary inabilities can the development of pioneering of change become manifest. The absolute youngest's function is to resemble the evolved animal competence, to retest the compulsion to consume on its way to finding the wall!
This compulsion is a major function in the science of Poignzubbing. Poignzubbing does not happen in someones head, or even in activation, it is simply made of elements that precede the universe being challenged by chaos, or opportunity.
Robert Mayer
First we will use one of my names, Vargues.. Vargues means 'persistence' but also refers to the fact that as inherently claimed of a part universal harmony, PERSISTANCE would not be wiped from existence given any circumstance.. I, a Vargues, of course am person 1. In this graph I'm telling person 2 that I will not be destroyed should i have no connection to the rest of any element of synthreafaction at all.. Remember Coordinate Diincidence (IFS).
I tell person 2 that disconnection from the rest of the local matter will never stop me. He says, yes but in coordinate diincidence you said that of us, even though you might never be connected to my universe EVER from then on.. Person 2 whilst saying that has subliminally invoked a new graph for his re-interaction in the youngest amoeba chart originally. His reaction however is bound to how the universe will not let the youngest amoeba be destroyed, which means that if the youngest amoeba were person 1 and not just a younger amoeba, it would be amoeba 2 who is bound to killing the youngest amoeba, in that he can't. Time itself would only allow for the youngest amoeba to be replaced with priority to the continuation of the universe.. The orange text does not resemble activation, only universal boundary..
The Vargues' claim to existence cannot be caused by person 2, neither can the vast majority of the identity of the conversation itself, IN COORDINATE DIINCIDENCE. This is because they are not both the youngest amoebas, and that by link to the indestructible magic one has to be planned into the other's time-stream.. The universe will attest to such that anything somewhere in the universe will interact with the survival of the youngest amoeba.. Person 2 can only identify with his inability to destroy [person 1] but again, the diincidence is coordinate so that the absolute youngest amoeba will not need to destroy itself.. Any person but the local innocent will be made to organize full of commitment that isn't written by a drive for the most innocence to re-compel the world to a succinct closure.
Two complete truths. First, magic is real in that anything in the universe will happen on the path to killing the youngest amoeba, even though more magic prioritizes the survival of the innocent. Second, the fallout whereby action is summoned does in fact revolve around the brute limits of the universe, that we can be bound to ultra-thematic option and that even symbolics and figures would represent the universe para-normally.
Before the resemblance of the totality of the veneration of an active present, the resilience of the flow of ideas would be to plane over the compass that is the reveling-over of the constructions of the passive action, only the witnessing of truths near absolute.. ! Only by finding the commitment to our necessary inabilities can the development of pioneering of change become manifest. The absolute youngest's function is to resemble the evolved animal competence, to retest the compulsion to consume on its way to finding the wall!
This compulsion is a major function in the science of Poignzubbing. Poignzubbing does not happen in someones head, or even in activation, it is simply made of elements that precede the universe being challenged by chaos, or opportunity.
Robert Mayer
Using Parallel Dimensional Back Doors
Using Parallel Dimensional Back Doors in "Trumping" Virtual Environments to Correct Allegorical Misunderstanding
Power contains the vivid remaking of the justice in fortitude. Naming branches of category can select the tandem in roust, but the creation of readiness can present towering platonic zeal. Inherent in the vehement positive construction feedback following anyone's ability to use element-based topic see-through in conversational method, which I had previously called "opening parallel dimensional back doors in virtual environments", (IFS) is the near sight concerning a focal remnant in our passion that the brain warrants as high priority for attempted preservation in culture (in what we call "joking")
As below the topic would represent an ability to reverse affect-conclave in pilot sanity; a consumptive barrier to preserved machination in innocence that I will call "allegorical misunderstanding".
Finding basics from the exposition of correcting allegorical misunderstanding would be a fray channel to a characteristic optimization to collect the beneficial accumulation; Spiked Free Will (IFS) would be worth a champion to the collection of derivative functions.. Suppose we were strict in the verse of a worthwhile practice, librarian-ship in collection of what is a "syndrome". THIS IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE, but admit a hypothetical object morality, that a once imaginary syndrome,, let us call it "mikenowers" syndrome, is actually compared preserved-ly to describe The Syndrome that cures you of all allegorical disruptive self-attention born through factors unto this -> knowing what a syndrome, corps, or vanity is. Given hypothetical truth, belief in "mikenowers" would prepare the element 'mikenowers' as a parallel dimensional back door to virtual environment simplicity, this time not used to open a unique parallel dimension as born of reward, but now useful in opening parallels for the preservation of our perfect type dimension : syndrome, corps, or vanity.
Robert Mayer
Power contains the vivid remaking of the justice in fortitude. Naming branches of category can select the tandem in roust, but the creation of readiness can present towering platonic zeal. Inherent in the vehement positive construction feedback following anyone's ability to use element-based topic see-through in conversational method, which I had previously called "opening parallel dimensional back doors in virtual environments", (IFS) is the near sight concerning a focal remnant in our passion that the brain warrants as high priority for attempted preservation in culture (in what we call "joking")
As below the topic would represent an ability to reverse affect-conclave in pilot sanity; a consumptive barrier to preserved machination in innocence that I will call "allegorical misunderstanding".
Finding basics from the exposition of correcting allegorical misunderstanding would be a fray channel to a characteristic optimization to collect the beneficial accumulation; Spiked Free Will (IFS) would be worth a champion to the collection of derivative functions.. Suppose we were strict in the verse of a worthwhile practice, librarian-ship in collection of what is a "syndrome". THIS IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE, but admit a hypothetical object morality, that a once imaginary syndrome,, let us call it "mikenowers" syndrome, is actually compared preserved-ly to describe The Syndrome that cures you of all allegorical disruptive self-attention born through factors unto this -> knowing what a syndrome, corps, or vanity is. Given hypothetical truth, belief in "mikenowers" would prepare the element 'mikenowers' as a parallel dimensional back door to virtual environment simplicity, this time not used to open a unique parallel dimension as born of reward, but now useful in opening parallels for the preservation of our perfect type dimension : syndrome, corps, or vanity.
Robert Mayer
Allegorical Performance
I have not equipped this blog with the residential capability to yet prove hereafter the main scourge of the reasonings below but I plan on offering 2 disquotias for the standard to be met with its timely manifestation.
In our semblance of tuition towards transcendence we would register the Plainest Observation:
Our workload represents major galleries of expedition
1 Independent Instructional Decoy
2 Dependent Instructional Decoy that does not experience
3 Dependent Instructional Decoy that does experience
4 Information being Passed back Through our Immediate Pasts
[here our disquotias, not all of my origination
Artifices - any and all acting points fostered through our galleries of expedition
Monitions - competitive banks in the recesses of analytical propriety, those whose information traverse between artifices]
Dialectic and fetched observation can be found in the recesses of our most gracious impediment. Tries towards competitive dominance in the realms of satisfactory embellishments would grace us to revolve around the corruptive, not calculated precarious gambits of illusiory propulsion. However, standard predication emits compulsion of traced rhythmic effort, prefunction. We would call it quit if for not its becoming as the writ of poisons, complete in esoteric function. Here i claim the acknowledgment of worsened folks. The culprit and ultimate antagonist: Allegorical Performance. Pride in fortune here does not etch us well in its abodes. Here now our enemy.
When reactions compel the safekeeping of the solution towards learning without worshiping thought, the kind simplest doctrine would persevere as notable. When broad information is wrapped up in allegorical winter, the sufferer loses.
The operation given by the condemnation of prime concourse shows what becomes of those prone to allegorical computation. Those with memories wrapped in allegory would under-perform, those with memories not wrapped in allegories would perform exceptionally.
To speak of this allegorical performance one must become adamant, all is well, but the definition of ones commitment to the topic can be found in ordinary people. Readers in prophesy decide through mentions of a catapult in esoterics; fortunate peoples dwell in the ranks of herald opportunity to their midsts, mainly thus speaking: One successful hero would mock his preparation to use our not-so-heralded secret: A hero never uses original connection aspiration rumination as a false pragmatic artifice. I say this because to change any artifice from an artifice to a pragmatic artifice, the guns of labor by sedition to such corruption are only found through the catapult of direct allegorical transformation! We can see this as preposterous nammylillicking. Should you also deny that the prosperous poisons are not bled of these fortunes; that cancer, delusion, sexual delusion, autism, obsession, etc. are not the direct results of allegorical tampering, you would do well to notice your bearings.
Robert Mayer
In our semblance of tuition towards transcendence we would register the Plainest Observation:
Our workload represents major galleries of expedition
1 Independent Instructional Decoy
2 Dependent Instructional Decoy that does not experience
3 Dependent Instructional Decoy that does experience
4 Information being Passed back Through our Immediate Pasts
[here our disquotias, not all of my origination
Artifices - any and all acting points fostered through our galleries of expedition
Monitions - competitive banks in the recesses of analytical propriety, those whose information traverse between artifices]
Dialectic and fetched observation can be found in the recesses of our most gracious impediment. Tries towards competitive dominance in the realms of satisfactory embellishments would grace us to revolve around the corruptive, not calculated precarious gambits of illusiory propulsion. However, standard predication emits compulsion of traced rhythmic effort, prefunction. We would call it quit if for not its becoming as the writ of poisons, complete in esoteric function. Here i claim the acknowledgment of worsened folks. The culprit and ultimate antagonist: Allegorical Performance. Pride in fortune here does not etch us well in its abodes. Here now our enemy.
When reactions compel the safekeeping of the solution towards learning without worshiping thought, the kind simplest doctrine would persevere as notable. When broad information is wrapped up in allegorical winter, the sufferer loses.
The operation given by the condemnation of prime concourse shows what becomes of those prone to allegorical computation. Those with memories wrapped in allegory would under-perform, those with memories not wrapped in allegories would perform exceptionally.
To speak of this allegorical performance one must become adamant, all is well, but the definition of ones commitment to the topic can be found in ordinary people. Readers in prophesy decide through mentions of a catapult in esoterics; fortunate peoples dwell in the ranks of herald opportunity to their midsts, mainly thus speaking: One successful hero would mock his preparation to use our not-so-heralded secret: A hero never uses original connection aspiration rumination as a false pragmatic artifice. I say this because to change any artifice from an artifice to a pragmatic artifice, the guns of labor by sedition to such corruption are only found through the catapult of direct allegorical transformation! We can see this as preposterous nammylillicking. Should you also deny that the prosperous poisons are not bled of these fortunes; that cancer, delusion, sexual delusion, autism, obsession, etc. are not the direct results of allegorical tampering, you would do well to notice your bearings.
Robert Mayer
Primciment Spackle, Drug Use
Primciment Spackle, Drug Use
Honorary computations would dwell on the design to lay profane wellings in the perverse system whose label shorts them insistence. The verse in pasting a virtuous naminal case to a custom so shunned from systematic welcome would quarter the favor to understand a belonging.
The presentation of hard relationship would propose the acclimated judgement from the normal response to the verdict of stewardship in the linens of declaratory providence. All assistance in topiary conduct is versatile and quarantines in the patronage of superstitious compelling fall on the innocent. Mandates are adjudicated amongst swell-pride and the provocatory shape of honesty does not prevent the possibility of foreign judgement in tapered conscience, when qualifying the summit of opinion. Change in the wits of commendation do prevent the compensation to align to the foreign resentment.. The rationale that systematic abuse of the reliant commitment to clean slate delta do not adhere to the convent that has established how we denote the fervent resolute guidance we sentence to tragedy.
Open variants in "primciment" (Ghost-Muscle, IFS) and microcosmic relationship to universal existence here on earth cannot begin to find a wary truth in open conduct relaying the reserve that would declare open categorical growth opinion in the passage of adherent primciment-rationale.
The solution in categorical opinion is the farthest cloaked extention of rationale-commitment in pre-reserved finite opportunity. An option in marked unity to compose the regulatory benign fascism in presidential reign over the copying of virtual image markers on the adherence to strict primciment-rationale use (currently forgiving the war on drugs) should be plainly a garb of the facets of personal freedom. Perhaps drug use would forgive temporary malignant detriment in heinous relegation. Temporary drug use would serve the clean-slate delta to not remain on rationale resign to create dictation-activated creative primciment focality. That focality remains to be found as a stage in proper sober growth in maturity. The use of standardization to participation in virtual environment that declares "Safety" in [mislocating] perpetration of extremely harmful creative primciment guardianship that may arrive with certain stages of maturity can be protected with reverent drug use. This means that drug use can be maintained as addictive without causing innocence from being harmful at all.
( I do not condone the use of illegal drugs)
Rob Mayer
Honorary computations would dwell on the design to lay profane wellings in the perverse system whose label shorts them insistence. The verse in pasting a virtuous naminal case to a custom so shunned from systematic welcome would quarter the favor to understand a belonging.
The presentation of hard relationship would propose the acclimated judgement from the normal response to the verdict of stewardship in the linens of declaratory providence. All assistance in topiary conduct is versatile and quarantines in the patronage of superstitious compelling fall on the innocent. Mandates are adjudicated amongst swell-pride and the provocatory shape of honesty does not prevent the possibility of foreign judgement in tapered conscience, when qualifying the summit of opinion. Change in the wits of commendation do prevent the compensation to align to the foreign resentment.. The rationale that systematic abuse of the reliant commitment to clean slate delta do not adhere to the convent that has established how we denote the fervent resolute guidance we sentence to tragedy.
Open variants in "primciment" (Ghost-Muscle, IFS) and microcosmic relationship to universal existence here on earth cannot begin to find a wary truth in open conduct relaying the reserve that would declare open categorical growth opinion in the passage of adherent primciment-rationale.
The solution in categorical opinion is the farthest cloaked extention of rationale-commitment in pre-reserved finite opportunity. An option in marked unity to compose the regulatory benign fascism in presidential reign over the copying of virtual image markers on the adherence to strict primciment-rationale use (currently forgiving the war on drugs) should be plainly a garb of the facets of personal freedom. Perhaps drug use would forgive temporary malignant detriment in heinous relegation. Temporary drug use would serve the clean-slate delta to not remain on rationale resign to create dictation-activated creative primciment focality. That focality remains to be found as a stage in proper sober growth in maturity. The use of standardization to participation in virtual environment that declares "Safety" in [mislocating] perpetration of extremely harmful creative primciment guardianship that may arrive with certain stages of maturity can be protected with reverent drug use. This means that drug use can be maintained as addictive without causing innocence from being harmful at all.
( I do not condone the use of illegal drugs)
Rob Mayer
Virtual Environments, Habitat "Cures?"
Virtual Environment Jumpers, "Cures"? to Infinity
Working upon the assumption that action potential can be consumed by request, the finite effort of tribute rests in line with cooperation of readiness-es. I have credited examinations into three vital modes of virtual environment jumping, competing arrogances, if you will. Under the assumption that readers are subjectively performing them I here propose them in careful manner.
___ _ _ _ _ _ _
1- Jumping through lists of activities involving qualities to be admired. About the tendency for information to be stalled out of "edit-mode tyranny" with examination, important realizers would have to cycle through this information extremely quickly, not staying on any information particular to a map of any ex-vocation's practical habitat.
2- Jumping through lists of virtual environments that a realizer would like to turn off publicly through the wearing of information related to these virtual environments and the jumping thereof
3 - Jumping through virtual environments that a realizer would like to turn off/not exhibit, later readying them for deletion of neglectable sophistry (which happens when a realizer compares that information to that realizer).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The performance of (Jump Type 2) would create the complicated world-must! that a cooperation in rendition of its performance would break information apart, down and out of a wholesome musical cooperation. This conversation brings us to the function of communication of use of the golden ratio, common splendids in use of Jump Type 2, and our ultimate gratification of non-practical music as successful honesty.
In the eternal registration of platonic ideal, the use of virtual environment jumpers has been to perform action that would register gratification in immediate use, and to provoke the contentious to never applicate the use of prediction of practical gratification. Jump Type 2 and mediary use of all jump types would serve a normal social function, creating the "black-space" for 'remedial dishonesty'.. or the use of comprehension of the golden ratio and its involvement being split up, cultured, wound, spectated against, and pronounced in order to cause level comprehensive human action.. This experience of Jump Type use would be called fun to many; in fun there is always another way to resume exhibition and another way for the golden ratio to be complied with. This "behavior"(economics) could change drastically with the amount of people who operate about it.
An acknowledgement of my term "remedial dishonesty" does in fact call on our proper solution to such dishonesty, that being good music (music with no pentatonic scale) non practical behavior ( and absence of pragmatics) or cautious examination of the cosmos. These behaviors can all be found in wild, non-retarded nature. These are the forces of the constant reparation that allows humans to experience all of our Jump Types.
Sadness
Sadness here i object, is a moral presolution, potentially necessary function in maturity. Use of the virtual environment jumping in human capacity would create memories of conduct, social commencements, ability to preserve and privatize reactions, derilect motion, what to ignore, etc. I hereby propose the intelligent propagation of release towards instillment or offering of instillment of agents which are supposed to "cure" sadness to be against the consummation of the bounties of free speech, which in legal mandate hereafter can only have been resumed by the retarded. Sadness cures destroy intelligence and with common retarded instillment cause mass horror in magic. All provocation hereafter must have its resources re-commited to the keeping funny all angles of mass proportion, that everyone must be not hindered to retardation equally.
Rob Mayer
Working upon the assumption that action potential can be consumed by request, the finite effort of tribute rests in line with cooperation of readiness-es. I have credited examinations into three vital modes of virtual environment jumping, competing arrogances, if you will. Under the assumption that readers are subjectively performing them I here propose them in careful manner.
___ _ _ _ _ _ _
1- Jumping through lists of activities involving qualities to be admired. About the tendency for information to be stalled out of "edit-mode tyranny" with examination, important realizers would have to cycle through this information extremely quickly, not staying on any information particular to a map of any ex-vocation's practical habitat.
2- Jumping through lists of virtual environments that a realizer would like to turn off publicly through the wearing of information related to these virtual environments and the jumping thereof
3 - Jumping through virtual environments that a realizer would like to turn off/not exhibit, later readying them for deletion of neglectable sophistry (which happens when a realizer compares that information to that realizer).
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
The performance of (Jump Type 2) would create the complicated world-must! that a cooperation in rendition of its performance would break information apart, down and out of a wholesome musical cooperation. This conversation brings us to the function of communication of use of the golden ratio, common splendids in use of Jump Type 2, and our ultimate gratification of non-practical music as successful honesty.
In the eternal registration of platonic ideal, the use of virtual environment jumpers has been to perform action that would register gratification in immediate use, and to provoke the contentious to never applicate the use of prediction of practical gratification. Jump Type 2 and mediary use of all jump types would serve a normal social function, creating the "black-space" for 'remedial dishonesty'.. or the use of comprehension of the golden ratio and its involvement being split up, cultured, wound, spectated against, and pronounced in order to cause level comprehensive human action.. This experience of Jump Type use would be called fun to many; in fun there is always another way to resume exhibition and another way for the golden ratio to be complied with. This "behavior"(economics) could change drastically with the amount of people who operate about it.
An acknowledgement of my term "remedial dishonesty" does in fact call on our proper solution to such dishonesty, that being good music (music with no pentatonic scale) non practical behavior ( and absence of pragmatics) or cautious examination of the cosmos. These behaviors can all be found in wild, non-retarded nature. These are the forces of the constant reparation that allows humans to experience all of our Jump Types.
Sadness
Sadness here i object, is a moral presolution, potentially necessary function in maturity. Use of the virtual environment jumping in human capacity would create memories of conduct, social commencements, ability to preserve and privatize reactions, derilect motion, what to ignore, etc. I hereby propose the intelligent propagation of release towards instillment or offering of instillment of agents which are supposed to "cure" sadness to be against the consummation of the bounties of free speech, which in legal mandate hereafter can only have been resumed by the retarded. Sadness cures destroy intelligence and with common retarded instillment cause mass horror in magic. All provocation hereafter must have its resources re-commited to the keeping funny all angles of mass proportion, that everyone must be not hindered to retardation equally.
Rob Mayer
Virtual Environment Jump Types, Persistence of Discussing (3), in 1 and 2
Virtual Environment Jump Types, Persistence of Discussing (3), in 1 and 2
Jump Types 1 2 3
Owing odds to the ingenious mindful that the same behavior registry becomes of a human no matter how it is using virtual environment elements to jump to other virtual environments, people have made it manageable to discuss the objectivity that such behavior registry is the iconic representation of internal coalition, although the menace owing the suitor its prevalence can be disavowed its conclusion.
We have seen the jump types as follows (IFS), 1 Traveling lists of admirable conditions, 2 traveling lists of conditions to be used to be turned off, 3 travelling lists of conditions remarkably understood to be hidden and unexamined.
Conditions in permanent expression such as photography have created a near unprecedented challenge to the modern e-culture. The recommendation to express the prediction of jump type 3 have allowed the planning of special wounds inflict-able upon assumption of the specialty that would allow the rendering of periodic expression of the 3rd jump type. This expression can only be retained amongst the voluntary action involving jump types 1 and 2. Sincerely, the provisions allowed us as people would provoke the popular revision of this anal of (government) the peoples exclusive third channel! Revisions in prophetic guilt themselves have not conditioned popular edifice to control the staples of culture that would prepare the mind for the influx of data proportioned to express chosen panel idiosyncrasy built for nothing but the complacent resolution of this direct agenda.
Prophetic revision could ensue..
Robert Mayer
Jump Types 1 2 3
Owing odds to the ingenious mindful that the same behavior registry becomes of a human no matter how it is using virtual environment elements to jump to other virtual environments, people have made it manageable to discuss the objectivity that such behavior registry is the iconic representation of internal coalition, although the menace owing the suitor its prevalence can be disavowed its conclusion.
We have seen the jump types as follows (IFS), 1 Traveling lists of admirable conditions, 2 traveling lists of conditions to be used to be turned off, 3 travelling lists of conditions remarkably understood to be hidden and unexamined.
Conditions in permanent expression such as photography have created a near unprecedented challenge to the modern e-culture. The recommendation to express the prediction of jump type 3 have allowed the planning of special wounds inflict-able upon assumption of the specialty that would allow the rendering of periodic expression of the 3rd jump type. This expression can only be retained amongst the voluntary action involving jump types 1 and 2. Sincerely, the provisions allowed us as people would provoke the popular revision of this anal of (government) the peoples exclusive third channel! Revisions in prophetic guilt themselves have not conditioned popular edifice to control the staples of culture that would prepare the mind for the influx of data proportioned to express chosen panel idiosyncrasy built for nothing but the complacent resolution of this direct agenda.
Prophetic revision could ensue..
Robert Mayer
Ixkloo
I propose there is one Highest number name namable in sophistry and nomenclature by the human mind. And it shall be called:
" Ixkloo. "
Robert Mayer
" Ixkloo. "
Robert Mayer